An ability of isolated strains to efficiently cooperate in ethanolic fermentation of agricultural plant refuse under initially aerobic thermophilic conditions: Oxygen deletion process appended to consolidated bioprocessing (CBP)

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1768-1775

  Miyazaki, Kohji ^a   Irbis, Chagan ^a   Takada, Junya ^a   Matsuura, Aya ^a  

^a KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bean curd refuse; CH3SH production; Ethanol; Oxygen deletion process; Thermophile

Indexed keywords

BEAN CURD REFUSE; OXYGEN DELETION PROCESS; THERMOPHILES;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; OXYGEN; STRAIN;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ALCOHOL; BIOETHANOL; BIOFUEL; CELLULOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; METHANETHIOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; OXYGEN; PLANTS (BOTANY); STRAIN;

BACTERIUM; CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; NATURAL GAS; OXIC CONDITIONS; PHYLOGENETICS; PLANT RESIDUE; THERMOPHILY; THIOL;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; BEAN CURD REFUSE; BIOPROCESS; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CLOSTRIDIUM; COCULTURE; FERMENTATION; FOOD PROCESSING; GEOBACILLUS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMOANAEROBACTER; THERMOPHILIC BACTERIUM;

AGRICULTURE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ETHANOL; FABACEAE; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; OXYGEN; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SULFHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; THERMOANAEROBACTER;

CLOSTRIDIUM; GEOBACILLUS; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM;

EID: 37549024940     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.045     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Banat I.M., and Marchant R. Characterization and potential industrial applications of five novel, thermotolerant, fermentative, yeast strains. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11 (1995) 304-306
2. Banat I.M., Nigam P., Singh D., Marchant R., and McHale A.P. Ethanol production at elevated temperatures and alcohol concentrations. Part I - Yeasts in general. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14 (1998) 809-821
3. Banat I.M., Marchant R., and Rahman T.J. Geobacillus debilis sp. nov., a novel obligately thermophilic bacterium isolated from a cool soil environment, and reassignment of Bacillus pallidus to Geobacillus pallidus comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54 (2004) 2197-2201
4. Booth I.R. Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 49 (1985) 359-378
5. Cook J., and Beyea J. Bioenergy in the United States: progress and possibilities. Biomass Bioenergy 18 (2000) 441-455
6. Dien B.S., Cott M.A., and Jeffries T.W. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63 (2003) 258-266
7. Doi R.H. Microbial conversion of corn stalks to riches. J. Bacteriol. 185 (2003) 701-702
8. Edwards C. Thermophiles. In: Edwrds C. (Ed). Microbiology of Extreme Environments (1990), McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York 1-32
9. Fardeau M.L., Ollivier B., Garcia J.L., and Patel B.K. Transfer of Thermobacteroides leptospartum and Clostridium thermolacticum as Clostridium stercorarium subsp. leptospartum subsp. thermolacticum subsp. nov., comb. nov. and C. stercorarium subsp. thermolacticum subsp. nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51 (2001) 1127-1131
10. Focher B.A., Marzetti M., Cattaneo P.L., Beltrame, and Carniti P. Effects of structural features of cotton cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 26 (1981) 1989-1999
11. Fondevila M., and Dehority B.A. Degradation and utilization of forage hemicellulose by rumen bacteria, singly and in coculture or added sequentially. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 77 (1994) 541-548
12. Fong J.C.N., Svenson C.J., Nakasugi K., Leong C.T.C., Bowman J.P., Chen B., Glenn D.R., Neilan B.A., and Rogers P.L. Isolation and characterization of two novel ethanol-tolerant facultive-anaerobic thermophilic bacteria strains from waste compost. Extremophiles 10 (2006) 363-372
13. Galbe M., and Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 59 (2002) 618-658
14. Hartley B.S., and Payton M.A. Industrial prospects for thermophiles and thermophilic enzymes. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 48 (1983) 133-146
15. Huang L., Gibbins L., and Forsberg C.W. Transmembrane pH gradient and membrane potential in Clostridium acetobutylicum during growth under acetogenic and solventogenic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50 (1985) 1043-1047
16. Irbis C., and Ushida K. Detection of methanogens and proteobacteria from a single cell of rumen ciliate protozoa. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 50 (2004) 203-212
17. Klapatch T.R., Hogsett D.A.L., Baskaran S., Pl S., and Lynd L.R. Organism development and characterization for ethanol production using thermophilic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45-46 (1994) 209-223
18. Kumar S., Tamura K., and Nei M. MEGA3: Integrated Software for Molecular Evolutionary Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 5 (2004) 150-163
19. LaPara T.M., Nakatsu C.H., Pantea L., and Alleman J.E. Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial communities in mesophilic and thermophilic bioreactors treating pharmaceutical wastewater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 (2000) 3951-3959
20. Lynd L.R., Weimer P.J., van Zyl W.H., and Pretorius I.S. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66 (2002) 506-577
21. Lynd L.R., van Zyl W.H., McBride J.E., and Laser M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16 (2005) 577-583
22. Miron J., and Ben-Ghedalia D. The degradation and utilization of wheat-straw cell-wall monosaccharide components by defined ruminal cellulolytic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38 (1992) 432-437
23. Miron J., and Ben-Ghedalia D. Digestion of structural polysaccharides from Panicum and vetch hays by the rumen bacterial strains Fibrobacter succinogenes BL2 and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens D1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39 (1993) 756-759
24. Miyazaki K., Hino T., and Itabashi H. Effects of extracellular pH on the intracellular pH, membrane potential of cellulolytic ruminal bacteria, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Fibrobacter succinogenes. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 38 (1992) 567-573
25. Olsson L., and Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 18 (1996) 312-331
26. Palmarrola-Adrados B., Chotêborská P., Galbe M., and Zacchi G. Ethanol production from non-starch carbohydrates of wheat bran. Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005) 843-850
27. Rainey F.A., Ward N.L., Morgan H.W., Toalster R., and Stackebrandt E. Phylogenetic analysis of anaerobic thermophilic bacteria: aid for their reclassification. J. Bacteriol. 175 (1993) 4772-4779
28. Riley M.A., and Wertz J.E. Bacteriocin diversity: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Biochimie 84 (2002) 357-364
29. Sommer P., Georgieva T., and Ahring B.K. Potential for using thermophilic anaerobic bacteria for bioethanol production from hemicellulose. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 32 (2004) 283-289
30. Ushida K., Fukusada S., and Kojima Y. Effect of pH on dissimilatory sulfate reduction by porcine cecal microflora. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Jpn.) 69 (1998) 571-575
31. Wang D.I.C., Avgerinos G.C., Biocic I., Wang S.D., and Fang H.Y. Ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 300 (1983) 323-333
32. Wheals A.E., Bassao L.C., Alves D.M.G., and Amorim H.V. Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biotechnol. 17 (1999) 482-487
33. Wyman C.E. Biomass ethanol: technical progress, opportunities, and commercial challenges. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 24 (1999) 189-226
34. Zaldivar J., Nielsen J., and Olsson L. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56 (2001) 17-34
35. Zhang T., Liu H., and Fang H.H. Biohydrogen production from starch in wastewater under thermophilic condition. J. Environ. Manage. 69 (2003) 149-156