The structural and functional development of skin during the first year of life: Investigations using non-invasive methods

Textbook of Aging Skin

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 715-724

  Stamatas, Georgios ^a  

^a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052833187     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89656-2_69     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Whiteman DC, Whiteman CA, Green AC. Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: A systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:69-82.
2. Holbrook K. Embryogenesis of the Skin. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2000.
3. Hoath SB, Maibach H (eds). Neonatal Skin-Structure and Function. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003.
4. Nikolovski J, Stamatas GN, Kollias N, Wiegand BC. Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:1728-1736.
5. Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Ebel JP, et al. Biomedical assessment and instrumental evaluation of healthy infant skin. Pediatr Dermatol. 2002;19:473-481.
6. Kalia YN, Nonato LB, Lund CH, Guy RH. Development of skin barrier function in premature infants. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111: 320-326.
7. Rutter N, Hull D. Water loss from the skin of term and preterm babies. Arch Dis Child. 1979;54:858-868.
8. Visscher MO, Narendran V, Pickens WL, et al. Vernix caseosa in neonatal adaptation. J Perinatol. 2005;25:440-446.
9. Evans NJ, Rutter N. Development of the epidermis in the newborn. Biol Neonate. 1986;49:74-80.
10. Harpin VA, Rutter N. Barrier properties of the newborn infant's skin. J Pediatr. 1983;102:419-425.
11. Hoath SB. The stickiness of newborn skin: Bioadhesion and the epidermal barrier [comment]. J Pediatr. 1997;131:338-340.
12. Yosipovitch G, Maayan-Metzger A, Merlob P, Sirota L. Skin barrier properties in different body areas in neonates. Pediatrics. 2000;106:105-108.
13. Anderson RR. Polarized light examination and photography of the skin. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:1000-1005.
14. Muccini JA, Kollias N, Phillips SB, et al. Polarized light photography in the evaluation of photoaging. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33: 765-769.
15. Corcuff P, Bertrand C, Leveque JL. Morphometry of human epidermis in vivo by real-time confocal microscopy. Arch Dermatol Res. 1993;285:475-481.
16. Fink-Puches R, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Smolle J, Kerl H. Confocal laser scanning microscopy: A new optical microscopic technique for applications in pathology and dermatology. J Cutan Pathol. 1995;22:252-259.
17. Rajadhyaksha M, Gonzalez S, Zavislan JM, et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: Advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;113: 293-303.
18. Egawa M, Hirao T, Takahashi M. In vivo estimation of stratum corneum thickness from water concentration profiles obtained with Raman spectroscopy. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007;87:4-8.
19. Nemes Z, Steinert PM. Bricks and mortar of the epidermal barrier. Exp Mol Med. 1999;31:5-19.
20. Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Luedtke MA, et al. Infant skin microstructure assessed in vivo differs from adult skin in organization and at the cellular level. Ped Dermatol. 2009;26: In press.
21. Neerken S, Lucassen GW, Bisschop MA, et al. Characterization of age-related effects in human skin: A comparative study that applies confocal laser scanning microscopy and optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:274-281.
22. Holbrook KA. A Histological Comparison of Infant and Adult Skin. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982.
23. Tobin DJ. Biochemistry of human skin-our brain on the outside. Chem Soc Rev. 2006;35:52-67.
24. Field TM, Schanberg SM, Scafidi F, et al. Tactile/kinesthetic stimulation effects on preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 1986;77:654-658.
25. Field TM, Grizzle N, Scafidi F, Abrams S.Massage therapy for infants of depressed mothers. Infant Behav Dev. 1996;19:107-112.
26. Gray L, Watt L, Blass EM. Skin-to-skin contact is analgesic in healthy newborns. Pediatrics. 2000;105:e14.
27. Tagami H, Kikuchi K, O'goshi K. Electrical properties of newborn skin. In: Hoath SB, Maibach HI (eds) Neonatal Skin Structure and Function. New York: Mercel Dekker, 2003.
28. Caspers PJ, Lucassen GW, Carter EA, et al. In vivo confocal Raman microspectroscopy of the skin: Noninvasive determination of molecular concentration profiles. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116:434-442.
29. Caspers PJ, Lucassen GW, Bruining HA, Puppels GJ. Automated depth-scanning confocal Raman microspectrometer for rapid in vivo determination of water concentration profiles in human skin. J Raman Spectrosc. 2000;31:813-818.
30. Tupker RA. Prediction of irritancy in the human skin irritancy model and occupational setting. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49:61-69.
31. Imhof R. TEWL and the Skin Barrier (invited lecture). Sixth Annual Meeting of the Skin Forum, Winchester, 2005.
32. Chamlin SL, Kao J, Frieden IJ, et al. Ceramide-dominant barrier repair lipids alleviate childhood atopic dermatitis: Changes in barrier function provide a sensitive indicator of disease activity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:198-208.
33. Rim JH, Jo SJ, Park JY, et al. Electrical measurement of moisturizing effect on skin hydration and barrier function in psoriasis patients. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30:409-413.
34. Atrux-Tallau N, Huynh NT, Gardette L, et al. Effects of physical and chemical treatments upon biophysical properties and micro-relief of human skin. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008;300:243-251.
35. Chilcott RP, Dalton CH, Emmanuel AJ, et al. Transepidermal water loss does not correlate with skin barrier function in vitro. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:871-875.
36. Wilson DR, Maibach H. Transepidermal Water Loss. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982.
37. Tagami H, Kanamaru Y, Inoue K, et al. Water sorption-desorption test of the skin in vivo for functional assessment of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol. 1982;78:425-428.
38. Gillies R, Zonios G, Anderson RR, Kollias N. Fluorescence excitation spectroscopy provides information about human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115:704-707.
39. Brancaleon L, Lin G, Kollias N. The in vivo fluorescence of tryptophan moieties in human skin increases with UV exposure and is a marker for epidermal proliferation. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;113: 977-982.
40. Doukas AG, Soukos NS, Babusis S, et al. Fluorescence excitation spectroscopy for the measurement of epidermal proliferation. Photochem Photobiol. 2001;74:96-102.
41. Stamatas GN, Estanislao RB, Suero M, et al. Facial skin fluorescence as a marker of the skin's response to chronic environmental insults and its dependence on age. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:125-132.
42. Fenske NA, Lober CW. Structural and functional changes of normal aging skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;15:571-585.
43. Henderson CA, Taylor J, Cunliffe WJ. Sebum excretion rates in mothers and neonates. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:110-111.
44. Agache P, Blanc D, Barrand C, Laurent R. Sebum levels during the first year of life. Br J Dermatol. 1980;103:643-649.
45. Rutter N. Eccrine sweating in the newborn. In: Hoath SB, Maibach HI (eds) Neonatal Skin Structure and Function. New York: Mercel Dekker, 2003.
46. Hoath SB, Maibach HI (eds). Neonatal Skin Structure and Function. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003.