Prediction of irritancy in the human skin irritancy model and occupational setting

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 61-69

  Tupker, R A ^a  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis; Extrinsic factors; Intrinsic factors; Irritancy testing; Occupational dermatitis; Prediction; Prospective cohort studies

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; IRRITANT DERMATITIS; OCCUPATIONAL ECZEMA; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN TEST; TOXICITY TESTING;

DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; DERMATITIS, OCCUPATIONAL; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK FACTORS; SKIN TESTS;

EID: 0348134680     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00171.x     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Hagerman G. Ueber das 'traumiterative' (toxische) Ekzem. Dermatologica 1957: 115: 525-529.
2. Phillips L, Steinberg M, Maibach H I, Akers W A. A comparison of rabbit and human skin responses to certain irritants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1972: 21: 369-382.
3. Wilhelm K -P, Böttjer B, Sigers C -P. Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 709-715.
4. Boxman I L, Hensbergen P J, Van der Schors R C, Bruynzeel D P, Tensen C P, Ponec M. Proteomic analysis of skin irritation reveals the induction of HSP27 by sodium lauryl sulfate in human skin. Br J Dermatol 2002: 146: 777-785.
5. Tupker R A, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee C H, Fartasch M, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the standardization group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 53-69.
6. Björnberg A. Skin reactions to primary irritants in patients with hand eczema. An investigation with matched controls. Thesis. University of Gotenburg, 1968.
7. Agner T, Serup J. Sodium lauryl sulfate for irritant patch testing - A dose-response study using bioengineering methods for determination of skin irritation. J Invest Dermatol 1990: 95: 543-547.
8. Aramaki J, Loffler C, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Loffler H. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 704-708.
9. Loffler H, Pirker C, Aramaki J, Frosch P J, Happle R, Effendy I. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate. Eur J Dermatol 2001: 11: 416-419.
10. Mathias C G T. Clinical and experimental aspects of cutaneous irritation. In: Dermatotoxicology, Marzulli F N, Maibach H I (eds): Washington, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1983, 167-183.
11. Basketter D A, Griffiths H A, Wang X M, Wilhelm K P, McFadden J. Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 35: 208-213.
12. Kligman A M, Wooding W M. A method for the measurement and evaluation of irritants on human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1967: 49: 78-94.
13. Frosch P J, Kligman A M. The chamber-scarification test for irritancy. Contact Dermatitis 1976: 2: 314-324.
14. Andersen K E. Reproducibility of the chamber scarification test. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 181-184.
15. Frosch P J, Kligman A M. The soap chamber test. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979: 1: 35-41.
16. Tupker R A, Coenraads P J, Pinnagoda J, Nater J P. Baseline transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as a prediction of susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 265-269.
17. Tupker R A, Coenraads P J, Fidler V, de Jong M C J M, van der Meer J B, De Monchy J G R. Irritant susceptibility and wheal and flare reactions to bio-active agents in atopic dermatitis: I. Influence of disease severity. Br J Dermatol 1995: 133: 358-364.
18. Tupker R A, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads P J, Nater J P. The influence of repeated exposure to surfactants on the human skin as determined by transepidermal water loss and visual scoring. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 108-114.
19. Tupker R A, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads P J, Nater P J. Susceptibility to irritants: role of barrier function, skin dryness and history of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1990: 123: 199-205.
20. Tupker R A, Bunte E E, Fidler V, Wiechers J W, Coenraads P J. Irritancy ranking of anionic detergents using one-time occlusive, repeated occlusive and repeated open tests. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 316-322.
21. Van der Valk P G M, Maibach H I. Post-application occlusion substantially increases the irritant response to the skin to repeated short-term sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 21: 335-338.
22. Tupker R A, Vermeulen K, Fidler V, Coenraads P J. Irritancy of sodium laurate and other anionic detergents using an open exposure model. Skin Res Technol 1997: 3: 133-136.
23. Frosch P J, Kurte A, Pilz B. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. III. The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in humans. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 113-118.
24. English J S, Ratcliffe J, Williams H C. Irritancy of industrial hand cleansers tested by repeated open application on human skin. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 84-88.
25. Smeenk G. The influence of detergents on the skin (a clinical and biochemical study). Arch Klin Exp Dermatol 1969: 235: 180-191.
26. Imokawa G, Mishima Y. Cumulative effect of surfactants on cutaneous horny layers: adsorption onto human keratin layers in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 1979: 5: 357-366.
27. Frosch P J. Irritancy of soaps and detergent bars. In: Principles of Cosmetics for the Dermatologist, Frost P, Horwitz S N (eds): St. Louis, CV Mosby Company, 1982, 5-12.
28. Wigger-Alberti W, Fischer T, Greif C, Maddern P, Eisner P. Effects of various grit-containing cleansers on skin barrier function. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 136-140.
29. Blank J H, Gould J. Penetration of anionic surfactants into skin. III. Penetration from buffered sodium laurate solutions. J Invest Dermatol 1961: 37: 485-488.
30. Treffel P, Muret P, Muret-D'Aniello P, Coumes-Marquet S, Agache P. Effect of occlusion on in vitro percutaneous absorption of two compounds with different physicochemical properties. Skin Pharmacol 1992: 5: 108-113.
31. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Coenraads P J, Nater J P. Prediction of susceptibility to an irritant response by trans-epidermal water loss. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 341-346.
32. Agner T. Skin susceptibility in uninvolved skin of hand eczema patients and healthy controls. Br J Dermatol 1991: 125: 140-146.
33. Agner T. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation in normal skin. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 108-114.
34. Freeman S, Maibach H I. Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988: 19: 496-502.
35. Berardesca E, Maibach H I. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulfate induced skin irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 65-70.
36. Fluhr J W, Kuss O, Diepgen T, Lazzerini S, Pelosi A, Gloor M, Berardesca E. Testing for irritation with a multi-factorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 696-703.
37. Shahidullah M, Raffle E J, Rimmer A R, Frain-Bell W. Transepidermal water loss in patients with dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1969: 81: 722-730.
38. Effendy I, Loeffler H, Maibach H I. Baseline transepidermal water loss in patients with acute and healed irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 371-374.
39. Gloor M, Völlm P, Gehse M, Ringelmann R. Irritationseffekt von Tensiden bei Patienten mit Gewerbeekzemen im Friseur-und Krankenpflegeberuf. Dermatosen 1985: 33: 86-89.
40. Van der Valk P G M, Nater J P, Bleumink E. Vulnerability of the skin to surfactants in different groups of eczema patients and controls as measured by water vapour loss. Clin Exp Dermatol 1985: 10: 98-103.
41. Nassif A, Chan S C, Storrs F J, Hanifin J M. Abnormal skin irritancy in atopic dermatitis and in atopy without dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1994: 130: 1402-1407.
42. Elias P M, Wood L C, Feingold K R. Epidermal pathogenesis of inflammatory dermatoses. Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 119-126.
43. Willis C M. Variability in responsiveness to irritants: thought on possible underlying mechanisms. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 47: 267-271.
44. Tupker R A, Pinnagoda J, Nater J P. The transient and cumulative effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on the epidermal barrier assessed by transepidermal water loss: inter-individual variation. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1990: 70: 1-5.
45. Klein G, Grubauer G, Fritsch P. The influence of daily dish-washing with synthetic detergent on human skin. Br J Dermatol 1992: 127: 131-137.
46. Conti A, Di Nardo A, Seidenari S. No alteration of biophysical parameters in the skin of subjects with respiratory atopy. Dermatology 1996: 192: 317-320.
47. Allen M H, Wakelin S H, Holloway D, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Barker J N, Mcfadden J P. Association of TNFA gene polymorphism at position-308 with susceptibility to irritant contact dermatitis. Immunogenetics 2000: 51: 201-205.
48. Pastore S, Corinti S, La Placa M, Didona B, Girolomoni G. Interferon-gamma promotes exaggerated cytokine production in keratinocytes cultured from patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998: 101: 538-544.
49. McOsker D E, Beck L W. Characteristics of accommodated (hardened) skin. J Invest Dermatol 1967: 48: 372-383.
50. Widmer J, Elsner P, Burg G. Skin irritant reactivity following experimental cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 30: 35-39.
51. Nilsson E, Bäck O. The importance of anamnestic information of atopy, metal dermatitis and earlier hand eczema for the development of hand dermatitis in women in wet hospital work. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1986: 66: 45-50.
52. Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Eisner P. Hand eczema in metalworker trainees - an analysis of risk factors. Contat Dermatitis 2000: 43: 327-332.
53. John S M, Uter W, Schwanitz H J. Relevance of multi-parametric skin bioengineering in a prospectively-followed cohort of junior hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 161-168.
54. Smit H A, van Rijssen A, Vandenbroucke J P, Coenraads P J. Individual susceptibility and the incidence of hand dermatitis in a cohort of hairdressers and nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994: 20: 113-121.
55. Coenraads P J, Pinnagoda J. Dermatitis and water vapour loss in metal workers. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 13: 347-348.
56. Goh C L, Gan S L. Efficacies of barrier creams and after-work emollient cream against cutting fluid dermatitis in metal workers: a prospective study. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 176-181.
57. Smith H R, Armstrong D K, Holloway D, Whittam L, Basketter D A, McFadden J P. Skin irritation thresholds in hairdressers: implications for the development of hand dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2002: 146: 849-852.
58. Lammintausta K, Kalimo K. Atopy and hand dermatitis in hospital work. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 301-308.
59. Diepgen T L. Die atopische Hautdiathese. Epidemiologie, Klinik und berufsdermatologische Bedeutung, Gentner Verlag Stuttgart, Germany 1991.
60. Hanifin J M, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980: 92: 44-47.
61. Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Elsner P. Role of the atopy score and of single atopic features as risk factors for the development of hand eczema in trainee metal workers. Br J Dermatol 1999: 140: 922-924.
62. Diepgen T L. Personal communication.
63. Berndt U, Hinnen U, Iliev D, Elsner P. Is occupational irritant contact dermatitis predictable by cutaneous bioengineering methods? Results Swiss Metalworkers' Eczema Study (PROMETES). Dermatology 1999: 198: 351-354.
64. Funke U, Fartasch M, Diepgen T L. Incidence of work-related hand eczema during apprenticeship: first results of a prospective cohort study in the car industry. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 166-172.