Nutriproteomics and proteogenomics: Cultivating two novel hybrid fields of personalized medicine with added societal value

Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 240-244

  Ozdemir, Vural ^a   Armengaud, Jean ^b   Dubé, Laurette ^c   Aziz, Ramy Karam ^d   Knoppers, Bartha M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b DIF   (France)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Biomarkers; Biotechnology foresight; Gene centric human proteome project; Nutriproteomics; Personalized nutrition; Population biobanks; Prospective policy; Proteogenomics

Indexed keywords

DEINOCOCCUS; EATING; EDITORIAL; GENOMICS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME PROJECT; NONHUMAN; NUTRIGENOMICS; NUTRITION; OBESITY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 79952518808     PISSN: 18756921     EISSN: 18756913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/187569210793368230     Document Type: Editorial

References (35)

1. Patel SA, King CC, Lim PK, et al. Personalizing stem cell research and therapy: the arduous road ahead or missed opportunity? Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2010; 8(1): 25-36.
2. Kaput J, Astley S, Renkema M, et al. Harnessing nutrigenomics: development of web-based communication, databases, resources, and tools. Genes Nutr 2006; 1(1): 5-11.
3. Castle D, Cline C, Daar AS, et al. Science, society and the super-market: the opportunities and challenges for nutrigenomics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience 2006.
4. Garcia-Bailo B, Toguri C, Eny KM, et al. Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection. OMICS 2009; 13(1): 69-80.
5. Poland GA, Ovsyannikova IG, Jacobson RM. Application of pharmacogenomics to vaccines. Pharmacogenomics 2009; 10(5): 837-52.
6. Joly Y, McClellan KA, Knoppers BM. Personalized vaccines and public health genomics: anticipating and monitoring the ELSIs. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2010; 8(1): 4-6.
7. Ozdemir V, Husereau D, Hyland S, et al. Personalized medicine beyond genomics: New technologies, global health diplomacy and anticipatory governance. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2009; 7(4): 225-30.
8. Ozdemir V, Suarez-Kurtz G, Stenne R, et al. Risk assessment and communication tools for genotype associations with multifactorial phenotypes: the concept of edge effect and cultivating an ethical bridge between omics innovations and society. OMICS 2009; 13(1): 43-61.
9. Kussmann M. Nutriproteomics-Linking proteomics variation with personalized nutrition. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2010; 8(4): 245-56.
10. Rizkallah MR, Saad R, Aziz RK. The human microbiome project, personalized medicine and the birth of pharmacomicrobiomics. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2010; 8(3): 182-93.
11. Douma KF, Karsenberg K, Hummel MJ, et al. Methodology of constructive technology assessment in health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23(2): 162-8.
12. Guston DH, Sarewitz D. Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 2002; 24(1-2): 93-109.
13. [No authors listed] A gene-centric human proteome project: HUPO--the Human Proteome Organization. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9(2): 427-9.
14. [No authors listed] The call of the human proteome. Nat Methods 2010; 7(9): 661.
15. Armengaud J. Proteogenomics and systems biology: quest for the ultimate missing parts. Expert Rev Proteomics 2010; 7(1): 65-77.
16. Armengaud J. A perfect genome annotation is within reach with the proteomics and genomics alliance. Curr Opin Microbiol 2009; 12(3): 292-300.
17. Blouin C, Dubé L. Global health diplomacy for obesity prevention: lessons from tobacco control. J Public Health Policy 2010; 31(2): 244-55.
18. Nilsson T, Mann M, Aebersold R, et al. Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nat Methods 2010; 7(9): 681-5.
19. Armengaud J. Systems biology and synthetic biology: Understanding biological complexity on the critical path to personalized medicine. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 2010; 8(4): 257-67.
20. Rabilloud T, Hochstrasser D, Simpson RJ. Is a gene-centric human proteome project the best way for proteomics to serve biology? Proteomics 2010; 10(17): 3067-72.
21. Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research: Redmond, Washington 2009.
22. Kolker E. A vision for 21st century US Policy to support sustainable advancement of scientific discovery and technological innovation. OMICS 2010; 14(4): 333-5.
23. de Groot A, Dulermo R, Ortet P, et al. Alliance of proteomics and genomics to unravel the specificities of Sahara bacterium Deinococcus deserti. PLoS Genet 2009; 5(3): e1000434.
24. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9: 75.
25. Baudet M, Ortet P, Gaillard JC, et al. Proteomics-based refinement of Deinococcus deserti genome annotation reveals an unwonted use of non-canonical translation initiation codons. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9(2): 415-26.
26. Dubé L, Bechara A, Dagher A, et al. Obesity Prevention: The Role of Brain and Society on Individual Behavior. Elsevier: New York 2010.
27. Rezzi S, Ramadan Z, Martin FP, et al. Human metabolic phenotypes link directly to specific dietary preferences in healthy individuals. J Proteome Res 2007; 6(11): 4469-77.
28. Aziz RK. A hundred-year-old insight into the gut microbiome! Gut Pathog 2009; 1(1): 21.
29. Ostrom E, Janssen MA, Anderies JM. Going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104(39): 15176-8.
30. Kraut A, Marcellin M, Adrait A, et al. Peptide storage: are you getting the best return on your investment? Defining optimal storage conditions for proteomics samples. J Proteome Res 2009; 8(7): 3778-85.
31. Weber S. The Success of Open Source. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA 2004.
32. Knoppers BM. Genomics and policymaking: from static models to complex systems? Hum Genet 2009; 125(4): 375-9.
33. Guston D. (2007). Toward anticipatory governance. Available from: http://nanohub.org/resources/3270 [Accessed October 23, 2010].
34. Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, et al. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement and integration. In: The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J, Eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2008; pp. 979-1000.
35. Quay R. Anticipatory governance-A tool for climate change adaptation. J Am Plann Assoc 2010; 76(4): 496-511.