Molecular systematics of the Middle American genus Hypopachus (Anura: Microhylidae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 265-277

  Greenbaum, Eli ^a   Smith, Eric N ^b   de Sá, Rafael O ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

Author keywords

Central America; Frog; Mexico; Phylogenetics; Sequence divergence

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RHODOPSIN; RIBOSOME RNA; RNA 16S; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 12S;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA SEQUENCE; FROGS AND TOADS; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; HAPLOTYPE; MEXICO; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ANURA; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; HAPLOTYPES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MEXICO; PHYLOGENY; RHODOPSIN; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TEXAS;

ANURA; ARTHROLEPTIDAE; CHIASMOCLEIS; GASTROPHRYNE; HYPOPACHUS; HYPOPACHUS BARBERI; HYPOPACHUS VARIOLOSUS; MICROHYLIDAE; PHRYNOMANTIS;

EID: 80052743069     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Auffenberg W. Remarks on some Miocene anurans from Florida, with a description of a new species of Hyla. Breviora 1956, (52):1-11.
2. Bandelt H.J., Forster P., Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16:37-48.
3. Brandley M., Schmitz A., Reeder T.W. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:373-390.
4. Campbell J.A. Distribution patterns of amphibians in Middle America. Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: A Global Perspective 1999, 111-210. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. W.E. Duellman (Ed.).
5. Cope E.D. Fourth contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 1866, 18:123-132.
6. de Carvalho A.L. A preliminary synopsis of the genera of American microhylid frogs. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 1954, 555:1-19.
7. Castoe T.A., Doan T.M., Parkinson C.L. Data partitions and complex models in Bayesian analysis: the phylogeny of gymnophthalmid lizards. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:448-469.
8. Daza J.M., Smith E.N., Páez V.P., Parkinson C.L. Complex evolution in the Neotropics: the origin and diversification of the widespread genus Leptodeira (Serpentes: Colubridae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53:653-667.
9. Donnelly M.A., de Sá R.O., Guyer C. Description of the tadpoles of Gastrophryne pictiventris and Nelsonophryne aterrima (Anura: Microhylidae), with a review of morphological variation in free-swimming microhylid larvae. Am. Mus. Novit. 1990, 2976:1-19.
10. Douglas M.E., Douglas M.R., Schuett G.W., Beck D.D., Sullivan B.K. Conservation phylogenetics of helodermatid lizards using multiple molecular markers and a supertree approach. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2010, 55:153-167.
11. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
12. Duellman W.E. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America, second ed., vol. 2 2001, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York.
13. Duellman W.E., Trueb L. Biology of Amphibians 1986, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
14. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E., Quattro J.M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distance among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 1992, 131:479-491.
15. Excoffier L., Lischer H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2010, 10:564-567.
16. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
17. Fouquette M.J., Rossman D.A. Noteworthy records of Mexican amphibians and reptiles in the Florida State Museum and the Texas Natural History Collection. Herepetologica 1963, 19:185-201.
18. Frost, D.R., 2011. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.5 (31 January, 2011). American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/.
19. Frost D.R., Grant T., Faivovich J., Bain R.H., Haas A., Haddad C.F.B., de Sá R.O., Channing A., Wilkinson M., Donnellan S.C., Raxworthy C.J., Campbell J.A., Blotto B.L., Moler P., Drewes R.C., Nussbaum R.A., Lynch J.D., Green D.M., Wheeler W.C. The amphibian tree of life. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2006, (297):1-371.
20. Frost D.R., Hillis D.M. Species in concept and practice: herpetological applications. Herpetologica 1990, 46:87-104.
21. Fu Y.X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking, and background selection. Genetics 1997, 147:915-925.
22. Harpending H.C. Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Hum. Biol. 1994, 66:591-600.
23. Harpending H.C., Batzer M.A., Gurven M., Jorde L.B., Sherry S.T. Genetic traces of ancient demography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998, 95:1961-1967.
24. Heinicke M.P., Duellman W.E., Hedges S.B. Major Caribbean and Central American frog faunas originated by ancient oceanic dispersal. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 2007, 104:10092-10097.
25. Molecular Systematics 1996, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts. D.M. Hillis, C. Moritz, B. Mable (Eds.).
26. Ho S.Y.W. Calibrating molecular estimates of substitution rates and divergence times in birds. J. Avian Biol. 2007, 38:409-414.
27. Hoegg S., Vences M., Brinkmann H., Meyer A. Phylogeny and comparative substitution rates of frogs inferred from sequences of three nuclear genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:1188-1200.
28. Holman J.A. Late Pleistocene amphibians and reptiles of the Clear Creek and Ben Franklin local faunas of Texas. J. Grad. Res. Center, South. Meth. Univ. 1963, 31:152-167.
29. Holman J.A. Early Miocene anurans from Florida. Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci. 1965, 28:68-82.
30. Holman J.A. The large Pleistocene (Sangamonian) herpetofauna of the Williston IIIA site, north-central Florida. Herp. Nat. Hist. 1996, 4:35-47.
31. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
32. Keferstein W.M. Über einige neue oder seltene Batrachier aus Australien und dem tropischen Amerika. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 1867, 18:342-361.
33. Köhler G., Veselý M., Greenbaum E. The Amphibians and Reptiles of El Salvador 2006, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida.
34. Leaché A.D., Reeder T. Molecular systematics of the fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:44-68.
35. Leviton A.E., Gibbs R.H., Heal E., Dawson C.E. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology. Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology or ichthyology. Copeia 1985, 1985:802-832.
36. Loader S.P., Gower D.J., Howell K.M., Doggart N., Rödel M.-O., Clarke B.T., de Sá R.O., Cohen B.L., Wilkinson M. Phylogenetic relationships of African microhylid frogs inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes. Organ. Diver. Evol. 2004, 4:227-235.
37. Maddison D.R., Maddison W.P. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Vers. 4.08 2005, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
38. Makowsky R., Chesser J., Rissler L.J. A striking lack of genetic diversity across the wide-ranging amphibian Gastrophryne carolinensis (Anura: Microhylidae). Genetica 2009, 135:169-183.
39. McCranie J.R., Wilson L.D. The Amphibians of Honduras 2002, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York.
40. Measey G.J., Vences M., Drewes R.C., Chiari Y., Melo M., Bourles B. Freshwater paths across the ocean: molecular phylogeny of the frog Ptychadena newtoni gives insights into amphibian colonization of oceanic islands. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:7-20.
41. Mendelson J.R., Williams B.L., Sheil C.A., Mulcahy D.G. Systematics of the Bufo coccifer Complex (Anura: Bufonidae) of Mesoamerica. Sci. Pap. Nat. Hist. Mus. Univ. Kansas 2005, 38:1-27.
42. Nelson C.E. Systematic studies of the North American microhylid genus Gastrophryne. J. Herpetol. 1972, 6:111-137.
43. Nelson C.E. Gastrophryne usta (Cope), Two-spaded narrow-mouthed toad. Cat. Am. Amph. Rept. 1972, 123:1-2.
44. Nelson C.E. Gastrophryne pictiventris (Cope), Southern narrow-mouthed toad. Cat. Am. Amph. Rept. 1972, 135:1-2.
45. Nelson C.E. Systematics of the Middle American upland populations of Hypopachus (Anura: Microhylidae). Herpetologica 1973, 29:6-17.
46. Nelson C.E. Mating calls of the Microhylinae: descriptions and phylogenetic and ecological considerations. Herpetologica 1973, 29:163-176.
47. Nelson C.E. Further studies on the systematics of Hypopachus (Anura: Microhylidae). Herpetologica 1974, 30:250-274.
48. Nelson C.E., Altig R. Tadpoles of the microhylids Gastrophryne elegans and G. usta. Herpetologica 1972, 28:381-383.
49. Parker H.W. A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae 1934, British Museum (Natural History), London, United Kingdom.
50. Parra-Olea G., García-París M., Wake D.M. Molecular diversification of salamanders of the tropical American genus Bolitoglossa (Caudata: Plethodontidae) and its evolutionary and biogeographic implications. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 81:325-346.
51. Parra-Olea G., Garcia-Paris M., Papenfuss T.J., Wake D.M. Systematics of the Pseudoeurycea bellii (Caudata: Plethodontidae) species complex. Herpetologica 2005, 61:145-158.
52. Patou M.-L., Wilting A., Gaubert P., Esselstyn J.A., Cruaud C., Jennings A.P., Fickel J., Veron G. Evolutionary history of the Paradoxurus palm civets - a new model for Asian biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 2010, 37:2077-2097.
53. Pfeiler E., Markow T.A. Phylogenetic relationships of leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex) from an isolated coastal mountain range in southern Sonora, Mexico. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49:343-348.
54. Posada D. jModeltest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
55. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2007. Tracer v1.5. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
56. Rogers A.R., Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1992, 9:552-569.
57. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
58. Savage J.M. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica: A Herpetofauna Between Two Continents, Between Two Seas 2002, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
59. Schmidt K.P. New Central American frogs of the genus Hypopachus. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ., Zool. Ser. 1939, 24:1-5.
60. Shaffer H.B., Fellers G.M., Voss S.R., Oliver J.C., Pauly G.B. Species boundaries, phylogeography and conservation genetics of the red-legged frog (Rana aurora/draytonii) complex. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:2667-2677.
61. Shimodaira H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:492-508.
62. Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:1246-1247.
63. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
64. Stamatakis A., Blagojevic F., Nikolopoulos D., Antonopoulos C. Exploring new search algorithms and hardware for phylogenetics: RAxML meets the IBM cell. J. VLSI Signal Process. 2007, 48:271-286.
65. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:758-771.
66. Swofford D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other methods), Version 4.0b10 2002, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
67. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
68. Van Bocxlaer I., Roelants K., Biju S.D., Nagaraju J., Bossuyt F. Late Cretaceous vicariance in Gondwanan amphibians. PLoS ONE 2006, 1:e74.
69. Van der Meijden A., Vences M., Meyer A. Novel phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic brevicipitine and scaphiophrynine toads as revealed by sequences from the nuclear Rag-1 gene. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 271(Supplement):S378-S381.
70. Van der Meijden A., Vences M., Hoegg S., Boistel R., Channing A., Meyer A. Nuclear gene phylogeny of narrow-mouthed toads (Family: Microhylidae) and a discussion of competing hypotheses concerning their biogeographic origins. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44:1017-1030.
71. Vences M. Phylogeography of Ptychadena mascareniensis suggests transoceanic dispersal in a widespread African-Malagasy frog lineage. J. Biogeogr. 2004, 31:593-601.
72. Vences M., Kosuch J., Boistel R., Haddad C.F.B., La Marca E., Loetters S., Veith M. Convergent evolution of aposematic coloration in Neotropical poison frogs: a molecular phylogenetic perspective. Organ. Div. Evol. 2003, 3:215-226.
73. Wild E.R. New genus and species of Amazonian microhylid frog with a phylogenetic analysis of New World genera. Copeia 1995, 1995:837-849.
74. Zarza E., Reynoso V.H., Emerson B.C. Diversification in the northern neotropics: mitochondrial and nuclear DNA phylogeography of the iguana Ctenosaura pectinata and related species. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3259-3275.
75. Zhang M., Rao D., Yang J., Yu G., Wilkinson J.A. Molecular phylogeography and population structure of a mid-elevation montane frog Leptobrachium ailaonicum in fragmented habitat of southwest China. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 2010, 54:47-58.