Habermas and information systems research: New directions

Information and Organization

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 123-141

  Ross, Alain ^a   Chiasson, Mike ^b  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052740609     PISSN: 14717727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adam A. Exploring the gender question in critical information systems. Journal of Information Technology 2002, 17:59-67.
2. Alvarez R., Urla J. Tell me a good story: Using narrative analysis to examine information requirements interviews during an ERP implementation. Data Base 2001, 33(1):38-52.
3. Alvesson M., Willmott H. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review 1992, 17(3):432-464.
4. Asif Z., Klein H.K. Open and free deliberation: a prerequisite for positive deliberation. Information and Organization 2009, 19:186-197.
5. Auramäki E., Lehtinen E., Lyytinen K. A speech-act-based office modeling approach. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1988, 6(2):126-152.
6. Austin J.L. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955 1962, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Beck U. The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order 1996, Polity Press, Cambridge.
8. Borradori G. Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida 2003, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Bradley J., Lee C.C. ERP training and user satisfaction: A case study. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 2007, 3(4):33-49.
10. Brooke C. What does it mean to be 'critical' in IS research?. Journal of Information Technology 2002, 17:49-57.
11. Browne G.J., Ramesh V. Improving information requirements determination: A cognitive perspective. Information and Management 2002, 39:625-645.
12. Browne G.J., Rogich M.B. An empirical investigation of user requirements elicitation: Comparing the effectiveness of prompting techniques. Journal of Management Information Systems 2001, 17(4):223-249.
13. Cukier W., Ngwenyama O., Bauer R., Middleton C. A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: Preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis. Information Systems Journal 2009, 18:175-196.
14. Doan A., Ramakrishnan R., Halevy A.Y. Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM 2011, 54(4):86-96.
15. Ekberg M. The parameters of the risk society: A review and exploration. Current Sociology 2007, 55(3):343-366.
16. Finney S., Corbett M. ERP implementation: A compilation and analysis of critical success factors. Business Process Management Journal 2007, 13(3):329-347.
17. Flynn J. Communicative power in Habermas's theory of democracy. European Journal of Political Theory 2004, 3(4):433-454.
18. Habermas J. Knowledge and human interests 1971, (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.), Beacon, Boston, MA, [German, 1968b].
19. Habermas J. What is universal pragmatics?. On the pragmatics of communication 1976, 1998. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Cooke (Ed.).
20. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society 1984, (T. McCarthy, Trans.), Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts, [German, 1981].
21. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and system, a critique of functionalist reason 1987, (T. McCarthy, Trans.), Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts, [German, 1981].
22. Habermas J. Moral consciousness and communicative action 1990, (C. Lenhardt, & W. Nicholsen, Trans.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, [German, 1983].
23. Habermas J. Justification and application: remarks on discourse ethics 1993, (C. Cronin, Trans.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, [German, 1991].
24. Habermas J. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy 1998, (W. Rehg, Trans.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, [German, 1992].
25. Habermas J. On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action 2001, (B. Fultner, Trans.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Habermas J. The future of human nature 2003, (H. Beister, M. Pensky, & W. Rehg, Trans), Polity Press, Cambridge.
27. Hansen S., Berente N., Lyytinen K. Wikipedia, critical social theory, and the possibility of rational discourse. The Information Society 2009, 25(1):38-59.
28. Held D. Models of democracy 2006, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. 3rd edition.
29. Hirschheim R., Klein H.K. Realizing emancipatory principles in information systems development: The case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly 1994, March, 83-109.
30. Hirschheim R., Klein H.K., Lyytinen K. Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis. Accounting, Management and Information Technology 1996, 6(1/2):1-64.
31. Horster D. Habermas: An introduction 1992, (H. Thompson, Trans.), Pennbridge Books, Philadelphia.
32. Introna L. Commentary on the intellectual structures of information systems development by Hirschheim, Klein and Lyytinen. Accounting, Management and Information Technology 1996, 6(1/2):87-97.
33. Janson M.A., Woo C.C., Smith L.D. Information systems development and communicative action theory. Information and Management 1993, 25:59-72.
34. Jones S., Mason P., Stamper R. LEGOL 2.0: A relational specification language for complex rules. Information Systems 1979, 4:293-305.
35. Lindquist C. Required: Fixing the requirements mess. CIO 2005, 19(4):1.
36. McCarthy T. Translator's introduction in Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action 1984, 1. McCarthy, T. (trans).
37. McCarthy T. Introduction in Habermas. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action 1990, Lenhardt, C. and Nicholsen, S. W. (trans).
38. Metcalfe M. Argumentative systems for IS design. Information Technology and People 2002, 15(1):60-73.
39. Mingers J. Management knowledge and knowledge management: realism and forms of truth. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 2008, 6:62-76.
40. Mingers J., Walsham G. Toward ethical information systems: The contribution of discourse ethics. Management Information Systems Quarterly 2010, 34(4):833-854.
41. Mumford E. Designing human systems for new technology - The ETHICS method Retrieved July 11, 2006 from. http://www.enid.u-net.com/C1book1.htm.
42. Mumford E. The story of socio-technical design: Reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Information Systems Journal 2006, 16:317-342.
43. Myers M.D., Young L.W. Hidden agendas, power and managerial assumptions in information systems development: An Ethnographic study. Information Technology and People 1997, 10(3):224-240.
44. Ngwenyama O.K., Lee A.S. Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1997, 21(2):145-167.
45. Ocker R., Fjermestad J., Hiltz S.R., Johnson K. Effects of four modes of group communication on the outcomes of software requirements determination. Journal of Management Information Systems 1998, 15(1):99-118.
46. Olphert W., Damodaran L. Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-Government services: The missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. Journal of the Association of Information Systems 2007, 8(9):491-507.
47. Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 1992, 3(3):398-427.
48. Parmar V., Keyson D., de Bont C. Persuasive technology to shape social beliefs: A case of persuasive health information systems for rural women in India. Communications of the AIS 2009, 24:427-454.
49. Puri S.K., Sahay S., Lewis J. Building participatory HIS networks: A case study from Kerala, India. Information and Organization 2009, 19:63-83.
50. Rehg W. Translator's introduction. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy 1998, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (W. Rehg, Trans). J. Habermas (Ed.).
51. Searle J.R. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language 1969, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
52. Stacy W., MacMillian J. Cognitive bias in software engineering. Communications of the ACM 1995, 38(6):57.
53. Ulrich W. A philosophical staircase for information systems definition, design, and development: A discursive approach to reflective practice in ISD (Part 1). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 2001, 3(3):55-84.
54. Ulrich W. Critically systemic discourse: A discursive approach to reflective practice in ISD (Part 2). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 2001, 3(3):85-106.
55. Urquhart C. Exploring analyst-client communication: Using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in information requirements gathering. Information systems and qualitative research 1997, Chapman & Hall, London. A.S. Lee, J. Liebenau, J.I. DeGross (Eds.).
56. Vessey I., Conger S.A. Requirements specification: Learning object, process and data methodologies. Communications of the ACM 1994, 37(5):102-113.
57. Warnke G. Discourse ethics and feminist dilemmas of difference. Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse 1995, Routledge, New York. J. Meehan (Ed.).
58. Williams M.G., Begg V. Translation between software designers and users. Communications of the ACM 1993, 36(4):102-103.