Argumentative systems for IS design

Information Technology & People

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 60-73

  Metcalfe, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Decision making; Information systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 27544491146     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593840210421525     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Apotheloz, D., Brandt, P. and Ouiroz, G. (1993), “The function of negation in argumentation”, Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 19, pp. 23-39.
2. Armstrong, J.S. (1985), Long Range Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
3. Baker, G.P. and Huntington, H.B. (1905), The Principles of Argumentation, Ginn & Co., Boston, MA.
4. Baskerville, R. and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1998), “Diversity in action research methods”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 90-107.
5. Broad, W. and Wane, N. (1982), Betrayers of the Truth, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
6. Crosswhite, J. (1996), The Rhetoric of Reason, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
7. Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R. and Kruiger, T. (1987), Handbook of Argumentation Theory, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
8. Fischer, F. and Forrester, F. (1993), The Argumentative Turn, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
9. Fitzgerald B. (1996), “Formalized systems development methodologies”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 3-23.
10. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
11. Gimpl, M.L. and Dakin, S.R. (1984), “Management and magic”, Californian Management Review, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 125-36.
12. Habermas, J. (1990), Discourse Ethics in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Haysee, T. (1998), “Transcendence, truth and argumentation”, Inquiry, Vol. 41, pp. 411-34.
14. Hirscheim, R. et al. (1997), Control Sensemaking and Argumentation, ACIS, Melbourne.
15. Hughes, J. (1998), “Selection and evaluation of information systems methodologies”, IEE Proceedings, Vol. 145 No. 4, pp. 100-4.
16. Kuhn, D. (1991), Skills of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Mason, R.O. (1969), “A dialectical approach to strategic planning”, Management Science, Vol. 15, pp. B403-B414.
18. Metcalfe, M. (1995), “Decision making in small groups”, International Journal of Computer and Engineering Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 40-54.
19. Metcalfe, M. (2000), “Concern solving”, Working Paper, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
20. Metcalfe, M. and Powell, P. (1995), “Information: a perceiver-concerns perspective”, Communications Yearbook, Vol. 14, pp. 268-302.
21. Meyers, R.A. and Seibold, D.R. (1989), “Perspectives on group argument”, Communications Yearbook, Vol. 14, pp. 268-302.
22. Mitroff, I.I. (1972), “The myth of objectivity”, Management Science, Vol. 18, pp. B613-B618.
23. Niederman, F. and Desanctis, G. (1995), “The impact of the structured argument approach on group problem formulation”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 4.
24. Olbrecht-Tyteca, L. and Perelman, C. (1969), The New Rhetoric, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
25. Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969), The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
26. Piaget, J. (1973), Psychology and Epistemology, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
27. Popper, K.R. (1971), The Open Society and Its Enemies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
28. Schon, D. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York, NY.
29. Scult, A. (1999), “Heidegger on Aristotle”, available at: www.mac.drake.edu/s/scult/heidegger-on-aristotle.html
30. Toulmin, (1964), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Tracey, T.J.G. and Glidden-Tracey, C.E. (1999), “Integration theory, research design, measurement and analysis”, Counselling Psychologist, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 299-324.
32. Ulrich, W. (1983), Critical Heuristics of Social Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
33. Walker, G.B. and Daniels, S.E. (1993), Argument and Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems, Working Paper, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
34. Walton, D. (1998), The New Dialectic, Toronto University Press, Toronto.
35. Wastell, D.G. (1996), “The fetish of technique”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 25-40.
36. Weick, K.E. (1983,) “Managerial thought in the context of action”, in Bennis, W., Mason, R.O. and Mitroff, I.I. et al. (Eds), The Executive Mind, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
37. Ziegelmueller, G.W. and Dause, C.A. (1975), Argumentation: Inquiry and Advocacy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.