Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spine

Techniques in Orthopaedics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 146-155

  Chaudhary, Kshitij S ^a   Groff, Michael W ^a  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

mini open; minimally invasive; transforaminal interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

BACKACHE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR DISK HERNIA; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MORBIDITY; POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADICULOPATHY; REVIEW; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052704816     PISSN: 08859698     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BTO.0b013e31822ce25d     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Cloward RB. The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion I: indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg. 1953;10:154-168.
2. Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1982;120:343-347. (Pubitemid 12098700)
3. Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:551-558. (Pubitemid 41159462)
4. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):S166-S171.
5. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine. 2003;28(15 Suppl):S26-S35. (Pubitemid 36959580)
6. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N. 1987 Volvo award in basic science: the morphology of the lumbar erector spinae. Spine. 1987;12:658-668. (Pubitemid 17147048)
7. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine. 1996;21:2683-2688. (Pubitemid 26419106)
8. Kim CW. Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery. Spine. 2010;35(26 Suppl):S281-S286.
9. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljärvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine. 1993;18:575-581. (Pubitemid 23125026)
10. Kim D, Lee S, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 2005;30:123-129. (Pubitemid 40209288)
11. Lai P, Chen L, Niu C, et al. Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation. Spine. 2004;29:2527-2532; discussion 2532. (Pubitemid 40353274)
12. McAfee PC, Phillips FM, Andersson G, et al. Minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine. 2010;35(26 Suppl):S271-S273.
13. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int. 2010;1:12.
14. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011. Feb 17. [Epub ahead of print].
15. Park P, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg focus. 2008;25:E16.
16. Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:288-296.
17. Karikari IO, Grossi PM, Nimjee SM, et al. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion in patients over seventy years of age: analysis of peri-and post-operative complications. Neurosurgery. 2011;1.
18. Rosen DS, Ferguson SD, Ogden AT, et al. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:956-960; discussion 960.
19. Selznick LA, Shamji MF, et al. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:207-213.
20. Wu RH, Fraser JF, Härtl R. Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates. Spine. 2010;35:2273-2281.
21. Chen N, Smith ZA, Stiner E, et al. Symptomatic ectopic bone formation after off-label use of recombinant human bone morphoge-netic protein-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12:40-46.
22. Deutsch H, Musacchio MJ. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Neurosurg focus. 2006;20:E10.
23. Beringer WF, Mobasser J. Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg focus. 2006;20:E4.
24. Anand N, Hamilton JF, Perri B, et al. Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome. Spine. 2006;31:E748-E753. (Pubitemid 44423517)
25. Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, et al. Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:316-324.
26. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:92-97. (Pubitemid 44284152)
27. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:98-105.
28. Ntoukas V, Müller A. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010;53:21-24.
29. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9:560-565.
30. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1683-1688.
31. Peng CWB, Yue WM, Poh SY, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2009;34:1385-1389.
32. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, et al. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1780-1784.
33. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine. 2010;35:1615-1620.
34. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, et al. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:623-628.
35. Fourney DR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC, et al. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion? Spine. 2010;35(9 Suppl): S57-S65.
36. Bagan B, Patel N, Deutsch H, et al. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques. Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:281-286.
37. Mcgirt MJ, Parker SL, Lerner J, et al. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;1-8.
38. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Witham TF, et al. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54:33-37.
39. Neal CJ, Rosner MK. Resident learning curve for minimal-access transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in a military training program. Neurosurg focus. 2010;28:E21.
40. Benzel EC, Orr RD. A steep learning curve is a good thing! Spine J. 2011;11:131-132.
41. Bindal RK, Glaze S, Ognoskie M, et al. Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9:570-573.
42. Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, et al. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12:694-699