Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1385-1389

  Peng, Chan Wearn Benedict ^a   Yue, Wai Mun ^a   Poh, Seng Yew ^a   Yeo, William ^a   Tan, Seang Beng ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Clinical outcomes; Lumbar fusion; Minimally invasive techniques

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; BACK PAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67749086632     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Stonecipher T, Wright S. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with facet-screw fixation. Spine 1989;14:468-471 (Pubitemid 19129738)
2. Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stage procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1982;120:343-347
3. Moskowitz A. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 2002;33:359-366
4. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 2001;48:569-575 (Pubitemid 32199606)
5. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, et al. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine 1998;23:1267-1279
6. McAfee PC, Regan JR, Zdeblick T, et al. The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine 1995; 20:1624-1632
7. McDonnell MF, Glassman SD, Dimar JR II, et al. Perioperative complications of anterior procedures of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78: 839-847
8. Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, et al. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 1999; 91:60-64
9. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 2000; 25:1437-1446
10. Elias WJ, Simmons NE, Kaptain GJ, et al. Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium-threaded cage device. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2000;93:45-52. (Pubitemid 30457381)
11. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 1996;21:941-944 (Pubitemid 26127214)
12. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 1996;21: 2683-2688 (Pubitemid 26419106)
13. Wetzel FT, LaRocca H. The failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 1991;16:839-845
14. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999;24:1023-1028 (Pubitemid 29222625)
15. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, et al. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 1993;18: 568-574 (Pubitemid 23125025)
16. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljiarvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 1993;18: 575-581 (Pubitemid 23125026)
17. Styf JR, Willen J. The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 1998;23:354-358 (Pubitemid 28109862)
18. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, et al. Anterior fresh frozen allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine 1995;20:1410-1418
19. Arai Y, Takahashi M, Kurosawa H, et al. Comparative study of iliac bone graft and carbon cage with local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2002;10:1-7. (Pubitemid 35332416)
20. Hee HT, Castro FP Jr, Majd ME, et al. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:533-540 (Pubitemid 33131353)
21. Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB, et al. Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:355-361 (Pubitemid 35403091)
22. Whitecloud TS III, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a fi- nancial analysis. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:100-103. (Pubitemid 32274098)
23. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2001;26: 567-571 (Pubitemid 32224291)