The evaluation of soybean meals from 3 major soybean-producing countries on productive performance and feeding value of pig diets

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2768-2773

  Wang, J P ^a   Hong, S M ^a   Yan, L ^a   Cho, J H ^a   Lee, H S ^b   Kim, I H ^a  

^a Dankook University   (South Korea)

^b American Soybean Association International Marketing   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Feeding value; Meat quality; Nutrient digestibility; Soybean meal

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; DIET; DIGESTION; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INDIA; MEAT; METABOLISM; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PHYSIOLOGY; SOYBEAN; STANDARD; SWINE; UNITED STATES;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; BRAZIL; DIET; DIGESTION; FEMALE; INDIA; MEAT; NUTRITIVE VALUE; SOYBEANS; SWINE; UNITED STATES;

GLYCINE MAX; SUIDAE;

EID: 80052661729     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-1800     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AOAC. 1995. Official Method of Analysis. 16th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Washington, DC.
2. AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Gaithersburg, MD.
3. Apple, J. K., C. V. Maxwell, D. C. Brown, K. G. Friesen, R. E. Musser, Z. B. Johnson, and T. A. Armstrong. 2004. Effects of dietary lysine and energy density on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs fed ractopamine. J. Anim. Sci. 82:3277-3287.
4. Araba, M., and N. M. Dale. 1990. Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of overprocessing soybean meal. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 69:76-83.
5. ASA. 2002. Soy Stats. A Reference Guide to Important Soybean Facts and Figures. Am. Soybean Assoc., St. Louis, MO.
6. ASA. 2010. Soy Stats. A Reference Guide to Important Soybean Facts and Figures. Am. Soybean Assoc., St. Louis, MO.
7. Baker, K. M., and H. H. Stein. 2009. Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal produced from conventional, high-protein, or low-oligosaccharide varieties of soybeans and fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2282-2290.
8. Cromwell, G. L. 2000. Utilization of soy products in swine diets. Pages 258-282 in Soy in Animal Nutrition. J. K. Drackley, ed. Fed. Anim. Sci. Soc., Savoy, IL.
9. Fenton, T. W., and M. Fenton. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and faeces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634.
10. Goerl, K. F., S. J. Eilert, R. W. Mandigo, H. Y. Chen, and P. S. Miller. 1995. Pork characteristics as affected by two populations of swine and six crude protein levels. J. Anim. Sci. 73:3621-3626.
11. Grieshop, C. M., and G. C. Fahey Jr. 2001. Comparison of quality characteristics of soybean meals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60:437-442.
12. Grieshop, C. M., C. T. Kadzere, G. M. Clapper, E. A. Flickinger, L. L. Bauer, R. L. Frazier, and G. C. Fahey Jr. 2003. Chemical and nutritional characteristics of United States soybeans and soybean meals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:7684-7691.
13. Honikel, K. O., C. J. Kim, R. Hamm, and P. Roncales. 1986. Sarcomere shortening of prerigor muscle and its influence on drip loss. Meat Sci. 16:267-282.
14. Karr-Lilienthal, L. K., N. R. Merchen, C. M. Grieshop, M. A. Flahaven, D. C. Mahan, N. D. Fastinger, M. Watts, and G. C. Fahey Jr. 2004. Ileal amino acid digestibilities by pigs fed soybean meals from five major soybean-producing countries. J. Anim. Sci. 82:3198-3209.
15. Kauffman, R. G., G. Eikelenboom, P. G. van der Wal, B. Engel, and M. Zaar. 1986. A comparison of methods to estimate water-holding capacity in post-rigor porcine muscle. Meat Sci. 18:307-322.
16. Kim, I. H., J. D. Hancock, D. B. Jones, and P. G. Reddy. 1999. Extrusion processing of low-inhibitor soybeans improves growth performance of early-weaned pigs. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 12:1251-1257.
17. Knowles, T. A., L. L. Southern, T. D. Bidner, B. J. Kerr, and K. G. Friesen. 1998. Effect of dietary fiber or fat in low-crude protein, crystalline amino acid-supplemented diets for finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2818-2832.
18. NPPC. 2000. Composition & Quality Assessment Procedures. E. Berg, ed. Natl. Pork Prod. Council, Des Moines, IA.
19. Park, H. S., and C. R. Hurburgh Jr. 2002. Improving the U.S. position in world soybean meal trade. MATRIC Working Paper 02-MWP 7. Accessed May 10, 2009. http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/DBS/PDFFiles/02mwp7.pdf.
20. Shriver, J. A., S. D. Carter, B. W. Senne, and L. A. Pettey. 1999. Effects of adding wheat midds to low crude protein, amino acid supplemented diets for finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 77(Suppl. 1):189. (Abstr.)
21. Shriver, J. A., S. D. Carter, A. L. Sutton, B. T. Richert, B. W. Senne, and L. A. Pettey. 2003. Effects of adding fiber sources to reduced-crude protein, amino-supplemented diets on nitrogen excretion, growth performance, and carcass traits of finishing pigs. Anim. Sci. 81:492-502.
22. Thakur, M., and C. R. Hurburgh. 2007. Quality of US soybean compared to the quality of soybean meal from other origins. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 84:835-843.
23. USDA. 2009. Oilseeds: World markets and trade. Agric. Marketing Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
24. van Kempen, T. A. T. G., E. van Heugten, A. J. Moeser, N. S. Muley, and V. J. H. Sewalt. 2006. Selecting soybean meal characteristics preferred for swine nutrition. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1387-1395.
25. Witte, D. P., M. Ellis, F. K. McKeith, and E. R. Wilson. 2000. Effects of dietary lysine levels and environmental temperature during the finishing phase on the intramuscular fat content of pork. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1272-1276.