SALGOT - Stroke Arm Longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg, prospective cohort study protocol

BMC Neurology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Alt Murphy, Margit ^a   Persson, Hanna C ^a   Danielsson, Anna ^a   Broeren, Jurgen ^a   Lundgren Nilsson, Åsa ^a   Sunnerhagen, Katharina S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Kinematics; Longitudinal study; Recovery of function; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SPASTICITY; STROKE; STROKE UNIT; SWEDEN; URBAN AREA; ADULT; AGED; ARM; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EGO; FEMALE; GESTURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REALITY TESTING; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS; UNIVERSITIES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052640374     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-56     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Riks-Stroke. Årsrapport 2009. The Swedish Stroke register. [cited 2011-01-26]., http://www.riks-stroke.org/content/analyser/Rapport09.pdf
2. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999, 21(8):357-364. 10.1080/096382899297459, 10503976.
3. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75(4):394-398. 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9, 8172497.
4. Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med 1986, 8(2):69-73.
5. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, Cox Steck GA, Spichiger R, Vereeck LE, Putman KD, Van Hoydonck GA. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke 1998, 29(4):785-792.
6. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 2005, 36(7):1480-1484. 10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f, 15947263.
7. Carr J, Shepherd RB. Neurological rehabilitation, optimizing motor performance. 1998, Oxford: Butterwrth, Heineman.
8. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999, 354(9174):191-196. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09477-X, 10421300.
9. Williams BK, Galea MP, Winter AT. What is the functional outcome for the upper limb after stroke?. Aust J Physiother 2001, 47(1):19-27.
10. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004, 22(3-5):281-299.
11. Dobkin BH. Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007, 21(1):3-13. 10.1177/1545968306297329, 17172549.
12. Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83(11):1629-1637. 10.1053/apmr.2002.35473, 12422337.
13. Katrak P, Bowring G, Conroy P, Chilvers M, Poulos R, McNeil D. Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79(7):758-761. 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90352-5, 9685087.
14. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, Thijs V, Dobbelaere J, Devos H, Severijns D, Vanbeveren S, De Weerdt W. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22(2):173-179.
15. Mirbagheri MM, Rymer WZ. Time-course of changes in arm impairment after stroke: variables predicting motor recovery over 12 months. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89(8):1507-1513. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.017, 18586221.
16. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992, 23(8):1084-1089.
17. Welmer AK, Holmqvist LW, Sommerfeld DK. Limited fine hand use after stroke and its association with other disabilities. J Rehabil Med 2008, 40(8):603-608. 10.2340/16501977-0218, 19020692.
18. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 2001, 32(6):1279-1284.
19. Mirbagheri MM, Tsao CC, Rymer WZ. Changes of elbow kinematics and kinetics during 1 year after stroke. Muscle Nerve 2008, 37(3):387-395. 10.1002/mus.20965, 18236457.
20. Wagner JM, Lang CE, Sahrmann SA, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW. Sensorimotor impairments and reaching performance in subjects with poststroke hemiparesis during the first few months of recovery. Phys Ther 2007, 87(6):751-765. 10.2522/ptj.20060135, 17442839.
21. Trombly CA, Wu CY. Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 1999, 53(4):333-344.
22. Murphy MA, Sunnerhagen KS, Johnels B, Willen C. Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2006, 3:18.
23. Murphy MA, Willén C, Sunnerhagen KS. Kinematic Variables Quantifying Upper-Extremity Performance After Stroke During Reaching and Drinking From a Glass. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2010, 1-11.
24. Crosbie JH, Lennon S, McNeill MD, McDonough SM. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: the user's perspective. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006, 9(2):137-141. 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.137, 16640466.
25. Swapp D, Pawar V, Loscos C. Interaction with co-located haptic feedback in virtual reality. Virtual Reality 2006, 10(1):24-30.
26. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007, 14(2):52-61. 10.1310/tsr1402-52, 17573312.
27. Boian R, Sharma A, Han C, Merians A, Burdea G, Adamovich S, Recce M, Tremaine M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002, 85:64-70.
28. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004, 1(1):11. 10.1186/1743-0003-1-11, 546398, 15679937.
29. Broeren J, Claesson L, Goude D, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for community-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008, 26(3):289-296. 10.1159/000149576, 18667809.
30. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Bjorkdahl A, Sunnerhagen KS. Assessment and training in a 3-dimensional virtual environment with haptics: a report on 5 cases of motor rehabilitation in the chronic stage after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007, 21(2):180-189. 10.1177/1545968306290774, 17312093.
31. Broeren J, Sunnerhagen KS, Rydmark M. A kinematic analysis of a haptic handheld stylus in a virtual environment: a study in healthy subjects. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007, 4:13. 10.1186/1743-0003-4-13, 1877808, 17490470.
32. WHO International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. 2001, Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, WHO.
33. Barkelius K, Johansson A, Korm K, Lindmark B. Reliabilitets- och validitetsprövning av Modifierad Motor Assessment Scale enligt Uppsala Akademiska Sjukhus -95. Nordisk Fysioterapi 1997, 29:161-165.
34. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981, 4(4):483-492. 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001, 7333761.
35. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993, 24(1):35-41.
36. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991, 337(8756):1521-1526. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-O, 1675378.
37. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003, 49(2):156-163. 10.1002/art.10993, 12687505.
38. Denvall V, Elmstahl S, Prigatano GP. Replication and construct validation of the Barrow Neurological Institute Screen for Higher Cerebral Function with a Swedish population. J Rehabil Med 2002, 34(4):153-157. 10.1080/16501970213231, 12201609.
39. Grimby G. Physical activity and muscle training in the elderly. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1986, 711:233-237.
40. Mattiasson-Nilo I, Sonn U, Johannesson K, Gosman-Hedstrom G, Persson GB, Grimby G. Domestic activities and walking in the elderly: evaluation from a 30-hour heart rate recording. Aging (Milano) 1990, 2(2):191-198.
41. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975, 7(1):13-31.
42. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983, 63(10):1606-1610.
43. van Wijck FM, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Barnes MP. Assessing motor deficits in neurological rehabilitation: patterns of instrument usage. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2001, 15(1):23-30. 10.1177/154596830101500104, 11527276.
44. Lyle R. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981, 4(4):483-492. 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001, 7333761.
45. Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22(1):78-90.
46. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing 1998, 27(2):107-113. 10.1093/ageing/27.2.107, 16296669.
47. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med 2001, 33(3):110-113. 10.1080/165019701750165916, 11482350.
48. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 82(1):14-19. 10.1053/apmr.2001.18668, 11239280.
49. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987, 67(2):206-207.
50. Gregson JM, Leathley MJ, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK, Watkins CL. Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing 2000, 29(3):223-228. 10.1093/ageing/29.3.223, 10855904.
51. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985, 66(2):69-74.
52. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984, 9(2):222-226.
53. Murphy MA, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS. Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011, 25(1):71-80. 10.1177/1545968310370748, 20829411.
54. Murphy MA, Sunnerhagen KS, Johnels B, Willen C. Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006, 3:18. 10.1186/1743-0003-3-18, 1562432, 16914057.
55. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2004, 85(8):1247-1250. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.020, 15295748.
56. Broeren J, Bjorkdahl A, Pascher R, Rydmark M. Virtual reality and haptics as an assessment device in the postacute phase after stroke. Cyberpsychol Behav 2002, 5(3):207-211. 10.1089/109493102760147196, 12123242.
57. Broeren J, Sunnerhagen KS, Rydmark M. A kinematic analysis of a haptic handheld stylus in a virtual environment: a study in healthy subjects. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 2007, 4:13.
58. Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, Zancan A, Thonnard JL. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke 2001, 32(7):1627-1634.
59. Penta M, Thonnard JL, Tesio L. ABILHAND: a Rasch-built measure of manual ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79(9):1038-1042. 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90167-8, 9749680.
60. Gustafsson S, Sunnerhagen K, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. Occupational therapist's and patients's perception of ABILHAND, a new assessment tool for measuring manual ability. Scand J Occup Ther 2004, 11:107-117.
61. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999, 30(10):2131-2140.
62. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84(7):950-963. 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2, 12881816.
63. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 82(2):210-216. 10.1053/apmr.2001.18218, 11239312.
64. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999, 13(5):411-419. 10.1191/026921599668601325, 10498348.
65. Kersten P, Cardol M, George S, Ward C, Sibley A, White B. Validity of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: a comparison between two countries. Disabil Rehabil 2007, 29(19):1502-1509. 10.1080/09638280601030066, 17852246.
66. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001, 33(5):337-343. 10.3109/07853890109002087, 11491192.
67. Euroqol Euro-Qol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990, 16:199-208. Euroqol.
68. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intellegence and attainment tests. 1980, Chicago: Chicago University Press.