Changes of elbow kinematics and kinetics during 1 year after stroke

Muscle and Nerve

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 387-395

  Mirbagheri, Mehdi M ^a,b   Tsao, Cheng Chi ^b   Rymer, W Zev ^a,b  

^a REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Kinematics; Kinetics; Motor impairment; Prediction; Recovery; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; ELBOW; FEMALE; FORCE; FUGL MEYER SCALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; STROKE; SURVIVOR; TIME; VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; ELBOW; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 39749139765     PISSN: 0148639X     EISSN: 10974598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mus.20965     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 1964;192:540-542.
2. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc 1977;39:1-38.
3. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992;23:1084-1089.
4. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1181-1188.
5. Fugl-Meyer AR. Assessment of motor function in the hemiparetic patients. In: Buerger AA, Tobis JS, editors. Neurophysiologic aspects of rehabilitation medicine. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas; 1976. p 231-250.
6. Gilman S. Time course of outcome of recovery from stroke: relevance to stem cell treatment. Exp Neurol 2006;199:37-41.
7. Gresham GE. Stroke outcome research. Stroke 1986;17:358-362.
8. Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629-1637.
9. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406-412.
10. Kawakkel G, Boudewijn K, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2348-2353.
11. Li F, Duncan TE, Hops H. Examining developmental trajectories in adolescent alcohol use using piecewise growth mixture modeling analysis. J Stud Alcohol 2001;62:199-210.
12. Muthen B. Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In: Kaplan D, editor. Hand book of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2004. p 345-368.
13. Newman M. The process of recovery after hemiplegia. Stroke 1972;3:702-710.
14. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood DE, van Wijck FM, Burridge JH, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:2-6.
15. Proust-Lima C, Leternneur L, Jacqmin-Gadda H. A nonlinear latent class model for joint analysis of multivariate longitudinal data and a binary outcome. Stat Med 2006;26:2229-2245.
16. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Kerbs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, et al. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 2002;22:8297-8304.
17. Tsao C, Mirbagheri MM. Upper limb impairments associated with spasticity in neurological disorders. J Neuroeng Rehabil (in press).
18. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Somotosensory recovery: a longitudinal study of the first 6 months after unilateral stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:293-299.
19. Young RR. Spasticity: a review. Neurology 1994;44(suppl):S12-20.