Transcription factor binding site positioning in yeast: Proximal promoter motifs characterize Tata-Less promoters

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Erb, Ionas ^a   van Nimwegen, Erik ^b  

^a CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TATA BINDING PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING MOTIF; FUNGAL GENE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; YEAST; ALGORITHM; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIF; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES; TATA BOX; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; BINDING SITES; GENOME, FUNGAL; NUCLEOSOMES; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIFS; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TATA BOX; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

EID: 80052605861     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024279     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Robert F, Odom DT, Bar-Jospeh Z, et al. (2002) Transcription regulatory neworks in Saccharomyces cerivisiae. Science pp. 799-804.
2. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, et al. (2004) Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431: 99-104.
3. Zhu C, Byers K, McCord R, Shi Z, Berger M, et al. (2009) High-resolution DNa-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. Genome Res 19: 556-566.
4. Macisaac KD, Wang T, Gordon BD, Gifford DK, Stormo GD, et al. (2006) An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 113.
5. Pachkov M, Erb I, Molina N, van Nimwegen E, (2007) SwissRegulon: a database of genome-wide annotations of regulatory sites. Nucl Acids Res 35: D127-131.
6. Guelzim N, Bottani S, Bourgine P, Kepes F, (2002) Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network. Nat Genet 31: 60-63.
7. Maslov S, Sneppen K, (2005) Computational architecture of the yeast regulatory network. Phys Biol 2: S94-100.
8. Erb I, van Nimwegen E, (2006) Statistical features of yeast's transcriptional regulatory code. IEEE Proceedings first International Conference on Computational Systems Biology (ICCSB 2006) pp. 112-118.
9. Balaji S, Baby M, Iyer L, Luscombe N, Aravind L, (2006) Comprehensive analysis of combinatorial regulation using the transcriptional regulatory network of yeast. J Mol Biol 360: 213-27.
10. Zhang Z, Dietrich FS, (2005) Mapping of transcription start sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 5′ SAGE. Nucl Acids Res 33: 2838-2851.
11. Miura F, Kawaguchi N, Sese J, Toyoda A, Hattori M, et al. (2006) A large-scale full-length cDNA analysis to explore the budding yeast transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 17846-17851.
12. David L, Huber W, Granovskaia M, Toedlinger J, Palm CJ, et al. (2006) A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. PNAS 103: 5320-5325.
13. Nagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, Shou C, Raha D, et al. (2008) The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome de_ned by rna sequencing. Science 320: 1344-1349.
14. Carninci P, Sandelin A, Lenhard B, Katayama S, Shimokawa K, et al. (2006) Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution. Nat Genet 38: 626-635.
15. Basehoar A, Pugh B, (2004) Identification and distinct regulation of yeast tata box-containing genes. Cell 116: 699-709.
16. Kuehner J, Brow D, (2006) Quantitative analysis of in vivo initiator selection by yeast RNA polymerase II supports a scanning model. J Biol Chem 281: 14119-14128.
17. Sugihara F, Kasahara K, Kokubo T, (2011) Highly redundant function of multiple AT-rich sequences as core promoter elements in the TATA-less RPS5 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 59-75.
18. Siddharthan R, Siggia ED, van Nimwegen E, (2005) Phylogibbs: A gibbs sampling motif finder that incorporates phylogeny. PLoS Comput Biol 1: e67.
19. van Nimwegen E, (2007) Finding regulatory elements and regulatory motifs: a general probabilistic framework. BMC Bioinformatics 8: S4.
20. Sudarsanam P, Pilpel Y, Church G, (2002) Genome-wide co-occurrence of promoter elements reveals a cis-regulatory cassette of rRNA transcription motifs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res 12: 1723-31.
21. Landry C, Lemos B, Rifkin S, Dickinson W, Hartl D, (2007) Genetic properties inuencing the evolvability of gene expression. Science 317: 118-21.
22. Ioshikhes I, Albert I, Zanton S, Pugh B, (2006) Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat Genet 38: 1210-5.
23. Tirosh I, Barkai N, (2008) Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. Genome Res 18: 1084-1091.
24. Lee W, Nislow C, (2007) A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 39: 1235-1244.
25. Guo Z, Sherman F, (1996) 3′-end-forming signals of yeast mRNA. Trends Biochem Sci 21: 477-81.
26. van Helden J, del Olmo M, Perez-Ortin J, (2000) Statistical analysis of yeast genomic downstream sequences reveals putative polyadenylation signals. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 1000-1010.
27. Graber J, McAllister G, Smith T, (2002) Probabilistic prediction of saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA 3′-processing sites. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1851-1858.
28. Venters B, Pugh B, (2009) A canonical promoter organization of the transcription machinery and its regulators in the Saccharomyces genome. Genome Res 19: 360-371.
29. O'Sullivan J, Tan-Wong S, Morillon A, Lee B, Mellor JCJ, et al. (2004) Gene loops juxtapose promoters and terminators in yeast. Nat Genet 36: 1014-1018.
30. Mavrich T, Ioshikhes I, Venters B, Jiang C, Tomsho L, et al. (2008) A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res 18: 1073-1083.
31. Hampsey M, (2006) The pol II initiation complex: Finding a place to start. Nature Struc Mol Biol 13: 564-566.
32. Frith M, Valen E, Krogh A, Hayashizaki Y, Carninci P, et al. (2008) A code for transcription initiation in mammalian genomes. Genome Res 18: 1-12.
33. Yang C, Bolotin E, Jiang T, Sladek FM, Martinez E, (2007) Prevalence of the initiator over the TATA box in human and yeast genes and identi_cation of DNA motifs enriched in human TATA-less core promoters. Gene 389: 52-65.
34. Zhang Y, Moqtaderi Z, Rattner BP, Euskirchen G, Snyder M, et al. (2009) Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 847-852.
35. Segal E, Widom J, (2009) What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet 25: 335-343.
36. Stein A, Takasuka TE, Collings CK, (2010) Are nucleosome positions in vivo primarily determined by histone-DNA sequence preferences? Nucleic Acids Res 38: 709-719.
37. Kaplan N, Hughes TR, Lieb JD, Widom J, Segal E, (2010) Contribution of histone sequence preferences to nucleosome organization: proposed definitions and methodology. Genome Biol 11: 140.
38. Locke G, Tolkunov D, Moqtaderi Z, Struhl K, Morozov AV, (2010) High-throughput sequencing reveals a simple model of nucleosome energetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 20998-21003.
39. Kim S, Wilmes-Riesenberg M, Wanner B, (1996) Involvement of the sensor kinase envz in the in vivo activation of the response-regulator phob by acetyl phosphate. Mol Microbiol 22: 135-137.
40. Smale S, Kadonaga JT, (2003) The RNA polymerase II core promoter. Annu Rev Biochem 72: 449-479.
41. Magasanik B, Kaiser CA, (2002) Nitrogen regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 290: 1-18.
42. Beck T, Hall MN, (1999) The TOR signalling pathway controls nuclear localization of nutrient-regulated transcription factors. Nature 402: 689-692.
43. Bertram PG, Choi JH, Carvalho J, Ai W, Zeng C, et al. (2000) Tripartite regulation of Gln3p by TOR, Ure2p, and phosphatases. J Biol Chem 275: 35727-35733.
44. Coffman JA, Rai R, Loprete DM, Cunningham T, Svetlov V, et al. (1997) Cross regulation of four GATA factors that control nitrogen catabolic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 179: 3416-3429.
45. Cox KH, Rai R, Distler M, Daugherty JR, Coffman JA, et al. (2000) Saccharomyces cerevisiae GATA sequences function as TATA elements during nitrogen catabolite repression and when Gln3p is excluded from the nucleus by overproduction of Ure2p. J Biol Chem 275: 17611-17618.
46. Pierce M, Benjamin KR, Montano SP, Georgiadis MM, Winter E, et al. (2003) Sum1 and Ndt80 proteins compete for binding to middle sporulation element sequences that control meiotic gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 23: 4814-4825.
47. Shin ME, Skokotas A, Winter E, (2010) The Cdk1 and Ime2 protein kinases trigger exit from meiotic prophase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by inhibiting the Sum1 transcriptional repressor. Mol Cell Biol 30: 2996-3003.
48. Kastaniotis AJ, Zitomer RS, (2000) Rox1 mediated repression. Oxygen dependent repression in yeast. Adv Exp Med Biol 475: 185-195.
49. Zhu G, Spellman PT, Volpe T, Brown PO, Botstein D, et al. (2000) Two yeast forkhead genes regulate the cell cycle and pseudohyphal growth. Nature 406: 90-94.
50. Hollenhorst PC, Pietz G, Fox CA, (2001) Mechanisms controlling differential promoter-occupancy by the yeast forkhead proteins Fkh1p and Fkh2p: implications for regulating the cell cycle and differentiation. Genes Dev 15: 2445-2456.
51. Sherriff JA, Kent NA, Mellor J, (2007) The Isw2 chromatin-remodeling ATPase cooperates with the Fkh2 transcription factor to repress transcription of the B-type cyclin gene CLB2. Mol Cell Biol 27: 2848-2860.
52. Lippman SI, Broach JR, (2009) Protein kinase A and TORC1 activate genes for ribosomal biogenesis by inactivating repressors encoded by Dot6 and its homolog Tod6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 19928-19933.
53. Xie Y, Varshavsky A, (2001) RPN4 is a ligand, substrate, and transcriptional regulator of the 26S proteasome: a negative feedback circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 3056-3061.
54. Wang X, Xu H, Ju D, Xie Y, (2008) Disruption of Rpn4-induced proteasome expression in Saccha-romyces cerevisiae reduces cell viability under stressed conditions. Genetics 180: 1945-1953.
55. Cliften P, Sudarsanam P, Desikan A, Fulton L, Fulton B, et al. (2003) Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 301: 71-76.
56. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES, (2003) Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423: 241-254.
57. Notredame C, Higgins D, Heringa J, (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 302: 205-217.
58. Wade C, Shea KA, Jensen RV, McAlear MA, (2001) EBP2 is a member of the yeast RRB regulon, a transcriptionally coregulated set of genes that are required for ribosome and rRNA biosynthesis. Mol Cell Biol 21: 8638-8650.
59. Zhu J, Zhang MQ, (1999) SCPD: a promoter database of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics 15: 607-611.
60. van Nimwegen E, Zavolan M, Rajewsky N, Siggia ED, (2002) Probabilistic clustering of sequences: Inferring new bacterial regulons by comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 7323-7328.