Salmonellosis outbreak due to Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 14b resistant to nalidixic acid, Austria, September 2010

Eurosurveillance

Volumn 16, Issue 34, 2011, Pages

  Hrivniakova L ^a   Schmid, D ^a   Luckner Hornischer, A ^b   Lassnig, H ^a   Kornschober, C ^a   Angermayer, J ^b   Allerberger, F ^a  

^a AUSTRIAN AGENCY FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY   (Austria)

^b Provincial Government of Tyrol   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NALIDIXIC ACID;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; BACTERIAL TRANSMISSION; BACTERIOPHAGE TYPING; BACTERIUM CARRIER; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDEMIC; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; INFECTION CONTROL; INFECTION PREVENTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLOSIS; VARIABLE NUMBER OF TANDEM REPEAT;

EID: 80052581779     PISSN: 1025496X     EISSN: 15607917     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2003/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the monitoring of zoonoses and zoonotic agents, amending Council Decision 90/424/EEC and repealing Council Directive 92/117/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union. 12 Dec 2003. Available from: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:325:0031:0040:EN:PDF
2. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The Community Summary Report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. EFSA Journal. 2010;8(1):1496. Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1496.pdf
3. Guérin PJ, Nygard K, Siitonen A, Vold L, Kuusi M, de Jong B, et al. Emerging Salmonella Enteritidis anaerogenic phage type 14b: Outbreak in Norwegian, Swedish and Finnish travellers returning from Greece. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(2):pii=599. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle. aspx?ArticleId=599
4. O'Brien S, Ward L. Outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 14b in the United Kingdom - second update. Euro Surveill. 2002;6(43):pii=1934. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=1934
5. Health Protection Agency (HPA). S. Enteritidis infections in England in 2009: national case control study report. London: HPA. Health Protection Report. 4(6). 12 Feb 2010. Available from: http://www.hpa.org.uk/hpr/archives/2010/news0610.htm#pt14b
6. Grimont PA, Weill FX. Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella. 9th ed. Paris: Pasteur Institute. 2007. Available from: http://www.pasteur.fr/ip/portal/action/WebdriveActionEvent/oid/01s-000036-089
7. Anonymous. Guideline for Detection of Salmonella. In: Standardization and Quality Assurance in Clinical Microbiology. BMSG 2001; 2: 11-12. 8. [Accessed 31 Jan, 2011]. German. Available from: http://www.lkh-leoben.at/cms/dokumente/10002410_2148978/5ea41f2a/RL_Mikrobiologie_V01.pdf
8. Brewer JA, Turner AG. Replicating Rodac plates for identifying and enumerating bacterial contamination. Health Lab Sci. 1973;10(3):195-202.
9. Anonymous. Austrian Directive 100. Poultry Directive 2007, 2007. German. Available from: http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnum mer=20005323
10. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6579:2002/ Amd 1:2007. Annex D: Detection of Salmonella spp. in animal faeces and in environmental samples from the primary production stage. Geneva 2007
11. Beranek A, Mikula C, Rabold P, Arnhold D, Berghold C, Lederer I, et al. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis for subtyping of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis. Int J Med Microbiol. 2009;299(1):43-51.
12. Ribot EM, Fair MA, Gautom R, Cameron DN, Hunter SB, Swaminathan B, et al. Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157: H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for Pulse Net. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006;3(1):59-67.
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Multistate outbreak of Salmonella serotype Agona infections linked to toasted oats cereal--United States, April-May, 1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47(22):462-4.
14. Rushdy AA, Stuart JM, Ward LR, Bruce J, Threlfall EJ, Punia P, et al. National outbreak of Salmonella senftenberg associated with infant food. Epidemiol Infect. 1998;120(2):125-8.
15. Schmid D, Schandl S, Pichler AM, Kornschober C, Berghold C, Beranek A, et al. Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 21 outbreak in Austria, 2005. Euro Surveill. 2006;11(2):pii=600. Available from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=600
16. Arnold ME, Carrique-Mas JJ, Davies RH. Sensitivity of environmental sampling methods for detecting Salmonella Enteritidis in commercial laying flocks relative to the withinflock prevalence. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138(3):330-9.
17. Musgrove MT, Jones DR, Northcutt JK, Harrison MA, Cox NA, Ingram KD, et al. Recovery of Salmonella from commercial shell eggs by shell rinse and shell crush methodologies. Poult Sci. 2005;84(12):1955-8.
18. Gast RK, Guard-Bouldin J, Holt PS. The relationship between the duration of fecal shedding and the production of contaminated eggs by laying hens infected with strains of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella Heidelberg. Avian Dis. 2005;49(3):382-6.
19. Shivaprasad HL, Timoney JF, Morales S, Lucio B, Baker RC. Pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis infection in laying chickens. I. Studies on egg transmission, clinical signs, fecal shedding, and serologic responses. Avian Dis. 1990;34(3):548-57.
20. Fletcher DL. Influence of sampling methodology on reported incidence of Salmonella in poultry. J AOAC Int. 2006;89(2):512-6.
21. Carrique-Mas JJ, Davies RH. Salmonella Enteritidis in commercial layer flocks in Europe: Legislative background, on-farm sampling and main challenges. Braz J Poult Sci. 2008;10(1):1-9.
22. Arroyo G, Arroyo JA. Efficiency of different enrichment and isolation procedures for the detection of Salmonella serotypes in edible offal. J Appl Bacteriol. 1995;79(4):360-7.
23. Cox NA, Berrang ME. Inadequacy of selective plating media in field detection of Salmonella. J Appl Poult Res. 2000;9:403-6.
24. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Scientific Opinion on a quantitative estimation of the public health impact of setting a new target for the reduction of Salmonella in laying hens. EFSA Journal. 2010;8(4):1546. Available from: http://www.efsa. europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/1546.pdf
25. Davies R, Breslin M. Effects of vaccination and other preventive methods for Salmonella enteritidis on commercial laying chicken farms. Vet Rec. 2003;153(22):673-7.
26. Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Timbermont L, Boyen F, Bohez L, Haesebrouck F, et al. Oral immunisation of laying hens with the live vaccine strains of TAD Salmonella vac E and TAD Salmonella vac T reduces internal egg contamination with Salmonella Enteritidis. Vaccine. 2006;24(37-39):6250-5.
27. Inoue AY, Berchieri A Jr, Bernardino A, Paiva JB, Sterzo EV. Passive immunity of progeny from broiler breeders vaccinated with oil-emulsion bacterin against Salmonella enteritidis. Avian Dis. 2008;52(4):567-71.
28. Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Pasmans F, Bohez L, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, et al. Intermittent long-term shedding and induction of carrier birds after infection of chickens early posthatch with a low or high dose of Salmonella enteritidis. Poult Sci. 2004;83(11):1911-6.
29. European Commission (EC). Commission Decision of 22 September 2004 concerning a baseline study on the prevalence of salmonella in laying flocks of Gallus gallus. Official Journal of the European Union. 30 Sep 2004. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri= OJ:L:2004:303:0030:0034:EN:PDF