Recovery of Salmonella from commercial shell eggs by shell rinse and shell crush methodologies

Poultry Science

Volumn 84, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1955-1958

  Musgrove, M T ^a,b   Jones, D R ^a   Northcutt, J K ^a   Harrison, M A ^b   Cox, N A ^a   Ingram, K D ^a   Hinton Jr , A J ^a  

^a RUSSELL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Commercial shell egg; Crush; Methods; Rinse; Salmonella

Indexed keywords

SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; DISINFECTION; EGG; EGG SHELL; EVALUATION; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD HANDLING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DISINFECTION; EGG SHELL; EGGS; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD HANDLING; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33645745027     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.12.1955     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baker, R. C., and C. Bruce. 1995. Effects of processing on the microbiology of eggs. Pages 153-173 in Microbiology of the Avian Egg. R. G. Board and R. Fuller, ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
2. Berrang, M. E., N. A. Cox, J. S. Bailey, and L. C. Blankenship. 1991. Methods for inoculation and recovery of Salmonella from chicken eggs. Poult. Sci. 70:2267-2270.
3. Board, R. G. and H. S. Tranter. 1995. The microbiology of eggs. Pages 81-104 in Egg Science and Technology. 4th ed. W. J. Stadelman and O. J. Cotterill, ed. Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY.
4. 2 test. Biometrics 10:417-451.
5. Cox, N. A., and B. H. Davis. 1968. Survey of Louisiana egg plants. Report. Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.
6. Gentry, R. F., and C. L. Quarles. 1972. The measurement of bacterial contamination of egg shells. Poult. Sci. 51:930-933.
7. Gunaratne, J. W. B., and J. V. Spencer. 1973. A study of methods to enumerate the microbial flora of the avian egg shell. J. Milk Food Technol. 36:101-102.
8. Jones, F. T., D. V. Rives, and J. B. Carey. 1995. Salmonella contamination in commercial eggs and an egg production facility. Poult. Sci. 74:753-757.
9. March, B. E. 1969. Bacterial infection of washed and unwashed eggs with respect to salmonellae. Appl. Microbiol. 17:98-101.
10. Musgrove, M. T. 2004. Effects of processing on the microbiology of commercial shell eggs. Ph.D. Diss. Univ. Georgia, Athens.
11. Northcutt, J. K., M. T. Musgrove, and D. R. Jones. 2005. Chemical analyses of commercial shell egg wash water. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 14:289-295.
12. Penniston, V., and L. R. Hedrick. 1947. The reduction of bacterial count in egg pulp by use of germicides in washing dirty eggs. Food Technol. 1:240-244.
13. Ricke, S. C., S. G. Birkhold, and R. K. Gast. 2001. Eggs and egg products. Pages 473-479 in Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 4th ed. F. P. Downes and K. Ito, eds. Am. Public Health Assoc., Washington, DC.
14. Rizk, S., J. C. Ayres, and A. A. Kraft. 1966. Disinfection of eggs artificially inoculated with salmonella. I. Application of several disinfectants. Poult. Sci. 45:764-769.
15. Solowey, M., E. H. Spaulding, and H. E. Goresline. 1946. An investigation of a source and mode of entry of Salmonella organisms in spray-dried whole-egg powder. Food Res. 11:380-390.
16. Williams, J. E., and L. H. Dillard. 1973. The effect of external shell treatments on Salmonella penetration of chicken eggs. Poult. Sci. 52:1084-1089.