Integrated landsat image analysis and hydrologic modeling to detect impacts of 25-year land-cover change on surface runoff in a Philippine watershed

Remote Sensing

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1067-1087

  Santillan, Jojene ^a   Makinano, Meriam ^b   Paringit, Enrico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES   (Philippines)

^b Caraga State University   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Hydrology; Impact analysis; Land cover; Landsat; Modelling

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGIC MODELING; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; ILLEGAL LOGGING; IMPACT ANALYSIS; LAND COVER; LAND-COVER CHANGE; LANDSAT; LANDSAT ETM+; LANDSAT IMAGES; LOGGING INDUSTRY; MODEL RESULTS; MODELLING; MULTI-TEMPORAL; PHILIPPINES; RAINFALL EVENT; RECENT STATE; REHABILITATION STRATEGY; RUNOFF PREDICTION; RUNOFF RESPONSE; SLASH-AND-BURN AGRICULTURE; SURFACE RUNOFFS; WATERSHED RUNOFF;

DEFORESTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RUNOFF; WATERSHEDS;

LANDFORMS;

EID: 80052546012     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs3061067     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. McColl, C.; Aggett, G. Land-use forecasting and hydrologic model integration for improved land-use decision support. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 84, 494-512.
2. Cebecauer, T.; Hofierka, J. The consequences of land-cover changes on soil erosion distribution in Slovakia. Geomorphology 2008, 98, 187-198.
3. DENR. Taguibo River Watershed Management Plan; Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Butuan City, Agusan del Norte, Philippines, 2003.
4. Engman, E.T. Remote sensing applications to hydrology: Future impact. Hydrol. Sci. 1996, 41, 637-647.
5. Engman, E.T. The use of remote sensing data in watershed research. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1995, 50, 438.
6. Bach, H.; Braun, M.; Lampart, G.; Mauser, W. Use of remote sensing for hydrological parameterisation of Alpine catchments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2003, 7, 862-876.
7. Melesse, A.M.; Shih, S.F. Spatially distributed storm runoff depth estimation using Landsat images and GIS. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 37, 173-183.
8. Pandey, A.; Chowdary, V.M.; Mal, B.C.; Billib, M. Runoff and sediment yield modeling from a small agricultural watershed in India using the WEPP model. J. Hydrol. 2008, 348, 305-319.
9. Bhuyan, S.J.; Koelliker, J.K.; Marzen, L.J.; Harrington, J.A. An integrated approach for water quality assessment of a Kansas watershed. Environ. Model. Softw. 2003, 18, 473-484.
10. O'Connell, P.E.; Ewen, J.; O'Donnell, G.; Quinn, P. Is there a link between agricultural land-use management and flooding? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11, 96-107.
11. Vafeidis, A.T.; Drake, N.A.; Wainwright, J. A proposed method for modelling the hydrologic response of catchments to burning with the use of remote sensing and GIS. Catena 2007, 70, 396-409.
12. Helmschrot, J.; Flügel, W. Land use characterisation and change detection analysis for hydrological model parameterisation of large scale afforested areas using remote sensing. Phys. Chem. Earth 2002, 27, 711-718.
13. LeBlanc, M.J.; Favreau, G.; Massuel, S.; Tweed, S.O.; Loireau, M.; Cappelaere, B. Land clearance and hydrological change in the Sahel: SW Niger. Glob. Planetary Change 2008, 61, 135-150.
14. Niehoff, D.; Fritsch, U.; Bronstert, A. Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: Scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. J. Hydrol. 2002, 267, 80-93.
15. SCS. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology; US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1985.
16. Coppin, P.; Jonckheere, I.; Nackaerts, K.; Muys, B. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 1565-1596.
17. Jensen, J.R. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2004.
18. Cherill, A.J.; Lane, A.; Fuller, R.M. The use of classified Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper imagery in the characterization of landscape composition: A case study in Northern England. J. Environ. Manage. 1994, 40, 357-377.
19. Cingolani, A.M.; Renison, D.; Zak, M.R.; Cabido, M.R. Mapping vegetation in a heterogeneous mountain rangeland using Landsat data: An alternative method to define and classify land-cover units. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 92, 84-97.
20. Hagner, O.; Reese, H. A method for calibrated maximum likelihood classification of forest types. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 110, 438-444.
21. Swain, P.H.; Davis, S.M. Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1978.
22. Muttitanon, W.; Tripathi, N.K. Land use/land cover changes in the coastal zone of Ban Don Bay, Thailand using Landsat 5 TM data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26, 2311-2323.
23. Chowdhury, R. Landscape change in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: Modeling the driving forces of smallholder deforestation in land parcels. Appl. Geogr. 2006, 26, 129-152.
24. Vagen, T.G. Remote sensing of complex land use change trajectories-A case study from the highlands of Madagascar. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 115, 219-228.
25. Huang, C.; Davis, L.S.; Townshend, J.R.G. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2002, 23, 725-749.
26. Shuying, J.; Deren, L.; Jingwen, W. A Comparison of Support Vector Machine with Maximum Likelihood Classification Algorithms on Texture Features. In Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Soeul, Korea, 25-29 July 2005; Volume 5, pp. 3717-3720.
27. Otukei, J.R.; Blaschke, T. Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2010, 12, S27-S31.
28. Foody, G.M.; Mathur, A. Relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by Support Vector Machines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2002, 42, 1335-1343.
29. Markham, B.L.; Barker, J.L. Landsat MSS and TM Post-Calibration Dynamic Ranges, Exoatmospheric Reflectances and at-Satellite Temperatures; EOSAT Landsat Technical Notes No. 1; EOSAT: Lanham, MD, USA, 1986.
30. NASA. Landsat-7 Science Data User's Handbook; Available online: http://landsathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/handbook.html (accessed on 15 April 2008).
31. Schowengerdt, R.A. Remote Sensing: Models and Methods for Image Processing; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1997.
32. Anderson, J.R.; Hardy, E.E.; Roach, J.T.; Witmer, R.E. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with remote Sensor Data; USGS Professional Paper 964; US GPO: Washington, DC, USA, 1976.
33. Mather, P.M. Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images; 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
34. Richards, J.A.; Jia, X. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999.
35. Van Genderen, J.L.; Lock, B.F.; Vass, P.A. Remote sensing: statistical testing of thematic map accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ. 1978, 7, 3-14.
36. Congalton, R.G.; Green, K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices; Lewis Publishers: Boca Rotan, FL, USA, 1999.
37. Ponce, V.M.; Hawkins, R.H. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? J. Hydrol. Eng. 1996, 1, 11-19.
38. Chow, V.T.; Maidment, D.R.; Mays, L.W. Applied Hydrology; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1988.
39. USACE. Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS Technical Reference Manual; US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center: Davis, CA, USA, 2000.
40. USACE. Geospatial Hydrologic Modelling Extension HEC-GeoHMS User's Manual, Version 1.1; US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center: Davis, CA, USA, 2003.
41. Nelder, J.A.; Mead, R. A simplex method for function minimization. The Comput. J. 1965, 7, 308-313.
42. Nash, J.E.; Sutcliffe, J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, I-A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10, 282-290.
43. Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Van Liew, M.W.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50, 885-900.
44. Van den Top, G.M. The Social Dynamics of Deforestation in the Sierra Madre, Philippines; NIASS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.
45. Verburg, P.H.; Veldkamp, A. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecol. 2004, 19, 77-98.
46. Mishra, S.K.; Sahu, R.K.; Eldho, T.I.; Jain, M.K. An improved Ia-S relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resour. Manage. 2006, 20, 643-660.
47. Costa, M.H.; Botta, A.; Cardille, J.A. Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantins River, Southeastern Amazonia. J. Hydrol. 2003, 283, 206-217.
48. Siriwardena, L.; Finlayson, B.L.; McMahon, T.A. The impact of land use change on catchment hydrology in large catchments: The Comet River, Central Queensland, Australia. J. Hydrol. 2006, 326, 199-214.