The poverty deconcentration imperative and public housing transformation

Sociology Compass

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 824-833

  Oakley, Deirdre ^a   Ward, Chandra ^a   Reid, Lesley ^a   Ruel, Erin ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052545604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17519020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00405.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bauman, J. 1974. 'Black Slums/Black Projects: The New Deal and Negro Housing in Philadelphia. Pennsylvania History 41: 311-38.
2. Beaty, A. 2007. Atlanta's Olympic Legacy: Background Paper. Geneva, Switzerland: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions.
3. Bickford, A. and D. Massey. 1991. 'Segregation in the Second Ghetto: Racial and Ethnic Segregation in American Public Housing. Social Forces 69(4): 1011-36.
4. Boston, T. 2005. 'The Effects of Revitalization on Public Housing Residents: A Case Study of the Atlanta Housing Authority. Journal of the American Planning Association 71(4): 393-406.
5. Brenner, N. and S. Elden (eds) 2009. State, Space, World: Selected Essays, Henri Lefebvre. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
6. Buron, L., D. Levy and M. Gallagher. 2007. Housing Choice Vouchers: How HOPE VI Families Fared in the Private Market. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Housing and Communities Center, Urban Institute.
7. Castells, N. 2010. 'HOPE VI Neighborhood Spillover Effects in Baltimore. Cityscape 12(1): 65-98.
8. Clampet-Lundquist, S. 2004. 'HOPE VI Relocations: Moving to new Neighborhoods and Building new Ties. Housing Policy Debate 15(2): 415-47.
9. Crump, J. 2002. 'Deconcentration by Demolition: Public Housing, Poverty, and Urban Policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20: 581-96.
10. Currie, J. and A. Yelowitz. 1998. Public Housing and Labor Supply (Research Working Papers, Series 8). Chicago, IL: Joint Center on Poverty.
11. DeFilippis, J. and J. Fraser. 2010. 'Why do we Want Mixed Income Housing and Neighborhoods?' Pp. 205-24 in Critical Urban Studies: New Directions, edited by J. Davies and B. Imbroscio. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. Devine, D., R. Gray, L. Rubin and L. Taghavi. 2003. Housing Choice Voucher Location Patterns: Implications for Participants and Neighborhood Welfare. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
13. Donovan, S. 2010, May 25. Written Testimony of Shaun Donovan, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Transformation Rental Assistance Hearing. Washington, DC: U.S. House Financial Services Committee.
14. Fischer, P. 2001. Section 8 and the Public Housing Revolution: Where Will the Families Go? Chicago: Woods Fund of Chicago.
15. Fischer, P. 2002. Racial Concentration and the CHA Relocation Program. Chicago: Shriver National Poverty Law Center of Chicago.
16. Fraser, J. and M. Nelson. 2008. 'Can Mixed-Income Housing Ameliorate Concentrated Poverty? The Significance of a Geographically Informed Sense of Community. Geographic Compass 2(6): 2127-44.
17. Freeman, L. 2004. Siting Affordable Housing: Location and Neighborhood Trends of Low Income Housing Tax Credit Developments in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Census 2000 Survey Series.
18. Galster, G. 2005. 'Consequences From the Redistribution of Urban Poverty During the 1990s: A Cautionary Tale. Economic Development Quarterly 19(2): 119-25.
19. Goering, J., A. Kamely and T. Richardson. 1997. 'Recent Research on Racial Segregation and Poverty Concentration in Public Housing in the United States. Urban Affairs Review 32(5): 723-45.
20. Goering, J. and M. Coulibably. 1989. 'Investigating Public Housing Segregation: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Urban Affairs Quarterly 25: 265-97.
21. Goetz, E. 2000. 'The Politics of Poverty Deconcentration and Housing Demolition. Journal of Urban Affairs 22(2): 157-73.
22. Goetz, E. 2002. 'Forced Relocations vs. Voluntary Mobility: The Effects of Dispersal Programmes on Households. Housing Studies 17(1): 107-23.
23. Goetz, E. 2003. Clearing the Way. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
24. Goetz, E. 2005. 'Comment: Public Housing Demolition and the Benefits to low-Income Families. Journal of the American Planning Association 71(4): 407-9.
25. Goetz, E. 2009. Testimony to the United States Housing of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, Hearing on Academic Perspectives on the Future of Public Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. House Financial Services Committee.
26. Goetz, E. 2010. 'Better Neighborhoods, Better Outcomes? Explaining Relocation Outcomes in HOPE VI. Cityscape 12(1): 5-32.
27. Gray, R. and S. Tursky. 1986. 'Location and Racial/Ethnic Occupancy Patterns for HUD-Subsidized Family Housing in ten Metropolitan Areas.' Pp. 235-52 in Housing Desegregation and Federal Policy, edited by J. Goering. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28. Hartman, C. 1975. Housing and Social Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Hartung, J. and J. Henig. 1997. 'Housing Vouchers and Certificates as a Vehicle for Deconcentrating the Poor: Evidence From the Washington DC Metropolitan Areas. Urban Affairs Review 32(3): 403-19.
30. Hirsch, A. 1983. Making the Second Ghetto: Race and Housing in Chicago, 1940-1960. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31. Husock, H. 2010. Reinventing Public Housing: Is the Atlanta Model Right for Your City? New York: The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
32. Jargowsky, P. A. 1997. Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
33. Joseph, M. 2006. 'Is Mixed-Income Development an Antidote to Urban Poverty? Housing Policy Debate 17(2): 209-34.
34. Keating, L. 2000a. Atlanta: Race, Class, and Urban Expansion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
35. Keating, L. 2000b. 'Redeveloping Public Housing: Relearning Urban Renewal's Immutable Lessons. Journal of the American Planning Association 66(4): 384-97.
36. Keating, L. and Flores, C. 2000. 'Sixty and out: Techwood Homes Transformed by Enemies and Friends. Journal of Urban History 26(3): 275-311.
37. Kingsley, T., J. Johnson and K. Pettit. 2003. 'Patterns of Section 8 Relocation in the HOPE VI Program. Journal of Urban Affairs 25(4): 427-47.
38. Kleit, R. and L. Manzo. 2006. 'To Move or not to Move: Relationships to Place and Relocation Choices in HOPE VI. Housing Policy Debate 17(2): 271-308.
39. Kling, J., J. Liebman, L. Katz and L. Sanbonmatsu. 2004. Moving to Opportunity and Tranquility: Neighborhood Effects on Adult Economic Self-Sufficiency and Health From a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment. Cambridge, MA: NBER and Harvard University.
40. Massey, D. and N. Denton. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Massey, D. and S. Kanaiaupuni. 1993. 'Public Housing and the Concentration of Poverty. Social Science Quarterly 74(1): 109-22.
42. Meyerson, M. and E. Banfield. 1955. Politics, Planning and the Public Interest. New York: Free Press.
43. National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing. 1992. The Final Report of the National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing: A Report to the Congress and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: Author.
44. National Housing Law Project. 2002. False HOPE: A Critical Assessment of the HOPE VI Public Housing Redevelopment Program. Washington, DC: Author.
45. Newman, H. 2002. The Atlanta Housing Authority's Olympic Legacy Program: Public Housing Projects to Mixed Income Communities. Atlanta: Research Atlanta Inc.
46. Newman, S. and A. Schnare. 1997. ''... And a Suitable Living Environment': The Failure of Housing Programs to Deliver on Neighborhood Quality. Housing Policy Debate 8(4): 703-41.
47. Oakley, D., E. Ruel and E. Wilson. 2008. A Choice With No Options: Atlanta Public Housing Residents' Lived Experiences in the Face of Relocation. Atlanta: Georgia State University.
48. Oakley, D., E. Ruel and L. Reid. 2010. It's a Trade Off: The Objective and Subjective Realities of Public Housing Relocation in Atlanta. Conference on Neighbourhood Restructuring and Resident Relocation: Context, Choice and Consequences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. 4-5 November 2010. [Online]. Retrieved on 4 June 2011 from:.
49. Oakley, D. and K. Burchfield. 2009. 'Out of the Projects, Still in the Hood: The Spatial Constraints on Public Housing Residents' Relocation in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs 31(5): 589-614.
50. Pendall, R. 2000. 'Why Voucher and Certificate Users Live in Distressed Neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate 11(4): 881-910.
51. Popkin, S. 2010. 'A Glass Half Empty? New Evidence From the HOPE VI Panel Study. Housing Policy Debate 20(1): 43-63.
52. Popkin, S., B. Katz, M. Cunningham, K. Brown, J. Gustarfson and M. Turner. 2004a. A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute and Brookings Institution.
53. Popkin, S., D. Levy, L. Harris, J. Comey and M. Cunningham. 2004b. 'The HOPE VI Program: What About the Residents? Housing Policy Debate 15(2): 385-414.
54. Reingold, D., G. Van Ryzin and M. Ronda. 2001. 'Does Urban Public Housing Diminish the Social Capital and Labor Force Activity of its Tenants? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20(3): 485-504.
55. Robinson, W. S. 1950. 'Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review 15(3): 351-7.
56. Rossi, P. and R. Dentler. 1961. The Politics of Urban Renewal: The Chicago Findings. New York: Free Press.
57. Salama, J. 1999. 'The Redevelopment of Distressed Public Housing: Early Results From HOPE VI Projects in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio. Housing Policy Debate 10(1): 95-142.
58. Schwartz, A and K Tajbakhsh. 1997. 'Mixed-Income Housing: Unanswered Questions. Cityscape 3(2): 71-92.
59. Shalhoup, M. 2007. 'Public Housing on the Chopping Block. Creative Loafing, Atlanta, GA, 19 September.
60. Slater, C. M. and G. E. Hall. 1994. 1994 County and City Extra: Annual Metro, City, and County Data Book. Lanham, MD: Bernan Press.
61. Smith, R. 2002. Housing Choice for HOPE VI Relocatees. Washington DC: Urban Institute.
62. Soja, E. 2000. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
63. Stone, M. 1993. Shelter Poverty: New Ideas on Housing Affordability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
64. Strait, J. 2006. 'Poverty Concentration in the Presmatic Metropolis: The Impact of Compositional and Redistribute Forces Within Los Angeles, California, 1990-2000. Journal of Urban Affairs 28(1): 71-94.
65. Turbov, M. and V. Piper. 2005. HOPE VI and Mixed-Finance Redevelopments: A Catalyst for Neighborhood Renewal. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program.
66. Vale, L. 2006. 'Comment on Mark L. Joseph's 'Is Mixed-Income Development an Antidote to Urban Poverty? Housing Policy Debate 17(2): 259-69.
67. Varady, D. and C. Walker. 2000. 'Vouchering out Distressed Subsidized Developments: Does Moving Lead to Improvements in Housing and Neighborhood Conditions? Housing Policy Debate 11(1): 115-59.
68. Venkatesh, S. 2000. American Project: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Venkatesh, S. 2008. Gang Leader for a Day. New York: The Penguin Press.
70. Venkatesh, S. and I. Celimli. 2004. 'Tearing Down the Community. Shelter Force 138: 1-9.
71. Wang, X. and D. Varady. 2005. 'Using Hot-Spot Analysis to Study the Clustering of Section 8 Housing Voucher Families. Housing Studies 20(1): 29-48.
72. Wang, X., D. Varady and Y. Wang. 2008. 'Measuring the Deconcentration of Housing Choice Voucher Program Recipients in Eight U.S. Metropolitan Areas Using hot Spot Analysis. Cityscape 10(1): 65-90.
73. White, R. 1997. 'Reinventing Public Housing: The Atlanta Experience. Journal of Housing and Community Development 4(July/August): 1-5.
74. Wilson, W. J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75. Wyly, E. and J. DeFilippis. 2010. 'Mapping Public Housing: The Case of New York City. City & Community 9(1): 61-86.