Comment: Public housing demolition and the benefits to low-income families

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 407-410

  Goetz, Edward G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOW INCOME HOUSING; SOCIAL HOUSING;

EID: 29144449950     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360508976711     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bagart, B., Jr. 2002. HOPE VI and St. Thomas:Smoke, mirrors and urban mercantilism, London:London School of Economics.
2. Bennett, L., and Reed, A., Jr. 1999. “ The new face of urban renewal:The Near North Redevelopment Initiative and the Cabrini-Green neighborhood ”. In Without justice for all:The new liberalism and our retreat from racial equality, Edited by:Reed, A., Jr. 175–211. Boulder, CO:West-view Press.
3. Buron, L., September 2004. An improved living environment? Relocation outcomes for HOPE VI relocatees, September, Washington, DC:Urban Institute. (Brief No. 3)
4. Clampet-Lundquist, S., 2004. Moving over or moving up? Short-term gains and losses for relocated HOPE VI families. Cityscape, 7 (1):57–80.
5. Comey, J., September 2004. An improved living environment? Relocation outcomes for HOPE VI relocatees, September, Washington, DC:Urban Institute. (Brief No. 2)
6. Cunningham, M. K., 2004. An improved living environment? Relocation outcomes for HOPE VI relocatees, Washington, DC:Urban Institute. (Brief No. 1)
7. Duncan, G. J., Clark-Kauffman, E., and Snell, E., 2004. Residential mobility interventions as treatments for the sequalae of neighborhood violence, Evanston, IL:Northwestern University. http://www.wws.princeton.edu/kling/mto/violence.pdfAvailable on-line at
8. Goetz, E. G., 2002. Forced relocation vs. voluntary mobility:The effects of dispersal programmes on households. Housing Studies, 77 (1):107–123.
9. Goetz, E. G., 2003. Clearing the way:Deconcentrating the poor in urban America, Washington, DC:Urban Institute Press.
10. Keating, L., 2000. Redeveloping public housing:Relearning urban renewal's immutable lessons. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66:384–397.
11. 9io, New York:Universe Books.
12. Kingsley, G. T., Abravanel, M. D., Cunningham, M., Gustafson, J., Naparstek, A. J., and Turner, M. A., 2003. Lessons from HOPE VI for the future of public housing, Washington, DC:Urban Institute.
13. Kling, J. R, and Liebman, J. B., March 2004. Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects on youth March, http://www.wws.princeton.edu/kling/mto/483.pdf(Princeton University Industrial Relations Section Working Paper 483). Available at
14. Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., Katz, L. F., and Sanbonmatsu, L., April 2004. Moving To Opportunity and tranquility:Neighborhood effects on adult economic self sufficiency and health from a randomized housing voucher experiment April, http://www.wws.princeton.edu/kling/mto/483.pdf(Princeton University Industrial Relations Section Working Paper 481). Available on-line at
15. Newman, H., 2002. The Atlanta Housing Authority's Olympic legacy program:Public housing projects to mixed-income communities, Atlanta:Research Atlanta, Inc. http://raweb2003.brinkster.net/FullReports/02_PublicHousingConver-sion.pdfAvailable on-line at
16. Orr, L., Feins, J. D., Jacob, R., Beecroft, E., Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. F., Liebman, J. B., and Kling, J. R., 2003. Moving To Opportunity:Interim impacts evaluation, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
17. Patterson, R., Wood, M., Lam, K., Patrabansh, S., Mills, G., Sullivan, S., Amare, H., and Zandniapour, L., 2004. Evaluation of the Welfare to Work Voucher Program:Report to Congress, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
18. Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M. K., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., and Turner, M. A., 2004. A decade of HOPE VI:Research findings and policy challenges, Washington, DC:Urban Institute & The Brookings Institution.