Single-cell electroporation in Xenopus

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1056-1061

  Liu, Xue Feng ^a   Haas, Kurt ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT DYE; PLASMID DNA; PHOTOPROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROPORATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; MICROPIPETTE; MULTIPHOTON MICROSCOPY; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; SINGE CELL ELECTROPORATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; XENOPUS; ANIMAL; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PLASMID; STAINING; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; ELECTROPORATION; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; NEURONS; PLASMIDS; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; STAINING AND LABELING; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 80052511400     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15596095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top065607     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Dunfield D, Haas K. 2009. Single-cell electroporation. In Encyclopedia of neuroscience (ed. Squire LR), pp. 833-839. Academic, New York.
2. Ewald RC, Van Keuren-Jensen KR, Aizenman CD, Cline HT. 2008. Roles of NR2A and NR2B in the development of dendritic arbor morphology in vivo. J Neurosci 28: 850-861.
3. Haas K, Sin WC, Javaherian A, Li Z, Cline HT. 2001. Single-cell electroporation for gene transfer in vivo. Neuron 29: 583-591.
4. Haas K, Jensen K, Sin WC, Foa L, Cline HT. 2002. Targeted electroporation in Xenopus tadpoles in vivo-From single cells to the entire brain. Differentiation 70: 148-154.
5. Haas K, Li J, Cline HT. 2006. AMPA receptors regulate experiencedependent dendritic arbor growth in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 12127-12131.
6. Hewapathirane DS, Haas K. 2008. Single cell electroporation in vivo within the intact developing brain. J Vis Exp 17: 705. doi: 10-3791/705.
7. Ho SY, Mittal GS. 1996. Electroporation of cell membranes: A review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 16: 349-362.
8. Inoue T, Krumlauf R. 2001. An impulse to the brain-Using in vivo electroporation. Nat Neurosci 4: 1156-1158.
9. Joshi RP, Schoenbach KH. 2000. Electroporation dynamics in biological cells subjected to ultrafast electrical pulses: A numerical simulation study. Phys Rev E 62: 1025-1033.
10. Judkewitz B, Rizzi M, Kitamura K, Hausser M. 2009. Targeted single-cell electroporation of mammalian neurons in vivo. Nat Protoc 4: 862-869.
11. Liu XF, Haas K. 2009. PKMz restricts dendritic arbor growth by filopodial and branch stabilization within the intact and awake developing brain. J Neurosci 29: 12229-12235.
12. Liu XF, Haas K. 2011. Single-cell electroporation of Xenopus tadpole tectal neurons. Cold Spring Harb Protoc doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot065615.
13. Lovell P, Jezzini SH, Moroz LL. 2006. Electroporation of neurons and growth cones in Aplysia californica. J Neurosci Methods 151: 114-120.
14. Miyasaka N, Arimatsu Y, Takiguchihayashi K. 1999. Foreign gene expression in an organotypic culture of cortical anlage after in vivo electroporation. Neuroreport 10: 2319-2323.
15. Muramatsu T, Mizutani Y, Ohmori Y, Okumura J. 1997. Comparison of three nonviral transfection methods for foreign gene expression in early chicken embryos in ovo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 230: 376-380.
16. Neumann E, Kakorin S, Toensing K. 1999. Fundamentals of electroporative delivery of drugs and genes. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 48: 3-16.
17. Olofsson J, Nolkrantz K, Ryttsen F, Lambie BA, Weber SG, Orwar O. 2003. Single-cell electroporation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14: 29-34.
18. Potter H. 2003. Transfection by electroporation. Curr Protoc Mol Biol doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1015s03.
19. Rae JL, Levis RA. 2002. Single-cell electroporation. Pflugers Arch 443: 664-670.
20. Rathenberg J, Nevian T, Witzemann V. 2003. High-efficiency transfection of individual neurons using modified electrophysiology techniques. J Neurosci Methods 126: 91-98.
21. Sin WC, Haas K, Ruthazer ES, Cline HT. 2002. Dendrite growth increased by visual activity requires NMDA receptor and Rho GTPases. Nature 419: 475-480.
22. Smith KC, Neu JC, Krassowska W. 2004. Model of creation and evolution of stable electropores for DNA delivery. Biophys J 86: 2813-2826.
23. Sorensen SA, Rubel EW. 2006. The level and integrity of synaptic input regulates dendrite structure. J Neurosci 26: 1539-1550.
24. Sukharev SI, Klenchin VA, Serov SM, Chernomordik LV, Chizmadzhev YuA. 1992. Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores. Biophys J 63: 1320-1327.
25. Swartz M, Eberhart J, Mastick GS, Krull CE. 2001. Sparking new frontiers: Using in vivo electroporation for genetic manipulations. Dev Biol 233: 13-21.
26. Tsong TY. 1991. Electroporation of cell membranes. Biophys J 60: 297-306.
27. Uesaka N, Hirai S, Maruyama T, Ruthazer ES, Yamamoto N. 2005. Activity dependence of cortical axon branch formation: A morphological and electrophysiological study using organotypic slice cultures. J Neurosci 25: 1-9.
28. Umeda T, Ebihara T, Okabe S. 2005. Simultaneous observation of stably associated presynaptic varicosities and postsynaptic spines: Morphological alterations of CA3-CA1 synapses in hippocampal slice cultures. Mol Cell Neurosci 28: 264-274.
29. Van Keuren-Jensen K, Cline HT. 2006. Visual experience regulates metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated plasticity of AMPA receptor synaptic transmission by Homer1a induction. J Neurosci 26: 7575-7580.
30. Washbourne P, McAllister AK. 2002. Techniques for gene transfer into neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12: 566-573.