Development of a modified neural network-based land cover classification system using automated data selector and multiresolution remotely sensed data

Geocarto International

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 435-457

  Khorram, Siamak ^a,b   Yuan, Hui ^c   van der Wiele, Cynthia F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ERDAS Inc   (China)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network (ANN); landsat TM; Automated data selector (ADS); Data fusion; Image classification; Land use land cover classification; Multiresolution classification; Remote sensing; SPOT

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUTOMATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPOT;

EID: 80052424074     PISSN: 10106049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2011.600462     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andina, D. and Duc Truong, P., 2007. Computational intelligence for engineering and manufacturing. 1st ed. NY: Springer-Verlag.
2. Barron-Adame, J.M., Cortina-Januchs, M.G., and Vega-Corona, A., 2009. Data fusion and neural network combination method for air pollution level monitoring. 7th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, 24-26 June 2009 Cardiff, UK: Industrial Informatics, 23-26,522-527.
3. Benediktsson, J.A., Swain, P.H., and Ersoy, O.K., 1990. Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multi-source remote sensing data. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28, 540-551.
4. Bezdek, J.C., Tsao, E.C.-K., and Pal, N.R., 1992. Fuzzy Kohonen clustering networks. In:IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 8-12 Mar 1992, San Diego, CA, 1035-1043.
5. Bischof, H., Schneider, W., and Pinz, A.J., 2002. Multispectral classification of Landsat images using neural networks. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30 (3), 482-490.
6. Bruzzone, L., et al., 1997. Multisource classification of complex rural areas by statistical and neural network approaches. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, 523-533.
7. Burini, A., et al., 2008. TerraSAR-X/SPOT-5 fused images for supervised land cover classification. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2008, 7-11 July 2008. Vol. 5. Boston, MA: IEEE International, 373-376.
8. Cakir, H.I. and Khorram, S., 2008. Correspondence analysis fusion. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 74 (2), 183-192.
9. Cakir, H.I., Khorram, S., and Nelson, S.A.C., 2006. Correspondence analysis approach for detecting land use land cover changes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102 (3-4), 306-317.
10. Dai, X.L. and Khorram, S., 1998. The effects of image mis-registration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36 (5), 1566-1577.
11. Dai, X.L. and Khorram, S., 1999. Data fusion using artificial neural networks: a case study on multitemporal change analysis. Computers, Environments, and Urban Systems, 23, 19-31.
12. ERDAS, 2007. ERDAS field guide. Atlanta, GA: ERDAS, Inc.
13. Foody, G.M., McCulloch, M.B., and Yates, W.B., 1995. The effect of training set size and composition on artificial neural network classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, 1707-1723.
14. Goncalves, M.L., de Andrade Netto, M.L., and Zullo, J., 1998. A neural architecture for the classification of remote sensing imagery with advanced learning algorithms. Neural Networks for Signal Processing VIII, 1998. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Signal Processing Society Workshop, 31 August-2 September 1998, Cambridge, UK, 577-586.
15. Goncalves, M.L., et al., 2008. An unsupervised method of classifying remotely sensed images using Kohonen self-organizing maps and agglomerative hierarchical clustering methods.International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29 (11), 3171-3207.
16. Hegarat-Mascle, S.L., 1997. Application of Dempster-Shafter evidence theory to unsupervised classification in multisource remote sensing. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35 (4), 1018-1031.
17. Hester, D.B., et al., 2008. Per-pixel classification of high spatial resolution satellite imagery for urban land cover mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 74 (4),463-471.
18. Khorram, S., et al., In press. Digital image acquisition, preprocessing, and data reduction. In:Pelton, Joseph N., Madry, Scott, Camacho-Lara, Sergio, eds. Handbook of Satellite Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Klausner, A., Tengg, A., and Rinner, B., 2008. Distributed multilevel data fusion for networked embedded systems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2 (4),538-555.
20. Kohonen, T., 1990. The self organization map (SOM). Proceedings of the IEEE, 78 (9), 1464-1480.
21. Llinas, J. and Hall, D.L., 1998. An introduction to multi-sensor data fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE. International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 6, 537-540.
22. Lo, C.P. and Choi, J., 2004. A hybrid approach to urban land use/cover mapping using Landsat 7 enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM{thorn}) images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 2687-2700.
23. Lu, D., Batistella, M., and Moran, E., 2007. Land cover classification in the Brazilian Amazon with the integration of Landsat ETM{thorn} and Radarsat data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28 (24), 5447-5459.
24. Nogami, Y., 1997. Remote sensing data analysis by Kohonen feature map and competitive learning. In: IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 1997), Orlando, FL: IEEE, 1,524-529.
25. Paola, J.D. and Schowengerdt, R.A., 1997. The effect of neural-network structure on a multispectral land-use/land-cover classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, 535-544.
26. Park, N., et al., 2002. Multi-sensor data fusion for supervised land-cover classification using Bayesian and geostatistical techniques. Geosciences Journal, 6 (3), 193-202.
27. Principe, J.C., Euliano, N.R., and Lefebvre, W.C., 1999. Neural and adaptive systems:fundamentals through simulations. NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
28. Serpico, S.B. and Roli, F., 1995. Classification of multisensor remote-sensing images by structured neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33 (3),562-578.
29. Sun, W.X., et al., 2003. Information fusion for rural land-use classification with highresolution satellite imagery. GeoRS, 41 (4), 883-890.
30. Valdes, M.C. and Inamura, M., 2000. Spatial resolution improvement of remotely sensed images by a fully interconnected neural network approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38 (5), 2426-2430.
31. Varshney, P.K., 1997. Multisensor data fusion. Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal, 9 (6), 245-225.
32. Venkateshwarlu, Ch, Gopal Rao, K., and Prakash, A., 2003. Artificial neural networks in the improvement of spatial resolution of thermal infrared data for improved land use classification. 2nd GRSSfiSPRS Joint Workshop on Data Fusion and Remote Sensing over Urban Areas, 22-23 May 2003, Berlin, Germany, 162-166.
33. Wan, W.J. and Fraser, D., 1999. Multisource data fusion with multiple self-organizing maps.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, 1344-1349.
34. Yoshida, T. and Omatu, S., 1994. Neural network approach to land cover mapping. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, 1103-1109.
35. Yuan, H., 2002. Development and evaluation of advanced classification systems using remotely sensed data for accurate land-use/land-cover mapping. Dissertation (PhD). Raleigh, NC:North Carolina State University.
36. Zhang, J., Wang, K., and Yue, Q., 2006. Data fusion algorithm based on functional link artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress on intelligent control and automation, 1, 2806-2810.
37. Zhou, W.Y., 1999. Verification of the nonparametric characteristics of backpropagation neural networks for image classification. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, 771-779.
38. Zhuang, X., et al., 1991. Improving classification of crop residues using digital land ownership data and Landsat TM imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57 (11), 1487-1492.