Per-pixel classification of high spatial resolution satellite imagery for urban land-cover mapping

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 463-471

  Hester, David Barry ^a   Cakir, Halil I ^a   Nelson, Stacy A C ^a   Khorram, Siamak ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; LAND USE; PIXELS; VEGETATION;

EDGE PIXELS; PER-PIXEL CLASSIFICATION; QUICKBIRD IMAGERY; SATELLITE DATA;

SATELLITE IMAGERY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; BARE SOIL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ERROR ANALYSIS; GIS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; PIXEL; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SUBURBAN AREA; URBAN AREA; VEGETATION COVER;

NEUSE RIVER; NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; RALEIGH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 41549154690     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.74.4.463     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Al-Khudhairy, D.H.A., I. Caravaggi, and S. Glada, 2005. Structural damage assessments from Ikonos data using change detection, object-oriented segmentation, and classification techniques, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(8):825-837.
2. Alvarez-Mozos, J., J. Casali, M. Gonzalez-Audicana, and N.E.C. Verhoest, 2005. Correlation between ground measured soil moisture and RADARSAT-1 derived backscattering coefficient over an agricultural catchment of Navarre (North of Spain), Biosystems Engineering, 92:119-133.
3. Barr, S., and M. Barnsley, 2000. Reducing structural clutter in land cover classifications of high spatial resolution remotely-sensed images for urban land use mapping, Computers and Geosciences, 26:433-449.
4. Burkholder, J.M., E.J. Noga, C.H. Hobbs, and H.B. Glasgow, 1992. New phantom dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills, Nature, 358:407-410.
5. Butcher, J.B., 1999. Forecasting future land use for watershed assessment, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35:555-565.
6. Cablk, M.E., and T.B. Minor, 2003. Detecting and discriminating impervious cover with high-resolution Ikonos data using principal component analysis and morphological operators, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24:4627-4645.
7. Cakir, H.I., and S. Khorram, 2004. Methods, Systems and Computer Program Products for Fusion of High Spatial Resolution Imagery with Low-spatial but High-spectral Resolution Imagery Using Correspondence Analysis, November 04, U.S. Patent Application No: 10/982,054.
8. Carleer, A.P., O. Debeir, and E. Wolff, 2005. Assessment of very high spatial resolution satellite image segmentations, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(11):1285-1294.
9. Cheng, H.D., X.H. Jiang, Y. Sun, and J.L. Wang, 2001. Color image segmentation: Advances and prospects, Pattern Recognition, 34:2259-2281.
10. Chubey, M.S., S.E. Franklin, and M.A. Wulder, 2006. Object-based analysis of Ikonos-2 imagery for extraction of forest inventory parameters, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(3):383-394.
11. Clark, D.B., C.S. Castro, L.D.A. Alvarado, and J.M. Read, 2004. Quantifying mortality of tropical rain forest trees using high-spatial- resolution satellite data, Ecology Letters, 7:52-59.
12. Congalton, R.G., K. Birch, R. Jones, and J. Schriever, 2002. Evaluating remotely sensed techniques for mapping riparian vegetation, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37:113-126.
13. Congalton, R.G., and K. Green, 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, 137 p.
14. Dare, P.M., 2005. Shadow analysis in high-resolution satellite imagery of urban areas, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(1):169-177.
15. Faucette, L.B., C.F. Jordan, L.M. Risse, M. Cabrera, D.C. Coleman, and L.T. West, 2005. Evaluation of stormwater from compost and conventional erosion control practices in construction activities, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 60:288-297.
16. Fisher, J., and S. Goetz, 2001. Considerations in the use of high spatial resolution imagery: An applications research assessment, Proceedings of the ASPRS 2001 Annual Convention, 23-27 April, St. Louis, Missouri, unpaginated CD-ROM.
17. Foody, G.M., 1995. Land-cover classification by an artificial neural-network with ancillary information, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9:527-542.
18. Foody, G.M., 1997. Fully fuzzy supervised classification of land cover from remotely sensed imagery with an artificial neural network, Neural Computing and Applications, 5:238-247.
19. Foody, G.M., 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 80:185-201.
20. Gao, J., H.F. Chen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zha, 2004. Knowledge-based approaches to accurate mapping of mangroves from satellite data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(12):1241-1248.
21. Gillies, R.R., J.B. Box, J. Symanzik, and E.J. Rodemaker, 2003. Effects of urbanization on the aquatic fauna of the Line Creek watershed, Atlanta - A satellite perspective, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86:411-422.
22. Goetz, S., R. Wright, A. Smith, E. Zinecker, and E. Schaub, 2003. Ikonos imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region, Remote Sensing of Environment, 88:195-208.
23. Hayes, S.A., R.A. McLaughlin, and D.L. Osmond, 2005. Polyacrylamide use for erosion and turbidity control on construction sites, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 60:193-199.
24. Herold, M., M.E. Gardner, and D.A. Roberts, 2003. Spectral resolution requirements for mapping urban areas, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41:1907-1919.
25. Herold, M., X.H. Liu, and K.C. Clarke, 2003. Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land-use, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(9):991-1001.
26. Hu, X.Y., C.V. Tao, and B. Prenzel, 2005. Automatic segmentation of high-resolution satellite imagery by integrating texture, intensity, and color features, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(12):1399-1406.
27. Jennings, D., S. Jarnagin, and D. Ebert, 2004. A modeling approach for estimating watershed impervious surface area from national land-cover data 92, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(11):1295-1307.
28. Jensen, J., 2005. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Second edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
29. Jensen, J.R., and D.C. Cowen, 1999. Remote sensing of urban suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(6):611-622.
30. Kelly, M., D. Shaari, Q.H. Guo, and D.S. Liu, 2004. A comparison of standard and hybrid classifier methods for mapping hardwood mortality in areas affected by "sudden oak death," Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(11):1229-1239.
31. Khorram, S., C.S. Biging, N.R. Chrisman, D.R. Colby, R.G. Congalton, J.E. Dobson, R.L. Ferguson, M.F. Goodchild, J.R. Jensen, and T.H. Mace, 1999. Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing-Derived Change Detection, Monograph, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
32. King, R.S., M.E. Baker, D.F. Whigham, D.E. Weller, T.E. Jordan, P.F. Kazyak, and M.K. Hurd, 2005. Spatial considerations for linking watershed land cover to ecological indicators in streams, Ecological Applications, 15:137-153.
33. Ludwig, R., M. Probeck, and W. Mauser, 2003. Mesoscale water balance modelling in the Upper Danube watershed using subscale land cover information derived from NOAA-AVHRR imagery and GIS-techniques, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28:1351-1364.
34. Lunetta, R.S., J. Ediriwickrema, J. Iiames, D.M. Johnson, J.G. Lyon, A. McKerrow, and A. Pilant, 2003. A quantitative assessment of a combined spectral and GIS rule-based land-cover classification in the Neuse River Basin of North Carolina, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(2):299-310.
35. Maeder, J., S. Narumalani, D.C. Rundquist, R.L. Perk, J. Schalles, K. Hutchins, and J. Keck, 2002. Classifying and mapping general coral-reef structure using Ikonos data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 68(12):1297-1305.
36. McMahon, G., and O. Lloyd, 1995. Water Quality Assessment of the Albemarle-Pamlico Drainage Basin, North Carolina and Virginia: Environmental Setting and Water-Quality Issues, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 95-136, U.S. Geological Survey, Raleigh, North Carolina, 72 p.
37. Miura, H., and S. Midorikawa, 2006. Updating GIS building inventory data using high-resolution satellite images for earthquake damage assessment: Application to metro Manila, Philippines, Earthquake Spectra, 22:151-168.
38. Morisette, J.T., S. Khorram, and T. Mace, 1999. Land-cover change detection enhanced with generalized linear models, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20:2703-2721.
39. North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2004. North Carolina 303 (d) Impaired Waters List, URL: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/ General_303d.htm (last date accessed: 09 January 2008).
40. Paerl, H.W., J.L. Pinckney, J.M. Fear, and B.L. Peierls, 1998. Ecosystem responses to internal and watershed organic matter loading: Consequences for hypoxia in the eutrophying Neuse river estuary, North Carolina, USA, Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 166:17-25.
41. Pohl, C., and J.L. van Genderen, 1998. Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: Concepts, methods and applications, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19:823-854.
42. Sawaya, K., L. Olmanson, N. Heinert, P. Brezonik, and M. Bauer, 2003. Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales: Land and water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 88:144-156.
43. Segl, K., S. Roessner, U. Heiden, and H. Kaufmann, 2003. Fusion of spectral and shape features for identification of urban surface cover types using reflective and thermal hyperspectral data, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58:99-112.
44. Singh, V., T. Piechota, and D. James, 2003. Hydrologic impacts of disturbed lands treated with dust suppressants, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8:278-286.
45. Song, M., D.L. Civco, and J.D. Hurd, 2005. A competitive pixel-object approach for land cover classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26:4981-4997.
46. Svab, A., and K. Osti, 2006. High-resolution image fusion: Methods to preserve spectral and spatial resolution, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(5):565-572.
47. Thomas, N., C. Hendrix, and R. Congalton, 2003. A comparison of urban mapping methods using high-resolution digital imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(9):963-972.
48. U. S. Census Bureau, 2006. Population Estimates for the 100 U.S. Counties with the Largest Numerical Increase from April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., URL: http://www.census.gov/Press- Release/www/2006/countypop05-table5.pdf (last date accessed: 09 January 2008).
49. Walsh, C.J., T.D. Fletcher, and A.R. Ladson, 2005. Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: Looking to the catchment to save the stream, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24:690-705.
50. Wang, L.Z., J. Lyons, and P. Kanehl, 2001. Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales, Environmental Management, 28:255-266.
51. Warner, T.A., and K. Steinmaus, 2005. Spatial classification of orchards and vineyards with high spatial resolution panchromatic imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(1):179-187.
52. Williams, E.S., and W.R. Wise, 2006. Hydrologic impacts of alternative approaches to storm water management and land development, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42:443-455.
53. Yang, L., G. Xian, J. Klaver, and B. Deal, 2003. Urban land-cover change detection through sub-pixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69(10):1003-1010.