A hybrid approach to urban land use/cover mapping using Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM +) images

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 25, Issue 14, 2004, Pages 2687-2700

  Lo, C P ^a   Choi, Jinmu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FUZZY SETS; GEODETIC SATELLITES; IMAGE PROCESSING; LAND USE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

IMAGE PROCESSING SOFTWARE PACKAGES; LAND USE MAPS;

REMOTE SENSING;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MAPPING METHOD; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; URBAN AREA;

EID: 3242663578     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160310001618428     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. APLIN, P., 2003, Comparison of simulated IKONOS and SPOT HRV imagery for classifying urban areas. In Remotely Sensed Cities, edited by V. Mesev (London and New York: Taylor and Francis), pp. 23-45.
2. APLIN, P., and ATKINSON, P. M., 2001, Sub-pixel land cover mapping for per-field classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, 2853-2858.
3. BOOTH, D. J., and OLDFIELD, R. B., 1989, A comparison of classification algorithms in terms of speed and accuracy after the application of a post-classification modal filter. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10, 477-492.
4. CONGALTON, R. G., 1991, A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35-46.
5. CUSHNIE, J. L., 1987, The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 8, 15-29.
6. ERDAS, 2001, ERDAS Imagine Tour Guides (Atlanta, Georgia: ERDAS, Inc.).
7. FISHER, P. F., and PATHIRANA, S., 1990, The evaluation of fuzzy membership of land cover classes in the suburban zone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 34, 121-132.
8. IRONS, J. R., MARKHAM, B. L., NELSON, R. F., TOLL, D. L., and STAUFFER, M. L., 1985, The effects of spatial resolution on the classification of Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6, 1385-1403.
9. JENSEN, J. R., 1996, Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall).
10. LEWIS, H. G., BROWN, M., and TATNALL, A. R. L., 2000, Incorporation uncertainty in land cover classification from remote sensing imagery. Advances in Space Research, 26, 1123-1126.
11. MASEK, J. G., HONZAK, M., GOWARD, S. N., LIU, P., and PAK, E., 2001, Landsat-7 ETM + as an observatory for land cover: initial radiometric and geometric comparisons with Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper. Remote Sensing of Environment, 78, 118-130.
12. MASELLI, F., RODOLFI, A., and CONESE, C., 1996, Fuzzy classification of spatially degraded Thematic Mapper data for estimation of sub-pixel components. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, 537-551.
13. MATHER, P. M., 1999, Land cover classification revisited. In Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis, edited by P. M. Atkinson and N. J. Tate (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons), pp. 7-16.
14. QUATTROCHI, D. A., and LUVALL, J. C., 1999, Urban sprawl and urban pall: assessing the impacts of Atlanta's growth on meteorology and air quality using remote sensing and GIS. Geographical Information Systems, 9, 26-33.
15. RESEARCH ATLANTA INC, 1993, The Dynamics of Change: An Analysis of Growth In Metropolitan Atlanta Over The Past Two Decades (Atlanta, Georgia: Policy Research Center, Georgia State University).
16. TOLL, D. L., 1985, Effect of Landsat Thematic Mapper sensor parameters on land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 17, 129-140.
17. TSO, B., and MATHER, P. M., 2001, Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data (London and New York: Taylor and Francis).
18. VAN GENDEREN, J. L., and LOCK, B. F., 1977, Testing land-use map accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 43, 1135-1137.
19. WANG, F., 1990, Improving remote sensing image analysis through fuzzy information representation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56, 1163-1169.
20. WELCH, R., 1982, Spatial resolution requirements for urban studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 3, 139-146.
21. XU, B., GONG, P., SETO, E., and SPEAR, R., 2003, Comparison of gray-level reduction and different texture spectrum encoding methods for land-sue classification using a panchromatic Ikonos image. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 529-536.
22. YANG, X., and LO, C. P., 2002, Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 1775-1798.
23. ZHANG, J., and FOODY, G. M., 2001, Fully-fuzzy supervised classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery: statistical and artificial neutral network approaches. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, 615-628.