In the context of multiple intelligences theory, intelligent data analysis of learning styles was based on rough set theory

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 613-618

  Narli, Serkan ^a   Özgen, Kemal ^a   Alkan, Hüseyin ^a  

^a DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Data mining; Learning styles; Multiple intelligence theory; Rough sets

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052396396     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: 18733425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abbey D.S., Hunt D.E., Weiser J.C. Variations on a theme by Kolb: A new perspective for understanding counseling and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist 1985, 13(3):477-501.
2. Armstrong T. Multiple intelligences in the classroom 2000, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
3. Can A. Baskin çoklu zekâ boyutlari ile öǧrenme stilleri arasindaki ilişkiler. XIII. Ulusal Eǧitim Bilimleri Kurultayi, 5-7 Eylül 2007, Gazi Osmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Tokat.
4. Demir R. Dokuzuncu sinif öǧrencilerinin öǧrenme stilleri ve çoklu zekâ alanlarinin incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü 2010, Yayimlanmamiş Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana.
5. Denig S. Multiple intelligences and learning styles: Two complementary dimensions. Teacher College 2004, 106(1):96-111.
6. Dunn R., Denig S., Lovelace M. Two sides of the same coin or different strokes for different folks?. Teacher Librarian 2001, 28(3):9-15.
7. Garner I. Problems and inconsistencies with Kolb's learning styles. Educational Psychology 2000, 20(3):341-348.
8. Guild P.B. Where do the learning theories overlap?. Educational Leadership 1997, 55(1):30-31.
9. Hassanien A.E. Rough set approach for attribute reduction and rule generation: A case of patients with suspected breast cancer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55(11):954-962.
10. Hunt D.E. Beginning with ourselves in practice, theory and human affairs 1987, Brookline Books, Cambridge MA.
11. Kappe F.R., Boekholt L., den Rooyen C., Van der Flier H. A predictive validity study of the learning style questionnaire (LSQ) using multiple, specific learning criteria. Learning and Individual Differences 2009, 19:464-467.
12. Kazu I.Y., Özdemir O. Öǧrencilerin bireysel özelliklerinin yapay zeka ile belirlenmesi (Bulanik mantik örneǧi). Akademik Bilişim 2009 Konferansi, 11-13 Şubat 2009 2009, 457-466. Harran Üniversitesi, Şanliurfa, (last accessed: 29.12.2010).
13. Kolb D.A. Learning style inventory - version 3.1. Hay Group 2005.
14. Kolb Y.A., Kolb D.A. Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. The Academy of Management Learning and Education 2005, 4(2):193-212.
15. Kryszkiewicz M., Rybinski H. Reducing information systems with uncertain real value attributes. Proceedings (IPMU'96) 1996, Vol. II:1165. July 1-5, Grenada.
16. Lavrajc N., Keravnou E., Zupan B. Intelligent data analysis in medicine and pharmacology 1997, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Lin T.Y., Cercone N. Rough sets and data mining 1997, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
18. Mainemelis C., Boyatzis R., Kolb D.A. Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning 2002, 33(1):5-33.
19. McCarthy B., Germain C.S., Lippitt L. The 4MAT research guide, reviews of literature on individual differences and hemispheric specialization and their influence on learning 2006, About Learning Incorporated, Illinois.
20. Metallidou P., Platsidou M. Kolb's learning style inventory-1985: Validity issues and relations with metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving strategies. Learning and Individual Differences 2008, 18(1):114-119.
21. Narli S. An alternative evaluation method for likert type attitude scales: Rough set data analysis. Scientific Research and Essays 2010, 5(6):519-528.
22. Narli S., Ozcelik Z.A. Data mining in topology education: Rough set data analysis. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 2010, 5(9):1428-1437.
23. Narli S., Yorek N., Sahin M., Uşak M. Can we make definite categorization of student attitudes? A rough set approach to investigate students' implicit attitudinal typologies toward living things. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2010, 19:456-469.
24. Özek M.B., Akpolat Z.H., Orhan A. Web tabanli akilli ög̀retim sistemlerinde tip-2 bulanik mantik kullanarak ög̀renci ög̀renme stili modelleme. Firat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 2010, 22(1):37-44.
25. Özgen K., Tatarog̀lu B., Alkan H. An examination of multiple intelligence domains and learning styles of pre-service mathematics teachers: Their reflections in mathematics education. Educational Research and Reviews 2011, 6(2):168-181.
26. Polkowski L., Skowron A. Rough sets in knowledge discovery. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing Series 1998, vols. 1-2. Physica-Verlag/Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. J. Kacprzyk (Ed.).
27. Polkowski L., Skowron A. Rough sets and current trends in computing. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Series 1998, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg/Berlin. R. Goebel, J. Siekmann, W. Wahlster (Eds.).
28. Rayner S. Researching style: Epistemology, paradigm shifts and research interest groups. Learning and Individual Differences 2011, 21(3):255-262. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.020.
29. Saban A. Ög̀renme - ög̀retme süreci, yeni teori ve yaklaşimlar (3.Baski) 2004, Nobel Yayin Daǧitim, Ankara.
30. Silver H., Strong R., Perini M. Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Educational Leadership 1997, 55(1):22-27.
31. Uysal M.P. Öǧrenme stillerinin bulanik mantikla modellenmesi. 4th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium 2010, 1040-1045. Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
32. Wu S., Alrabah S. A cross-cultural study of Taiwanese and Kuwaiti EFL students' learning styles and multiple intelligences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 2009, 46(4):393-403.
33. Yannibelli V., Godoy D., Amandi A. A genetic algorithm approach to recognise students' learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments 2006, 14(1):55-78.
34. Yorek N., Narli S. Modeling of cognitive structure of uncertain scientific concepts using fuzzy-rough sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Example of the life concept. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 2009, 17(5):747-769.