Responses of Gmelina arborea, a tropical deciduous tree species, to elevated atmospheric CO2: Growth, biomass productivity and carbon sequestration efficacy

Plant Science

Volumn 181, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 428-438

  Rasineni, Girish K ^a   Guha, Anirban ^a   Reddy, Attipalli R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD   (India)

Author keywords

Biomass yields; Carbon sequestration; Elevated CO2; Gmelina arborea; Productivity

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL; CHLOROPHYLL A; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERE; BIOMASS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYMOLOGY; FLUORESCENCE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LAMIACEAE; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE; TROPIC CLIMATE;

AGRICULTURE; ATMOSPHERE; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CHLOROPHYLL; FLUORESCENCE; LAMIACEAE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STEMS; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES; TROPICAL CLIMATE;

GMELINA; GMELINA ARBOREA;

EID: 80052329441     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate change mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, USA. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Land use, Land-use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. R. Watson, I.R. Noble, B. Bolin, N.H. Ravindranath, D.J. Verardo, D.J. Dokken (Eds.).
3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate change 2001, impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. White. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA. J.J. McCarthy, O.F. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken (Eds.).
4. Lemus R., Lal R. Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 2005, 24:1-21.
5. Brown S. Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 116:363-372.
6. Winjum J.K., Dixon R.K., Schroeder P.E. Forest management and carbon storage: a look at 12 key forest nations. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1993, 70:239-257.
7. Gunderson C.A., Sholtis J.D., Wullschleger S.D., Tissue D.T., Hanson P.J., Norby R.J. Environmental and stomatal control of photosynthetic enhancement in the canopy of a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) plantation during 3 years of CO2 enrichment. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25:379-393.
8. Long S.P., Ainsworth E.A., Rogers A., Ort D.R. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants face the future. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55:591-628.
9. Urban O. Physiological impacts of elevated CO2 concentration ranging from molecular to whole plant responses. Photosynthetica 2003, 41:9-20.
10. Streck C., Scholz S.M. The role of forests in global climate change: whence we come and where we go. Int. Aff. 2006, 82:861-879.
11. Dyson F.J. Can we control the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?. Energy 1977, 2:287-291.
12. Norby R.J., DeLuciac E.H., Gielend B., Calfapietrae C., Giardinaf C.P., King J.S., Ledforda J., McCarthy H.R., Moorei D.J.P., Ceulemans R., Angelis P.D., Finzi A.C., Karnosky D.F., Kubiske M.E., Lukac M., Pregitzerk K.S., Scarascia-Mugnozzan G.E., Schlesingerb W.H., Oren R. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:18052-18056.
13. Rae A.M., Tricker P.J., Bunn S.M., Taylor G. Adaptation of tree growth to elevated CO2: quantitative trait loci for biomass in Populus. New Phytol. 2007, 175:59-69.
14. Eamus D., Ceulemans R. Effects of greenhouse gases on the gas exchange of forest trees. The Impact of Carbon Dioxide and other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems 2001, 17-56. Wallingford, CABI Press. D.F. Karnosky, R. Ceulemans, J.L. Scarascia-Mugnozza, J.L. Innes (Eds.).
15. Herrick J.D., Thomas R.B. No photosynthetic down-regulation in sweet gum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) after three years of CO2 enrichment at Duke Forest FACE experiment. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24:53-64.
16. Noormets A., McDonald E.P., Kruger E.L., Isebrands J.G., Dickson R.E., Karnosky D.F. The effect of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on leaf- and branch-level photosynthesis and potential plant level carbon gain in aspen. Trees Struct. Funct. 2001, 15:262-270.
17. Norby R.J., Wullschleger S.D., Gunderson C.A., Johnson D.W., Ceulemans R. Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22:683-714.
18. Norby R.J., Todd D.E., Fults J., Johnson D.W. Allometric determination of tree growth in a CO2-enriched sweetgum stand. New Phytol. 2001, 150:477-487.
19. Cheng L., Fuchigami L.H. Rubisco activation state decreases with increasing nitrogen content in apple leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51:1687-1694.
20. Strasser B.J., Strasser R.J. Measuring fast fluorescence transients to address environment questions: the JIP-test. Photosynthesis: from Light to Biosphere 1995, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht-Boston/London. P. Mathis (Ed.).
21. Albert K.R., Mikkelsen T.N., Ro-Poulsen H. Effects of ambient versus reduced UV-B radiation on high arctic Salix arctica assessed by measurements and calculations of chlorophyll-a-fluorescence parameters from fluorescence transients. Physiol. Plant. 2005, 124:208-226.
22. Strasser R.J., Govindjee The Fo and O-J-I-P fluorescence rise in higher plants and algae. Regulation of Chloroplast Biogenesis 1992, Plenum Press, New York. J.H. Argyroudi-Akoyunoglou (Ed.).
23. Radford P.J. Growth analysis formulae-their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 1967, 7:171-175.
24. Newbould P.J. Methods for Estimating the Primary Production of Forests, IBP Handbook No. 2 1967, International Biological Programme, Oxford.
25. Rajput S.S., Shukla N.K., Gupta V.K., Jain J.D. Timber Mechanics: Strength Classification and Grading of Timber, ICFRE-Publication-38 1996, New Forest, Dehradun.
26. Negi J.D.S., Manhas R.K., Chauhan P.S. Carbon allocation in different components of some tree species of India: a new approach for carbon estimation. Curr. Sci. 2003, 85:101-104.
27. Centritto M., Lee H., Jarvis P. Interactive effects of elevated [CO2] and water stress on cherry (Prunus avium) seedlings. I. Growth, total plant water use efficiency and uptake. New Phytol. 1999, 141:129-140.
28. Zhang S.R., Dang Q.L., Yu X.G. Nutrient and [CO2] elevation had synergistic effects on biomass production but not on biomass allocation of white birch seedlings. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2006, 234:238-244.
29. Anderson L.J., Maherali H., Johnson H.B., Polley H.W., Jackson R.B. Gas exchange and photosynthetic acclimation over sub ambient to elevated CO2 in C3-C4 grassland. Global Change Biol. 2001, 7:693-707.
30. Possell M., Hewitt C.N. Gas exchange and photosynthetic performance of the topical tree Acacia nigrescens when grown in different CO2 concentrations. Planta 2009, 229:837-846.
31. Jensen R.G. Activation of Rubisco regulates photosynthesis at high temperature and CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:12937-12938.
32. Beedlow P.A., Tingey D.T., Phillips D.L., Hogsett W.E., Olszyk D.M. Rising atmospheric CO2 and carbon sequestration in forests. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2:315-322.
33. Ainsworth E.A., Rogers A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: molecular mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:258-270.
34. Woodward F.I. Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from pre-industrial levels. Nature 1987, 327:617-618.
35. Paoletti E., Grulke N.E. Does living in elevated CO2 ameliorate tree response to ozone? A review on stomatal responses. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 137:483-493.
36. Eamus D., Jarvis P.G. The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric CO2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1989, 19:1-55.
37. Field C.B., Jackson R.B., Mooney H.A. Stomatal responses to increased CO2 implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:1214-1225.
38. Curtis P.S. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 1996, 19:127-137.
39. Farquhar G.D., Sharkey T.D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1982, 33:317-345.
40. Rey A., Jarvis P.G. Long-term photosynthetic acclimation to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration in young birch (Betula pendula) trees. Tree Physiol. 1998, 18:441-450.
41. Assmann S.M. The cellular basis of guard cell sensing of rising CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22:629-637.
42. Sage R.F. How terrestrial organisms sense signal and respond to carbondioxide. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2002, 42:469-480.
43. Herrick J.D., Maherali H., Thomas R.B. Reduced stomatal conductance in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) sustained over long-term CO2 enrichment. New Phytol. 2004, 162:387-396.
44. Warren C.R., Adams M.A. Evergreen trees do not maximize instantaneous photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9:270-274.
45. Coleman J.R. Carbonic anhydrase and its role in photosyhthesis. Photosynthesis: Physiology and Metabolism 2000, The Kluwer Academic, Netherlands. R.C. Leegood, T.D. Sharkey, S. von Caemmerer (Eds.).
46. von Caemmerer S., Quick W.P. Rubisco: physiology in vivo. Photosynthesis: Physiology and Metabolism 2000, The Kluwer Academic, Netherlands. R.C. Leegood, T.D. Sharkey, S. von Caemmerer (Eds.).
47. Messinger S.M., Buckley T.N., Mott K.A. Evidence for the involvement of photosynthetic process in the stomatal responses to CO2. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140:771-778.
48. Sharkey T.D. Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: physics, physiology and rate limitations. Bot. Rev. 1985, 51:53-105.
49. Aranjuelo I., Pérez P., Hernández L., Irigoyen J.J., Zita G., Martínez-Carrasco R., et al. The response of nodulated alfalfa to water supply, temperature and elevated CO2: photosynthetic down-regulation. Physiol. Plant. 2005, 123:348-358.
50. Moore B.D., Cheng S.H., Sims D., Seemann J.R. The biochemical and molecular basis for photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22:567-582.
51. Reich P.B., Hobbie S.E., Lee T., Ellsworth D.S., West J.B., Tilman D., Knops J.M.H., Naeem S., Trost J. Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature 2006, 440:922-925.
52. Rogers A., Gibon Y., Stitt M., Morgan P.B., Bernacchi C.J., Ort D.R., Long S.P. Increased C availability at elevated carbon dioxide concentration improves N assimilation in a legume. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:1651-1658.
53. Stitt M., Krapp A. The molecular physiological basis for the interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nutrients. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22:583-622.
54. Sage R.F. Acclimation of photosynthesis to increasing atmospheric CO2; the gas exchange perspective. Photosynth. Res. 1994, 39:351-368.
55. Long S.P. Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated?. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14:729-739.
56. Aranjuelo I., Erice G., Norgues S., Morales F., Irigoyen J.J., Sanchez-Diaz M. The mechanism(s) involved in the photoprotection of PSII at elevated CO2 in nodulated alfalfa plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 64:295-306.
57. Roden J.S., Ball M.C. The effect of elevated [CO2] on growth and photosynthesis of two eucalyptus species exposed to high temperatures and water deficits. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111:909-919.
58. Bernacchi C.J., Pimentel C., Long S.P. In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26:1419-1430.
59. Rogers A., Humphries S.W. A mechanistic evaluation of photosynthetic acclimation at elevated CO2. Global Change Biol. 2000, 6:1005-1011.
60. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 116:381-389.
61. Jana B.Kr., Biswas S., Majumder M.P., Roy Kr., Mazumdar A. Carbon sequestration rate and aboveground biomass carbon potential of four young species. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ. 2009, 2:15-24.
62. Strain B., Thomas R. Anticipated effects of elevated CO2 and climate change on plants from Mediterranean-type ecosystems utilizing results of studies in other ecosystems. Global Change and Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems 1995, 121-139. Spinger-Verlag, Berlin. J. Moreno, W. Oechel (Eds.).
63. Hogy P., Fangmeier A. Atmospheric CO2 enrichment affects potatoes: 1. Aboveground biomass production and tuber yield. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 30:78-84.
64. Lindroth R.L., Kinney K.K., Platz C.L. Responses of deciduous trees to elevated atmospheric CO2: productivity, phytochemistry and insect performance. Ecology 1993, 74:763-777.
65. Isebrands J.G., McDonald E.P., Kruger E., Hendrey G., Pregitzer K., Percy K., et al. Growth responses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 115:359-371.
66. Korner C. Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytol. 2006, 172:393-411.
67. Wittig V.E., Bernacchi C.J., Zhu X.G., Calfapietra C., Ceulemans R., Deangelis P., Gielen B., Miglietta F., Morgan P.B., Long S.P. Gross primary production is stimulated for three Populus species grown under free-air CO2 enrichment from planting through canopy closure. Global Change Biol. 2005, 11:644-656.