Dimension reduction: Additional benefit of an optimal filter for independent component analysis to extract event-related potentials

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 201, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 269-280

  Cong, Fengyu ^a,b   Leppänen, Paavo H T ^a   Astikainen, Piia ^a   Hämäläinen, Jarmo ^a   Hietanen, Jari K ^b   Ristaniemi, Tapani ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Dimension reduction; Event related potential; Independent component analysis; Linear transformation model; Number of sources; Optimal filter; Overfitting; Wavelet decomposition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FILTER; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CHILD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052314664     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson A., Dinov I.D., Sherin J.E., Quintana J., Yuille A.L., Cohen M.S. Classification of spatially unaligned fMRI scans. Neuroimage 2010, 49:2509-2519.
2. Astikainen P., Hietanen J.K. Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes in facial expressions. Behav Brain Funct 2009, 5:30.
3. Blankertz B., Lemm S., Treder M., Haufe S., Muller K.R. Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components-a tutorial. Neuroimage 2010, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.048.
4. Cichocki A., Washizawa Y., Rutkowski T.M., Bakardjian H., Phan A.H., Choi S., Zhao Q. Noninvasive BCIs: multiway signal-processing array decompositions. Computer 2008, 41:34-42.
5. Comon P. Independent component analysis, a new concept?. Signal Process 1994, 36:287-314.
6. Cong F, Kalyakin I, Li H, Huttunen-Scott T, Huang Y, Lyytinen H, Ristaniemi T. Answering Six Questions in Extracting Children's Mismatch Negativity throughCombining Wavelet Decomposition and Independent Component Analysis. Cogn Neurodynamics 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11571-011-9161-1.
7. Cong F, Kalyakin I, Huttunen-Scott T, Li H, Lyytinen H, Ristaniemi T. Employing timing, frequency and spatial information to extract mismatch negativity of children. Finland, University of Jyväskylä. Reports of Department Mathematical Information Technology, Series B. Scientific Computing, 2010b;No.B4/2010, 31 pp. http://users.jyu.fi/~fecong/TechnicalReport.html.
8. Cong F., Kalyakin I., Ristaniemi T. Can back-projection fully resolve polarity indeterminacy of ICA in study of ERP?. Biomed Signal Process Control 2010, 10.1016/j.bspc.2010.05.006.
9. Cong F., Xu X., Zhou S., Du S., Shi X. Particle filtering based noisy blind source separation. Electron Lett 2007, 43:547-549.
10. Czigler I., Weisz J., Winkler I. ERPs and deviance detection: visual mismatch negativity to repeated visual stimuli. Neurosci Lett 2006, 401:178-182.
11. Daubechies I. Ten lectures on wavelets. Soc Ind Appl Math 1992.
12. Daubechies I., Roussos E., Takerkart S., Benharrosh M., Golden C., D'Ardenne K., Richter W., Cohen J.D., Haxby J. Independent component analysis for brain fMRI does not select for independence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:10415-10422.
13. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
14. Ekman P., Friesen W.V. Pictures of facial affect 1976, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
15. Gao J., Zhu X., Nandi A.K. Independent component analysis for multiple-input multiple-output wireless communication systems. Signal Process 2010, 91:607-623.
16. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 1993, 65:413-497.
17. Hamalainen J.A., Leppanen P.H., Guttorm T.K., Lyytinen H. Event-related potentials to pitch and rise time change in children with reading disabilities and typically reading children. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:100-115.
18. Hao J., Lee I., Lee T.W., Sejnowski T.J. Independent vector analysis for source separation using a mixture of gaussians prior. Neural Comput 2010, 22:1646-1673.
19. Harmony T. Neurometric assessment of brain dysfunction in neurological patients: functional neuroscience 1984, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Himberg J., Hyvarinen A., Esposito F. Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization. Neuroimage 2004, 22:1214-1222.
21. Hyvarinen A. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1999, 10:626-634.
22. Hyvarinen A., Karhunen J., Oja E. Independent component analysis 2001, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
23. Jolliffe I. Principal component analysis 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York, 502 pp. 2nd ed.
24. Kalyakin I., Gonzalez M., Ivannikov I., Lyytinen H. Extraction of the mismatch negativity elicited by sound duration decrements: a comparison of three procedures. Data Knowl Eng 2009, 68:1411-1426.
25. Kalyakin I., Gonzalez N., Joutsensalo J., Huttunen T., Kaartinen J., Lyytinen H. Optimal digital filtering versus difference waves on the mismatch negativity in an uninterrupted sound paradigm. Dev Neuropsychol 2007, 31:429-452.
26. Kalyakin I., Gonzalez N., Karkkainen T., Lyytinen H. Independent component analysis on the mismatch negativity in an uninterrupted sound paradigm. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 174:301-312.
27. Kayser J., Tenke C., Nordby H., Hammerborg D., Hugdahl K., Erdmann G. Event-related potential (ERP) asymmetries to emotional stimuli in a visual half-field paradigm. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:414-426.
28. Khullar S., Michael A., Correa N., Adali T., Baum S.A., Calhoun V.D. Wavelet-based fMRI analysis: 3-D denoising, signal separation, and validation metrics. Neuroimage 2011, 54:2867-2884.
29. Kovacevic N., McIntosh A.R. Groupwise independent component decomposition of EEG data and partial least square analysis. Neuroimage 2007, 35:1103-1112.
30. Makeig S. Frequently asked questions about ICA applied to EEG and MEG data. Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, 2002. http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/~scott/icafaq.html.
31. Makeig S., Debener S., Onton J., Delorme A. Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8:204-210.
32. Makeig S., Jung T.P., Bell A.J., Ghahremani D., Sejnowski T.J. Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:10979-10984.
33. Makeig S., Westerfield M., Jung T.P., Covington J., Townsend J., Sejnowski T.J., Courchesne E. Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. J Neurosci 1999, 19:2665-2680.
34. Mitra S. Digital signal processing-a computer based approach 2005, McGraw-Hill.
35. Niedermeyer E., Lopes da Silva F. Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields 2004, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
36. Nunez P., Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG 2005, Oxford University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
37. Nunez P.L., Silberstein R.B., Cadusch P.J., Wijesinghe R.S., Westdorp A.F., Srinivasan R. A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 90:40-57.
38. Picton T.W., Alain C., Otten L., Ritter W., Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol 2000, 5:111-139.
39. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson R., Miller G.A., Ritter W., Ruchkin D.S., Rugg M.D., Taylor M.J. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:127-152.
40. Rice J. Mathematical statistics and data analysis 2006, Duxbury Press. 3rd ed.
41. Sanei S., Chambers J.A. EEG signal processing 2007, Wiley, 312 pp.
42. Särelä J., Valpola H. Denoising source separation. J Mach Learn Res 2005, 6:233-272.
43. Särelä J., Vigario R. Overlearning in marginal distribution-based ICA: analysis and solutions. J Mach Learn Res 2003, 4:1447-1469.
44. Scherg M., Von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985, 62:32-44.
45. Tervaniemi M., Lehtokoski A., Sinkkonen J., Virtanen J., Ilmoniemi R.J., Naatanen R. Test-retest reliability of mismatch negativity for duration, frequency and intensity changes. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:1388-1393.
46. Vakorin V.A., Kovacevic N., McIntosh A.R. Exploring transient transfer entropy based on a group-wise ICA decomposition of EEG data. Neuroimage 2010, 49:1593-1600.
47. Vigario R., Oja E. BSS and ICA in neuroinformatics: from current practices to open challenges. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2008, 1:50-61.
48. Vigario R., Sarela J., Jousmaki V., Hamalainen M., Oja E. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000, 47:589-593.