Optimal digital filtering versus difference waves on the mismatch negativity in an uninterrupted sound paradigm

Developmental Neuropsychology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 429-452

  Kalyakin, Igor ^a   González, Narciso ^a   Joutsensalo, Jyrki ^a   Huttunen, Tiina ^a   Kaartinen, Jukka ^a   Lyytinen, Heikki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL FILTERING; DYSLEXIA; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 34347350289     PISSN: 87565641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/87565640701229607     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cook, E.W., & Miller, G.A. (1992). Digital filtering: Background and tutorial for psychophysiologists. Psychophysiology, 29, 350-367.
2. Croft, R.J., Chandler, J.S., Barry, R.J., Cooper, N.R., & Clarke, A.R. (2005). EOG correction: A comparison of four methods. Psychophysiology, 42, 16-24.
3. Elberling, C., & Don, M. (1984). Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scandinavian Audiology, 13, 187-197.
4. Furst, M., & Blau, A. (1991). Optimal a posteriori time domain filter for average evoked potentials. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38, 827-833.
5. Harmony, T. (1984). Neurometric assessment of brain dysfunction in neurological patients. In E.R John, & R.W. Thatcher (Series Eds.), Functional Neuroscience, Vol. III. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
6. Hoke, M., Ross, B., Wickesberg, R., & Lutkenhoner, B. (1984). Weighted averaging theory and application to electric response audiometry. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 484-489.
7. Möcks, J., Gasser, T., & Köhler, W. (1988). Basic statistical parameters of event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 2, 61-70.
8. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
9. Näätänen, R., & Escera, C. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Clinical and other applications. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 105-110.
10. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W.K., & Mantysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
11. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T.W. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
12. Picton, W.T., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W., & Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 5, 111-139.
13. Pihko, E., Leppäsaari, T., & Lyytinen, H. (1995). Brain reacts to occasional changes in duration of elements in a continuous sound. NeuroReport, 6, 1215-1218.
14. Sabri, M., & Campbell, K.B. (2002). The effects of digital filtering on mismatch negativity in wakefulness and slow-wave sleep. Journal of Sleep Research, 11, 123-127.
15. Schimmel, H., Rapin, I., & Cohen, M.M. (1974). Improving evoked response audiometry with special reference to the use of machine scoring. Audiology, 13, 33-65.
16. Sinkkonen, J., & Tervaniemi, M. (2000). Towards optimal recording and analysis of the mismatch negativity. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 5, 235-246.
17. Tervaniemi, M., Lehtokoski, A., Sinkkonen, J., Virtanen, J., Ilmoniemi, R.J., & Näätänen, R. (1999). Test-retest reliability of mismatch negativity for duration, frequency and intensity changes. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 1388-1393.
18. Yuen, C.K., & Fraser, D. (1979). Digital spectral analysis. London: Pitman Publishing Ltd.