Variation in childhood skeletal robustness is an important determinant of cortical area in young adults

Bone

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 799-809

  Bhola, Siddharth ^a   Chen, Julia ^a   Fusco, Joseph ^a   Duarte, G Felipe ^a   Andarawis Puri, Nelly ^a   Ghillani, Richard ^a,b   Jepsen, Karl J ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Elmhurst Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Bone growth; Bone mass; Longitudinal; Robustness

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BODY SIZE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MARROW; BONE STRUCTURE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GROWTH RATE; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HEREDITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; METACARPAL BONE; NUTRITION; OSTEOBLAST; SCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; BONE AND BONES; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CHILD; DIAPHYSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METACARPAL BONES; ORGAN SIZE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052277767     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aeberli D., Eser P., Bonel H., Widmer J., Caliezi G., Varisco P.A., et al. Reduced trabecular bone mineral density and cortical thickness accompanied by increased outer bone circumference in metacarpal bone of rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther 2010, 12:R119.
2. Albright F., Smith P.H., Richardson A.M. Post-menopausal osteoporosis. Its clinical features. JAMA 1941, 116:2465-2474.
3. Nordin B.E.C., Barnett E. The clinical and radiological problem of thin bones. Br J Radiol 1961, 34:683-692.
4. Binkley T.L., Berry R., Specker B.L. Methods for measurement of pediatric bone. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2008, 9:95-106.
5. Bradney M., Pearce G., Naughton G., Sullivan C., Bass S., Beck T., et al. Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: a controlled prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1998, 13:1814-1821.
6. Duren D.L., Sherwood R.J., Choh A.C., Czerwinski S.A., Chumlea W.C., Lee M., et al. Quantitative genetics of cortical bone mass in healthy 10-year-old children from the Fels Longitudinal Study. Bone 2007, 40:464-470.
7. Ferrari S., Rizzoli R., Slosman D., Bonjour J.P. Familial resemblance for bone mineral mass is expressed before puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998, 83:358-361.
8. Franklyn M., Oakes B., Field B., Wells P., Morgan D. Section modulus is the optimum geometric predictor for stress fractures and medial tibial stress syndrome in both male and female athletes. Am J Sports Med 2008, 36:1179-1189.
9. Garn S. The earlier gain and the later loss of cortical bone 1970, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL.
10. Jepsen K.J., Courtland H.-W., Nadeau J.H. Genetically-determined phenotype covariation networks control bone strength. J Bone Miner Res 2010, 25:1581-1593.
11. Jepsen K.J., Hu B., Tommasini S.M., Courtland H.-W., Price C., Cordova M., et al. Phenotypic integration of skeletal traits during growth buffers genetic variants affecting the slenderness of femora in inbred mouse strains. Mamm Genome 2009, 20:21-33.
12. Kalkwarf H.J., Gilsanz V., Lappe J.M., Oberfield S., Shepherd J.A., Hangartner T.N., et al. Tracking of bone mass and density during childhood and adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010, 95:1690-1698.
13. Kannus P., Haapasalo H., Sankelo M., Sievanen H., Pasanen M., Heinonen A., et al. Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 1995, 123:27-31.
14. Kannus P., Haapasalo H., Sievanen H., Oja P., Vuori I. The site-specific effects of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density and content. Bone 1994, 15:279-284.
15. Karasik D., Shimabuku N.A., Zhou Y., Zhang Y., Cupples L.A., Kiel D.P., et al. A genome wide linkage scan of metacarpal size and geometry in the Framingham Study. Am J Hum Biol 2008, 20:663-670.
16. Khan K., McKay H.A., Haapasalo H., Bennell K.L., Forwood M.R., Kannus P., et al. Does childhood and adolescence provide a unique opportunity for exercise to strengthen the skeleton?. J Sci Med Sport 2000, 3:150-164.
17. Kimura K. Growth of the second metacarpal according to chronological age and skeletal maturation. Anat Rec 1976, 184:147-157.
18. LaCroix A.Z., Beck T.J., Cauley J.A., Lewis C.E., Bassford T., Jackson R., et al. Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density?. Osteoporos Int 2010, 21:919-929.
19. Landin L., Nilsson B.E. Bone mineral content in children with fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983, 292-296.
20. Lazenby R.A. Bias and agreement for radiogrammetric estimates of cortical bone geometry. Invest Radiol 1997, 32:12-18.
21. Lazenby R.A. Prediction of cross-sectional geometry from metacarpal radiogrammetry: a validation study. Am J Hum Biol 2002, 14:74-80.
22. Leonard M.B., Shults J., Elliott D.M., Stallings V.A., Zemel B.S. Interpretation of whole body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measures in children: comparison with peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 2004, 34:1044-1052.
23. Li R., Tsaih S.-W., Shockley K., Stylianou I.M., Wergedal J., Paigen B., et al. Structural model analysis of multiple quantitative traits. PLoS Genet 2006, 2:1046-1057.
24. Loro M.L., Sayre J., Roe T.F., Goran M.I., Kaufman F.R., Gilsanz V. Early identification of children predisposed to low peak bone mass and osteoporosis later in life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85:3908-3918.
25. McCammon R.W. Human growth and development 1970, Thomas, Springfield, IL.
26. Milgrom C., Giladi M., Simkin A., Rand N., Kedem R., Kashtan H., et al. The area moment of inertia of the tibia: a risk factor for stress fractures. J Biomech 1989, 22:1243-1248.
27. Moro M., van der Meulen M.C., Kiratli B.J., Marcus R., Bachrach L.K., Carter D.R. Body mass is the primary determinant of midfemoral bone acquisition during adolescent growth. Bone 1996, 19:519-526.
28. Nielsen S.P. The metacarpal index revisited: a brief overview. J Clin Densitom 2001, 4:199-207.
29. Pandey N., Bhola S., Goldstone A., Chen F., Chrzanowski J., Terranova C.J., et al. Inter-individual variation in functionally adapted trait sets is established during post-natal growth and predictable based on bone robusticity. J Bone Miner Res 2009, 24:1969-1980.
30. Petit M.A., McKay H.A., MacKelvie K.J., Heinonen A., Khan K.M., Beck T.J. A randomized school-based jumping intervention confers site and maturity-specific benefits on bone structural properties in girls: a hip structural analysis study. J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17:363-372.
31. Rivadeneira F., Zillikens M.C., De Laet C.E., Hofman A., Uitterlinden A.G., Beck T.J., et al. Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:1781-1790.
32. Ruff C. Growth in bone strength, body size, and muscle size in a juvenile longitudinal sample. Bone 2003, 33:317-329.
33. Ruff C. Growth tracking of femoral and humeral strength from infancy through late adolescence. Acta Paediatr 2005, 94:1030-1037.
34. Ruff C.B., Walker A., Trinkaus E. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III: Ontogeny. Am J Phys Anthropol 1994, 93:35-54.
35. Seeman E., Delmas P.D. Bone quality-the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 2006, 354:2250-2261.
36. Specker B., Binkley T. Randomized trial of physical activity and calcium Supplementation on bone mineral content in 3- to 5-year-old children. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18:885-892.
37. Sumner D.R., Andriacchi T.P. Adaptation to differential loading: comparison of growth-related changes in cross-sectional properties of the human femur and humerus. Bone 1996, 19:121-126.
38. Susanne C., Defrise-Gussenhoven E., Van Wanseele P., Tassin A. Genetic and environmental factors in head and face measurements of Belgian twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1983, 32:229-238.
39. Szulc P., Munoz F., Duboeuf F., Marchand F., Delmas P.D. Low width of tubular bones is associated with increased risk of fragility fracture in elderly men-the MINOS study. Bone 2006, 38:595-602.
40. Tommasini S.M., Nasser P., Hu B., Jepsen K.J. Biological co-adaptation of morphological and composition traits contributes to mechanical functionality and skeletal fragility. J Bone Miner Res 2008, 23:236-246.
41. Tommasini S.M., Nasser P., Schaffler M.B., Jepsen K.J. Relationship between bone morphology and bone quality in male tibias: implications for stress fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:1372-1380.
42. Wang X.F., Duan Y., Beck T.J., Seeman E. Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age. Bone 2005, 36:978-986.
43. Zebaze R.M., Jones A., Knackstedt M., Maalouf G., Seeman E. Construction of the femoral neck during growth determines its strength in old age. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:1055-1061.