The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 523-528

  Biais, Matthieu ^a,b   Stecken, Laurent ^a   Ottolenghi, Laetitia ^a   Roullet, Stéphanie ^a   Quinart, Alice ^a   Masson, Françoise ^a   Sztark, François ^a,b  

^a HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; ATRACURIUM; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; HETASTARCH; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BODY TEMPERATURE MONITORING; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEVICE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT MONITORING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETRY; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIDAL VOLUME; VASCULAR SURGERY; VENTILATED PATIENT;

EID: 80052268372     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182240054     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Conway DH, Mayall R, Abdul-Latif MS, Gilligan S, Tackaberry C. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 2002;57:845-9 (Pubitemid 35021505)
2. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, el-Moalem H, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:820-6
3. Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Rohm KD, Suttner S. Goaldirected intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: A randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010;14:R18
4. Poeze M, Greve JW, Ramsay G. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization: Relationship to methodological quality. Crit Care 2005;9:R771-9
5. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:65-71 (Pubitemid 34048564)
6. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1313-21 (Pubitemid 29001568)
7. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Revel P, Sztark F. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:761-8
8. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing offpump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005;128:848-54 (Pubitemid 41140517)
9. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:134-8 (Pubitemid 30469810)
10. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:392-8 (Pubitemid 34328021)
11. Pinsky MR. Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1008-10 (Pubitemid 38833349)
12. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Augarde R, Prin S, Page B, Beauchet A, Jardin F. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support revisited by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:671-6 (Pubitemid 37179949)
13. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005;103:419-28 (Pubitemid 41076740)
14. Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review: Complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Crit Care 2002;6:199-204
15. Cohen A, Reyes R, Kirk M, Fulks RM. Osler's nodes, pseudoaneurysm formation, and sepsis complicating percutaneous radial artery cannulation. Crit Care Med 1984;12:1078-9 (Pubitemid 15178830)
16. Evans PJ, Kerr JH. Arterial occlusion after cannulation. BMJ 1975;3:197-9
17. McEllistrem RF, O'Toole DP, Keane P. Post-cannulation radial artery aneurysm: A rare complication. Can J Anaesth 1990;37: 907-9 (Pubitemid 20376731)
18. Slogoff S, Keats AS, Arlund C. On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 1983;59:42-7 (Pubitemid 13067810)
19. Penáz J, Voigt A, Teichmann W. Contribution to the continuous indirect blood pressure measurement [in German]. Z Gesamte Inn Med 1976;31:1030-3 (Pubitemid 8013450)
20. Epstein RH, Bartkowski RR, Huffnagle S. Continuous noninvasive finger blood pressure during controlled hypotension: A comparison with intraarterial pressure. Anesthesiology 1991;75: 796-803
21. Gibbs NM, Larach DR, Derr JA. The accuracy of Finapres noninvasive mean arterial pressure measurements in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 1991;74:647-52
22. Philippe EG, Hebert JL, Coirault C, Zamani K, Lecarpentier Y, Chemla D. A comparison between systolic aortic root pressure and finger blood pressure. Chest 1998;113:1466-74 (Pubitemid 28307145)
23. Stokes DN, Clutton-Brock T, Patil C, Thompson JM, Hutton P. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of continuous arterial pressure using the Finapres. Br J Anaesth 1991;67:26-35
24. Jeleazcov C, Krajinovic L, Munster T, Birkholz T, Fried R, Schuttler J, Fechner J. Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAP™) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: Assessment during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:264-72
25. Biais M, Vidil L, Roullet S, Masson F, Quinart A, Revel P, Sztark F. Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement: Evaluation of CNAP device during vascular surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010;29:530-5
26. Minto C, Schnider T, Egan T, Youngs E, Lemmens H, Gambus P, Billard V, Hoke J, Moore K, Hermann D, Muir K, Mandema J, Shafer S. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology 1997;86:10-23 (Pubitemid 27043998)
27. Minto C, Schnider T, Shafer S. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology 1997;86:24-33
28. Schnider T, Minto C, Shafer S, Gambus P, Andresen C, Goodale D, Youngs E. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 1999;90:1506-16
29. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA. Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:1001-4 (Pubitemid 13202250)
30. Ludbrook J. Advantages of permutation (randomization) tests in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1994;21:673-86 (Pubitemid 24321612)
31. Berger VW. Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials. Stat Med 2000;19:1319-28 (Pubitemid 30305473)
32. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307-10 (Pubitemid 16134762)
33. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43 (Pubitemid 13033817)
34. Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, Degryse C, Sztark F. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:407-13
35. Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, Kipnis E, Onimus J, Robin E, Lebuffe G, Decoene C, Pruvot FR, Vallet B. Noninvasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:808-16 (Pubitemid 44823665)
36. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1092-7
37. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, Zogheib E, Lobjoie E, Tinturier F, Galy C, Slama M, Dupont H. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2570-5
38. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Vallet A, Cochard JF, Revel P, Sztark F. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1480-6
39. Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, Peterson A, Manecke GR Jr. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: A review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23:401-6
40. Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Diaz Monrove JC. Arterial pressure changes during the Valsalva maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:77-84
41. Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Diaz Monrove JC. Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2009;13:R142