The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics

Anesthesiology

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1502-1516

  Schnider, Thomas W ^e   Minto, Charles F ^a   Shafer, Steven L ^b   Gambus, Pedro L ^c   Andresen, Corina ^f   Goodale, David B ^d   Youngs, Elizabeth J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HOSPITAL DE VILADECANS   (Spain)

^d ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^f NONE

Author keywords

Convolution; Covariates; Effect site; Electroencephalogram; Intravenous anesthetics; Modeling; Population; Semilinear canonical correlation

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SLEEP; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROPOFOL;

EID: 0033024002     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arden JR, Holley FO, Stanski DR: Increased sensitivity to etomidate in the elderly: Initial distribution versus altered brain response. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1986; 65:19-27
2. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJM, Gambus PL, Billard V, Hoke JF, Moore KHP, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL: Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1997; 86:10-23
3. Jacobs JR, Reves JG, Marty J, White WD, Bai SA, Smith LR: Aging increases pharmacodynamic sensitivity to the hypnotic effects of midazolam. Anesth Analg. 1995; 80:143-8
4. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Shafer SL, Youngs EJ: The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1998; 88:1170-82
5. Scott JC, Ponganis KV, Stanski DR: EEG quantitation of narcotic effect: The comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1985; 62:234-41
6. Buhrer M, Maitre PO, Hung OR, Ebling WF, Shafer SL, Stanski DR: Thiopental pharmacodynamics. I. Defining the pseudo-steady-state serum concentration-EEG effect relationship. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1992; 77: 226-36
7. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Fiset P, Gregg KM, Shafer SL: Semilinear canonical correlation applied to the measurement of the electroencephalographic effects of midazolam and flumazenil reversal. ANESTHESTOLOGY 1996; 84:510-9
8. Billard V, Gambus PL, Chamoun N, Stanski DR, Shafer SL: A comparison of spectral edge, delta power, and bispectral index as EEG measures of alfentanil, propofol, and midazolam drug effect. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 61:45-58
9. Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Wronski M, Marino P, Tong WP, Bedford RF: EEG and memory effects of low-dose infusions of propofol. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69:246-54
10. Flaishon R, Windsor A, Sigl J, Sebel PS: Recovery of consciousness after thiopental or propofol. Bispectral index and isolated forearm technique. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1997; 86:613-9
11. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P: Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1997; 86:836-47
12. Forrest FC, Tooley MA, Saunders PR, Prys-Roberts C: Propofol infusion and the suppression of consciousness: The EEG and dose requirements. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72:35-41
13. Dutta S, Matsumoto Y, Gothgen NU, Ebling WF: Concentration-EEG effect relationship of propofol in rats. J Pharm Sci 1997; 86:37-43
14. Gregg KM, Varvel JR, Shafer SL: Application of semilinear canonical correlation to the measurement of opioid drug effect. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1992; 20:611-35
15. Gambus PL, Gregg KM, Shafer SL: Validation of the alfentanil canonical univariate parameter as a measure of opioid effect on the electroencephalogram. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1995; 83:747-56
16. Hull CJ, Van Beem HB, McLeod K, Sibbald A, Watson MJ: A pharmacodynamic model for pancuronium. Br J Anaesth 1978; 50: 1113-23
17. Sheiner LB, Stanski DR, Vozeh S, Miller RD, Ham J: Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d-tubocurarine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 25:358-71
18. Homer TD, Stanski DR: The effect of increasing age on thiopental disposition and anesthetic requirement. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1985; 62: 714-24
19. Stanski DR, Maitre PO: Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of thiopental: The effect of age revisited. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1990; 72:412-22
20. Scott JC, Stanski DR: Decreased fentanyl and alfentanil dose requirements with age. A simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987; 240:159-66
21. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II Model application. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1997; 86:24-33
22. Billard V, Moulla F, Bourgain JL, Megnigbeto A, Stanski DR: Hemodynamic response to induction and intubation. Propofol/fentanyl interaction. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1994; 81:1384-93
23. Shafer A, Doze VA, Shafer SL, White PF: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1988; 69:348-56
24. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Monta K: Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1997; 87:213-27
25. Vuyk J, Engbers FH, Lemmens HJ, Burm AG, Vletter AA, Gladines MP, Bovill JG: Pharmacodynamics of propofol in female patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1992; 77:3-9