Molecular support for a basal grade of morphologically distinct, monotypic genera in the species-rich vanguerieae alliance (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae): Its systematic and conservation implications

Taxon

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 941-952

  Razafimandimbison, Sylvain G ^a   Kainulainen, Kent ^a   Wong, Khoon M ^b   Beaver, Katy ^c   Bremer, Birgitta ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SINGAPORE BOTANIC GARDENS   (Singapore)

^c Plant Conservation Action Group   (Seychelles)

Author keywords

Conservation; Crossopteryx; Glionnetia; Jackiopsis; Molecular systematics; Scyphiphora; Trailliaedoxa

Indexed keywords

COFFEE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONSERVATION STATUS; DICOTYLEDON; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC MARKER; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; RED LIST; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMY;

CROSSOPTERYX; IXOROIDEAE; RUBIACEAE; SCYPHIPHORA; VANGUERIEAE;

EID: 80052186899     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.604001     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Aiken, S.R. & Leigh, C.L. 1992. Vanishing rain forests: The ecological transition in Malaysia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Alejandro, G.D., Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Liede-Schumann, S. 2005. Polyphyly of Mussaenda inferred from ITS and trnT-F data and its implication for generic limits in Mussaendeae (Rubiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92: 544-557.
3. Anderson, I.P. & Bowen, M.R. 2000. Fire zones and the threat to the wetlands of Sumatra, Indonesia. Palembang: Forest Fire Prevention and Control Project.
4. Andersson, L. & Antonelli, A. 2005. Phylogeny of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae), its position in Cinchonoideae, and description of a new genus, Ciliosemina. Taxon 54: 17-28.
5. Andersson, L. & Rova, J.H.E. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 214: 161-186.
6. Andreasen, K., Baldwin, B.G. & Bremer, B. 1999. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear rDNA ITS region in subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae): Comparisons with cpDNA rbcL sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 217: 119-135.
7. Andreasen, K. & Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogeny of the subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae). Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 119-138.
8. Andreasen, K. & Bremer, B. 2000. Combined phylogenetic analysis in the Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae: Morphology, nuclear and chloroplast DNA data. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1731-1748.
9. Backlund, A. & Bremer, K. 1998. To be or not to be: Principles of classification and monotypic plant families. Taxon 47: 391-400.
10. Backlund, M., Oxelman, B. & Bremer, B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1029-1043.
11. Baillon, H. 1878. Sur l'organisation et les affinities du Jackia. Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 1: 185-188.
12. Bremer, B. 1984. The genus Steenisia (Rubiaceae) and its taxonomic position. Nord. J. Bot. 4: 333-345.
13. Bremer, B., Andreasen, K. & Olsson, D. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 383-397.
14. Bremer, B., Bremer, K., Heidari, N., Erixon, P., Olmstead, R.G., Anderberg, A., Källersjö, M. & Barkhordarian, E. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast
15. DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 24: 274-301.
16. Bremer, B. & Eriksson, T. 2009. Time tree of Rubiaceae: Phylogeny and dating of the family, subfamilies, and tribes. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 170: 766-793.
17. Bremer, B., Jansen, R.K., Oxelman, B., Backlund, M., Lantz, H. & Kim, K.J. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 48: 413-435.
18. Bremer, B. & Thulin, M. 1998. Collapse of Isertieae, re-establishment of Mussaendeae, and a new genus of Sabiceeae (Rubiaceae); phylogenetic relationships based on rbcL data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 211: 71-92.
19. Chan, H.T., Ong, J.E., Gong, W.K. & Sasekumar, A. 1993. The socioeconomic, ecological and environmental values of mangrove ecosystems in Malaysia and their present state of conservation. Pp. 41-81 in: Clough, B.F. (ed.), The economic and environmental values of mangrove forests and their present state of conservation in South-East Asia/Pacific region. Mangrove Ecosystems Technical Reports, No. 1, ITTO/ISME/JIAM Project PD71/89, Rev. 1 (F). Nishihara, Japan: International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems (ISME), International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), Japan International Association for Mangroves (JIAM).
20. Cortés-B. R. Delprete R.P.G. & Motley T. 2009. Phylogenetic placement of the tribe Retiniphylleae among the subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 61-67.
21. Davis, A.P., Govaerts, R. Bridson, D.M., Rushsam M. Moat J. & Brummitt N.A. 2009. A global assessment of distribution, diversity, endemism, and taxonomic effort in the Rubiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 68-78.
22. Delprete, R.P.G. 1998. Notes on calycophyllous Rubiaceae. Part III. Systematic position of the monotypic Mexican genus Cosmocalyx and notes on the calycophyll development. Brittonia 50: 309-317.
23. Delprete, R.P.G. & Cortes-B. R. 2004. A phylogenetic study of the tribe Sipaneeae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae), using trnL-F and ITS sequence data. Taxon 53: 347-356.
24. DENR. 1996. The Philippine Environmental Quality Report, 1990-1995. Quezon: Environmental Management Bureau, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
25. Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y., Rawlence, W.N. & Rambaut, A. 2007. A rough guide to BEAST 1.4. http://molecularevolution.org/molevolfiles/beast/BEAST14_MANUAL-7-6-07.pdf.
26. Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. 7: 457-511.
27. Gignoux, J., Clobert, J. & Menaut, J.C. 1997. Alternative fire resistance strategies in savanna trees. Oecologia 110: 576-583.
28. Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Sér. 41: 95-98.
29. Hemsley, W.B. 1916. Flora of Seychelles and Aldabra. J. Bot. 54[Suppl. 2]: 1-24.
30. Hettiarachchi, P.L. & Jayaratne, R.K. 2006. Factors limiting seed germination in Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea Gaertn f. and Pemphis acidula J R & Forst [sic]. http://forestry2002.blogspot.com/2006/09/factors-limiting-seed-germination-in.html.
31. Hooker, J.D. 1873. Ordo LXXXIV. Rubiaceae. Pp. 7-151 in: Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. (eds.), Genera plantarum, vol. 2, part 1. London: Reeve; Williams & Norgate.
32. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
33. IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, version 3.1. IUCN Cambridge: Species Survival Commission.
34. IUCN. 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, version 2010.4. www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 4 Feb. 2011).
35. Jomo, K.S., Chang, Y.T. & Khoo, K.J. 2004. Deforesting Malaysia: The political economy and social ecology of agricultural expansion and commercial logging. London: Zed Books.
36. Khan, S., Razafimandimbison, S.G., Bremer, B. & Liede-Schumann, S. 2008. Sabiceeae and Virectarieae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae): One or two tribes? - New tribal and generic circumscriptions of Sabiceeae and biogeography of Sabicea s.l. Taxon 57: 7-23.
37. Kainulainen, K., Mouly, A., Khodabandeh, A. & Bremer, B. 2009. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Alberteae (Rubiaceae), with description of a new genus Razafimandimbisonia. Taxon 58: 757-768.
38. Kathirithamby-Wells, J. 2005. Nature and nation: Forests and development in Peninsular Malaysia. Singapore: NIAS Press.
39. Kishokumar, J. 2008. Integrated management plan of the South-East Pahang Peat Swamp Forest. PSF Technical Series, No. 9. UNDP/GEF Peat Swamp Forest Project, Pahang Forestry Dept., Malaysia.
40. Korthals, P.W. 1851. Overzigt der Rubiaceën van de Nederlandsch- Oostindische Kolonien. Ned. Kruidk. Arch. 2: 196-198.
41. Lantz, H. & Bremer, B. 2004. Phylogeny inferred from morphology and DNA data: Characterizing well-supported groups in Vanguerieae (Rubiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 257-283.
42. Malcomber, S.T. & Davis, A.P. 2005. Six new species of Gaertnera (Rubiaceae) from Madagascar and phylogenetic analyses that support Hymenocnemis as a synonym of Gaertnera. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 104: 371-398.
43. Manns, U. & Bremer, B. 2010. Towards a better understanding of intertribal relationships and stable tribal delimitations within Cinchonoideae s.s. (Rubiaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 56: 21-39.
44. Mouly, A., Razafimandimbison, S.G., Achille, F., Haevermans, T. & Bremer, B. 2007. Phylogenetic placement of Rhopalobrachium fragrans (Rubiaceae): Evidence from molecular (rps16 and trnT-F) and morphological data. Syst. Bot. 32: 872-882.
45. Mouly, A., Razafimandimbison, S.G., Florence, J., Jérémie, J. & Bremer, B. 2009. Paraphyly of Ixora and new tribal delimitation of Ixoreae (Rubiaceae): Inference from combined chloroplast (rps16, rbcL, and trnT-F) sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 146-160.
46. Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S.E., Weiblen, G.D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L. & Drozd, P. 2002. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416: 841-844.
47. Nylander, J.A.A., Wilgenbusch, J.C., Warren, D.L. & Swofford, D.L. 2008. AWTY (Are We There Yet?): A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24: 581-583.
48. Oxelman, B., Backlund, M. & Bremer, B. 1999. Relationships of the Buddlejaceae s.l. investigated using parsimony jackknife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24: 164-182.
49. Primavera, J. 2000. Development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: Institutional issues. Ecol. Econ. 35: 91-106.
50. Puff, C., Chayamarit, C. & Chamchumroon, V. 2007. Rubiaceae of Thailand: A pictorial guide to indigenous and cultivated genera. Bangkok: The Forest Herbarium, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Conservation.
51. Puff, C. & Igersheim, A. 1994. Intra-ovarian trichomes in Jackiopsis ornata (Wallich) Risdale (Rubiaceae-Jackieae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 115: 29-33.
52. Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. 2007. Tracer, version 1.4. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
53. Rana, T.S. & Ranade, S.A. 2009. The enigma of monotypic taxa and their taxonomic implications. Curr. Sci. 96: 219-229.
54. Ranarivelo-Randriamboavonjy, T., Robbrecht, E., Rabakonandrianina, E. & De Block, P. 2007. Revision of the Malagasy species of the genus Tricalysia (Rubiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 155: 83-126.
55. Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Bremer, B. 2001 [publ. 2002]. Tribal delimitation of Naucleeae (Cinchonoideae, Rubiaceae) inference from molecular and morphological data. Syst. Geogr. Pl. 71: 515-538.
56. Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Bremer, B. 2002. Phylogeny and classification of Naucleeae s. l. (Rubiaceae) inferred from molecular (ITS, rbcL, and trnT-F) and morphological data. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1027-1041.
57. Razafimandimbison, S.G., Lantz, H., Mouly, A. & Bremer, B. 2009. Evolutionary trends, major lineages, new generic limits in the dioecious group of the tribe Vanguerieae (Rubiaceae) insights into the evolution of functional dioecy. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 161-181.
58. Razafimandimbison, S.G., Rydin, C. & Bremer, B. 2008. Evolution and trends in the Psychotrieae alliance (Rubiaceae): A rarely reported evolutionary change of many-seeded carpels from oneseeded carpels. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 48: 207-223.
59. Ridsdale, C. 1979. Jackiopsis, a new name for Jackia Wall. (Rubiaceae - Jackieae). Blumea 25: 295-296.
60. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belg. 1: 1-271.
61. Robbrecht, E. & Manen, J-F. 2006. The major evolutionary lineages of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, angiosperms). Combined analysis (nDNA and cpDNA) to infer the position of Coptosapelta and Luculia, and supertree construction based on rbcL, rps16, trnL-F and atpB-rbcL data. Syst. Geogr. Pl. 76: 85-146.
62. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
63. Rova, J.H.E., Delprete, R.P.G., Andersson, L. & Albert, V. 2002. A trnL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condamineeae-Rondeletieae- Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 145-159.
64. Rova, J.H.E., Delprete, R.P.G. & Bremer, B. 2009. The Rondeletia complex: An attempt to use ITS, rps16, and trnL-F sequence data to delimit Guettardeae, Rondeletieae, and sections within Rondeletia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 182-193.
65. Roxburgh, W. 1824. Flora Indica. Calcutta: Mission Press.
66. Rydin, C., Kainulainen, K., Razafimandimbison, S.G., Smedmark, J.E.E. & Bremer, B. 2009. Deep divergences in the coffee family and systematic position of Acranthera. Pl. Syst. Evol. 278: 101-123.
67. Rydin, C., Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Bremer, B. 2008. Rare and enigmatic genera (Dunnia, Schizocolea, and Colletoecema), sisters to species-rich clades: Phylogeny and aspects of conservation biology in the coffee family. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 48: 74-83.
68. Samson, N., Bausher, M.G., Lee, S.-B., Jansen, R.K. & Daniell, H. 2007. The complete nucleotide sequence of the coffee (Coffea arabica L.) chloroplast genome: Organization and implications for biotechnology and phylogenetic relationships among angiosperms. Pl. Biotechnol. J. 5: 339-353.
69. Sasekumar, A. & Then, A.Y.H. 2005. Vegetation, forestry and conservation of Selangor mangrove forests. Pp. 57-65 in: Sasekumar, A. & Chong, V.C. (eds.), Ecology of Klang Strait. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaysia.
70. Schumann, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pp. 1-156 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4, 4: 1. Leipzig: Engelmann.
71. Smith, W.W. 1917. Diagnoses specierum novarum in herbario Horti Regii Botanici Edinburgensis cognitarum (species asiaticae). CCLI-CCCL. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 10: 1-78.
72. Sosef, M.S., Prawirohatmodjo, M.S. & Hong, L.T. 1998. Plant resources of South-East Asia, vol. 5 no. 3, Timber trees: Lesserknown timbers. Leiden: Backhuys.
73. Stoffelen, P., Robbrecht, E. & Smets, E. 1996. A revision of Corynanthe and Pausinystalia (African Rubiaceae-Coptosapelteae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 120: 287-326.
74. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
75. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
76. Tirvengadum, D.D. 1984. Glionnetia, un nouveau genre de Rubiacées (Rondélétiées) des Seychelles. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia 6: 197-205.
77. Tomlinson, P.H. 1986. The botany of mangroves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Tosh, J., Davis, A.P., Dessein, S., De Block, P., Huysmans, S., Fay, M.F., Smets, E. & Robbrecht, E. 2009. Phylogeny of Tricalysia (Rubiaceae) and its relationships with allied genera based on based plastid DNA data: Resurrection of the genus Empogona. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 194-213.
79. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. 2008. Strategies for the sustainable use and management of timber species subject to international trade; South East Asia. Cambridge, U.K.: UNEPWCMC.
80. Villaluz, D.K. 1953. Fish farming in the Philippines. Manila: Bookman.
81. Xiao, L.-Q. & Zhu, H. 2007. Paraphyly and phylogenetic relationships in Lasianthus (Rubiaceae) inferred from chloroplast rps16 data. Bot. Stud. 48: 225-232.