Phylogeny of tricalysia (rubiaceae) and its relationships with allied genera based on plastid dna data: Resurrection of the genus empogona

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 194-213

  Tosh, James ^a   Davis, Aaron P ^b   Dessein, Steven ^c   Block, Petra De ^c   Huysmans, Suzy ^a   Fay, Mike F ^b   Smets, Erik ^a,d   Robbrecht, Elmar ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c BOTANIC GARDEN MEISE   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN BRANCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accd psal; Coffea; Coffee; Coffeeae; Empogona; Molecular systematics; PetD; Rpl16; Rubiaceae; Tricalysia; TrnL F

Indexed keywords

BELONOPHORA; CALYCOSIPHONIA; COFFEA; COFFEEAE; DIPLOSPORA; RUBIACEAE; TRICALYSIA;

EID: 65949111064     PISSN: 00266493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3417/2006202     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Ali, S. J. & E. Robbrecht. 1991. Remarks on the tropical Asian and Australian taxa included in Diplospora or Tricalysia (Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae-Gardenieae). Blumea 35: 279-305.
2. Andreasen, K. & B. Bremer. 2000. Combined phylogenetic analysis in the Rubiaceae-Ixorideae: Morphology, nuclear and chloroplast DNA data. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1731-1748.
3. Brenan, J. P. M. 1947. Empogona Hook. f. and its relation to Tricalysia DC. Kew Bull. 1947: 53-63.
4. Bridson, D. M. & B. Verdcourt. 2003. Rubiaceae. Pp. 379-720 in G. V. Pope (editor), Flora Zambesiaca, Vol. 5(3). Royal Bolanic Gardens, Kew.
5. Cheek, M. & S. Dawson. 2000. A synoptic revision of Belonophora (Rubiaceae). Kew Bull. 55: 63-80.
6. Davis, A. P., M. Chester, O. Maurin & M. Fay. 2007. Searching for the relatives of Coffea (Rubiaceae, Ixo-raoideae): The circumscription and phylogeny of Coffeeae based on plastid sequence data and morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 313-329.
7. Doyle, J. J. & J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
8. Erixon, P., B. Svennblad, T. Britton & B. Oxelman. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and boolstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 52: 665-673.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative melhod. Amer. Naturalist 125: 1-15
10. Hooker, J. D. 1873. Rubiaceae. Pp. 7-151 in G. Bentham & J. D. Hooker (editors), Genera Plantarum, Vol. 2(1). Lovell Reeve & Co., London.
11. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES. Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
12. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Largel, R. E. Miller & F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51: 673-688.
13. Jordan, W. C, M. W. Courtney & J. E. Neigel. 1996. Low levels of interspecific genetic variation at a rapidly evolving chloroplast DNA locus in North American duckweed (Lemnaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 430-439.
14. Keay, R. W. J. 1958. Notes on Rubiaceae for the Flora of West Tropical Africa, 2nd ed. Bull. Jard. Bot. Etat. 28: 297-298.
15. Lohne, C. & T. Borsch. 2005. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the petD group II intron: A case study in basal angiosperms. Molec. Biol. Evol. 22: 317-332.
16. Maddison, D. R. & W. P. Maddison. 2002. MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.01. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
17. Mendenhall, M. 1994. Phylogeny of Baptista and Thermopsis (Leguminosae) as Inferred from Chloroplast DNA and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Sequences, Secondary Chemistry, and Morphology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University oi Texas, Austin.
18. Persson, C. 2000. Phylogeny of Gardenieae (Rubiaceae) based on chloroplast DNA sequences from the rps16 intron and trnL(UAA)- F(GAA) intergenic spacer. Nord. J. Bot. 20: 257-270.
19. Posada, D. & K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modellesl: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformalics 14: 817-818.
20. Ranarivelo-Randriamboavonjy, T., E. Robbrecht, E. Raba-konandrianina & P. De Block. 2007. Revision of the Malagasy species of the genus Tricalysia (Rubiaceae). Bol. J. Linn. Soc. 155: 83-126.
21. Randle, C. P., M. E. Mort & D. J. Crawford. 2005. Bayesian inference of phylogenetics revisited: Developments and concerns. Taxon 54: 9-15.
22. Robbrecht, E. 1978. Sericanthe, a new African genus of Rubiaceae (Coffeeae). Bull. Jard. Bol. Natl. Belg. 48: 3-78.
23. Robbrecht, E. 1979. The African genus Tricalysia A. Rich. (Rubiaceae-Coffeeae). 1. A revision of the species of subgenus Empogona. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 49: 239-360.
24. Robbrecht, E. 1982. The African genus Tricalysia A. Rich. (Rubiaceae-Coffeeae). 2. Ephedranthera, a new section of subgenus Tricalysia. Bull. Jard. Bol. Natl. Belg. 52: 311-339.
25. Robbrecht, E. 1983. The African genus Tricalysia A. Rich. (Rubiaceae). 3. Probletostemon revived as a section of subgenus Tricalysia. Bull. Jard. Bol. Natl. Belg. 53: 299-320.
26. Robbrecht, E. 1987. The African genus Tricalysia A. Rich. (Rubiaceae). 4. A revision of the species of section Tricalysia and section Rosea. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 57: 39-208.
27. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bol. Belg. 1: 1-271.
28. Robbrecht, E. & C. Puff. 1986. A survey of the Gardenieae and related tribes (Rubiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108: 63-137.
29. Robbrecht, E. & J.-F. Manen. 2006. The major evolutionary lineages of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, angiosperms). Combined analysis (nDNA and cpDNA) to infer the position of Coptosapelta and Luculia, and supertree construction based on rbcL, rps16, irnL-trnF and aptB-rbcL data. A new classification in two subfamilies, Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. Syst. & Geogr. Pl. 76: 85-146.
30. Ronquist, F., J. P. Huelsenbeck & P. van der Mark. 2005. MrBayes 3.1 manual. , accessed 30 October 2008.
31. Schumann, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pp. 1-156 in A. Engler & K. Prantl (editors), Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 4 (4). Wilhelm Engelmann Verlag, Leipzig.
32. Shaw, J., E. B. Licky, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling & R. L. Small. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phyloge-netic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142-166.
33. Simmons, M. P. & H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
34. Stace, C. A. 1991. Plant Taxonomy and Biosystemalics, 2nd ed. Edward Arnold, London.
35. Staden, R., K. Beal & J. Bonfield. 1998. The Staden Package. Pp. 115-130 in S. Miseners & S. Krawetz (editors), Computer Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, New York.
36. * and other methods). Sinnauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou & J. Bovet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1005-1109.