Where Law and Morality Meet

Where Law and Morality Meet

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-310

  Kramer, Matthew H ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Churchill College   (United Kingdom)

^c Cambridge Forum for Legal and Political Philosophy ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Excuses; Jurisprudence; Justifications; Legal philosophy; Legal positivism; Natural law; Rule of law

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052099208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546138.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (123)

1. Scott Shapiro, 'On Hart's Way Out', 4 Legal Theory 469 (1998)
2. Scott Shapiro, 'The Difference that Rules Make', in Brian Bix (ed.), Analyzing Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), 33, 56-61;
3. Brian Leiter, 'Realism, Hard Positivism, and Conceptual Analysis', 4 Legal Theory 533 (1998);
4. Michael Giudice, 'Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges', 15 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 69 (2002).
5. H.L.A. Hart, Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), chap. 10.
6. Joseph Raz, Practical Reason and Norms (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990) (2nd edn), 40.
7. Leslie Green, The Authority of the State (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), 39.
8. Jules Coleman, 'Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis', 4 Legal Theory 406-7 (1998)
9. David Lyons, 'Principles, Positivism, and Legal Theory', 87 Yale Law Journal 423-6 (1977).
10. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), 112-13
11. Philip Soper, 'Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute', 75 Michigan Law Review 473, (1977)
12. Philip Soper, The Ethics of Deference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 93-4.
13. Brian Bix, 'Patrolling the Boundaries: Inclusive Legal Positivism and the Nature of Jurisprudential Debate', 12 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 17, (1999).
14. Stephen Perry, 'The Varieties of Legal Positivism', 9 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 375-80 (1996);
15. A.W.B. Simpson, 'The Common Law and Legal Theory', in A.W.B. Simpson (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Second Series (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), 80-7.
16. Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire (London: Fontana, 1986), 15-30.
17. David Lyons, 'Moral Aspects of Legal Theory', in Moral Aspects of Legal Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 64
18. Scott Shapiro, 'The Difference that Rules Make', in Brian Bix (ed.), Analyzing Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 33
19. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978), chaps 2-4.
20. Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire (London: Fontana Press, 1986), 15-30.
21. Nigel Simmonds, 'Imperial Visions and Mundane Practices', 46 Cambridge Law Journal 479-80 (1987).
22. Lon L. Fuller, The Morality of Law', in Essays, supra, at 343
23. 'Postscript', to The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)
24. 'Coming to Grips with the Law: In Defense of Positive Legal Positivism', 5 Legal Theory 190-200 (1999).
25. W.J. Waluchow, Inclusive Legal Positivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
26. 'Principles, Positivism, and Legal Theory', 87 Yale Law Journal 423-6 (1977).
27. W.J. Waluchow, 'Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defense of Inclusive Legal Positivism', 6 Legal Theory 45 (2000).
28. 'Constraints on the Criteria of Legality', 6 Legal Theory 171 (2000);
29. 'Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis', 4 Legal Theory 381 (1998);
30. 'Second Thoughts and Other First Impressions', in Brian Bix (ed.), Analyzing Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), 257, 258-78;
31. 'Authority and Reason', in Robert George (ed.), The Autonomy of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 287;
32. 'Negative and Positive Positivism', in Markets, Morals, and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 3.
33. 'Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute', 75 Michigan Law Review 509-15 (1977).
34. Coleman, Practice, 67 n.3, 105
35. Ronald Dworkin, 'Thirty Years On', 115 Harvard Law Review 1655 (2002).
36. David Dyzenhaus, 'Positivism's Stagnant Research Programme', 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 703 (2000)
37. Hart, 'American Jurisprudence', in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), 123.
38. Jules Coleman, 'Constraints on the Criteria of Legality', 6 Legal Theory 171 (2000)
39. Kenneth Winston, 'Three Models for the Study of Law', in Willem Witteveen and Wibren van der Burg (eds), Rediscovering Fuller (Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press, 1999), 51, 69.
40. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961)
41. Joseph Raz, 'Dworkin: A New Link in the Chain', 74 California Law Review 1107 (1986)
42. Kent Greenawalt, 'The Rule of Recognition and the Constitution', 85 Michigan Law Review 654-8 (1987).
43. Joseph Raz, 'Dworkin: A New Link in the Chain', 74 California Law Review 1107 (1986)
44. W.J. Waluchow, Inclusive Legal Positivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), 186-8.
45. N.E. Simmonds, Central Issues in Jurisprudence (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002) (2nd edn), 249-53.
46. Patrick Capps, 'Being Positive about Positivism', 63 Modern Law Review 783-4 (2000).
47. H.L.A. Hart, 'Legal Duty and Obligation', in Essays on Bentham (Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1982)
48. Michael Moore, 'Hart's Concluding Scientific Postscript', 4 Legal Theory 308-10 (1998).
49. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961)
50. Ruth Barcan Marcus, 'More about Moral Dilemmas', in H.E. Mason, Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)
51. J.L. Austin, 'A Plea for Excuses', 57 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2-3 (1956-7)
52. Peter Cane, Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002)
53. Joshua Dressler, 'New Thoughts about the Concept of Justification in the Criminal Law: A Critique of Fletcher's Thinking and Rethinking', 32 UCLA Law Review 66-8 (1984);
54. Kent Greenawalt, 'The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse', 84 Columbia Law Review 1899-900 (1984)
55. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Moral Dilemmas (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988)
56. Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1978)
57. 'Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape?' 26 UCLA Law Review 1355 (1979)
58. 'The Right and the Reasonable', 98 Harvard Law Review 977-8 (1985)
59. A.P. Simester and G.R. Sullivan, Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), 537-40.
60. Matthew H. Kramer, 'Getting Rights Right', in Rights, Wrongs, and Responsibilities (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001)
61. Judith Jarvis Thomson, The Realm of Rights (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1990)
62. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, 'Moral Dilemmas and Rights', in Mason, Dilemmas
63. Terrance McConnell, 'Moral Residue and Dilemmas', in Mason, Dilemmas
64. W.V.H. Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002)
65. Philippa Foot, 'Moral Realism and Moral Dilemma', 80 Journal of Philosophy 387 (1983)
66. Mary Mothersill, 'The Moral Dilemmas Debate', in Mason, Dilemmas
67. Karl Llewellyn, 'Some Realism about Realism-Responding to Dean Pound', 44 Harvard Law Review 1244 (1931).
68. Jules Coleman, The Practice of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 47-8.
69. Judith Jarvis Thomson, Rights, Restitution, and Risk (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1986)
70. Joel Feinberg, Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980)
71. George Fletcher, 'The Nature of Justification', in Stephen Shute, John Gardner, and Jeremy Horder (eds), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), 177;
72. Robert Audi, 'Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics', in Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Mark Timmons (eds), Moral Knowledge? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 103-6;
73. Jonathan Dancy, Moral Reasons (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), chap. 6;
74. Alan Donagan, 'Moral Dilemmas, Genuine and Spurious: A Comparative Anatomy', in Mason, Dilemmas, 18-21;
75. Joel Feinberg, 'Supererogation and Rules', in Doing and Deserving (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), 3, 8-9;
76. J.N. Findlay, Values and Intentions (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1961), 336-8;
77. William Frankena, Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973) (2nd edn), 26-7
78. W.D. Hudson, Modern Moral Philosophy (Basingstoke:Macmillan, 1983) (2nd edn), 95-6;
79. S.L. Hurley, Natural Reasons (Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1989)
80. Peter Jones, Rights (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994), 195-8;
81. David McNaughton and Piers Rawling, 'Unprincipled Ethics', in Brad Hooker and Margaret Little (eds), Moral Particularism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 256, 266-71;
82. A.I. Melden, Rights and Persons (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1977), 4-16;
83. Frederick Schauer, Playing by the Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 113-14;
84. W.J. Waluchow, The Dimensions of Ethics (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2003), chap. 8;
85. Bernard Williams, Problems of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), 176;
86. Lon Fuller, The Morality of Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969)
87. H.L.A. Hart, 'Lon L. Fuller: The Morality of Law', in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), 343, 360.
88. Kent Greenawalt, 'The Rule of Recognition and the Constitution', 85 Michigan Law Review 635-6 (1987)
89. N.E. Simmonds, 'Rights at the Cutting Edge', in Matthew H. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, and Hillel Steiner, A Debate over Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 113, 220.
90. Matthew H. Kramer, 'Getting Rights Right', in Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), Rights, Wrongs, and Responsibilities (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), 28, 65-78.
91. Michael Giudice, 'Unconstitutionality, Invalidity, and Charter Challenges', 15 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 69 (2002).
92. Andrei Marmor, Positive Law and Objective Values (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
93. Jules Coleman, The Practice of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
94. Jules Coleman, 'Authority and Reason', in Robert George (ed.), The Autonomy of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 287, 307-8.
95. Jules Coleman, 'Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis', 4 Legal Theory 381, (1998).
96. Eleni Mitrophanous, 'Soft Positivism', 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 627-9 (1997)
97. Ronald Dworkin, 'Thirty Years On', 115 Harvard Law Review 1675 (2002).
98. Raz, Ethics, 316-17.
99. Joseph Raz, 'On the Nature of Law', 82 Archiv für Rechtsund Sozialphilosophie 19 (1996).
100. Tom Campbell, The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism (Aldershot: Dartmouth Publis
101. Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)
102. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), 112-14.
103. Wil Waluchow, 'In Pursuit of Pragmatic Legal Theory', 15 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 148-9 (2002).
104. Charles Dickens, The Old Curiosity Shop (London: Everyman, 1995) (Paul Schlicke ed.), 231.
105. N.E. Simmonds, 'Rights at the Cutting Edge', in Matthew H. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, and Hillel Steiner, A Debate over Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 113, 146-95.
106. Philip Soper, The Ethics of Deference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)
107. Joseph Raz, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 27
108. John Gardner, 'Legal Positivism: 51/2 Myths', 46 American Journal of Jurisprudence 223 (2001)
109. Joseph Raz, 'About Morality and the Nature of Law', 48 American Journal of Jurisprudence 2-3 (2003)
110. H.L.A. Hart, 'Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals', in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)
111. H.L.A. Hart, 'Introduction', in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)
112. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961)
113. Jules Coleman, The Practice of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
114. Kenneth Einar Himma, 'Law's Claim of Legitimate Authority', in Jules Coleman (ed.), Hart's Postscript (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 271.
115. Joseph Raz, Practical Reason and Norms (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990)
116. Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), 38-9.
117. Joseph Raz, 'On the Nature of Law', 82 Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie 1, (1996).
118. Scott Shapiro, 'Law, Morality, and the Guidance of Conduct', 6 Legal Theory 127 (2000)
119. Jules Coleman, 'Constraints on the Criteria of Legality', 6 Legal Theory 171 (2000)
120. Scott Shapiro, 'On Hart's Way Out', 4 Legal Theory 502 (1998)
121. H.L.A. Hart, 'Postscript', to The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994) (2nd edn), 238
122. Jules Coleman and Brian Leiter, 'Legal Positivism', in Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), 241, 251.
123. Ronald Dworkin, 'Objectivity and Truth: You'd Better Believe It', 25 Philosophy & Public Affairs 87 (1996).