Patrolling the boundaries: Inclusive legal positivism and the nature of jurisprudential debate

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 17-33

  Bix, Brian ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347613405     PISSN: 08418209     EISSN: 20564260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0841820900002125     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. F. Schauer, "Positivism Through Thick and Thin" in B. Bix, ed., Analyzing Law: New Essays in Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) 65 at 69.
2. D. Lyons, "Principles, Positivism and Legal Theory" (1977) 87 Yale L. J. 415.
3. P. Soper, "Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute" (1977) 75 Mich. L. Rev. 473.
4. J.L. Coleman, "Negative and Positive Positivism" (1982) 11 J. Legal Stud. 139.
5. Markets, Morals and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) 3.
6. W. J. Waluchow, Inclusive Legal Positivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
7. H. L. A. Hart, "Postscript" in P.A. Bulloch & J. Raz, eds., The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994) 238 at 250-54.
8. J. Raz, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) at 37-77.
9. J. Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994) at 210-19, 287-92.
10. S.J. Shapiro, "The Difference That Rules Make" in B. Bix, 1 at 56-62.
11. S.J. Shapiro, "On Hart's Way Out" (1998) 4 Legal Theory 469.
12. F. Schauer, "Critical Notice: R. Shiner, Norm and Nature" (1994) 24 Can. J. Phil. 495.
13. Brian Bix, "Conceptual Questions and Jurisprudence" (1995) 1 Legal Theory 465.
14. Brian Bix, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context (London: Sweet & Maxwell; Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996).
15. G.C. Christie & P.H. Martin, eds., Jurisprudence: Text and Readings on the Philosophy of Law 2nd ed. (St. Paul, MN: West, 1995) at 392-724.
16. B. Bix, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context, 5 at 35-65.
17. J.L. Coleman & B. Leiter, "Legal Positivism" in D. Patterson, ed., A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996) at 241-60.
18. Brian Bix, "Natural Law Theory" in D. Patterson, ibid. 223 at 227-28.
19. John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined ed. by W.E. Rumble (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
20. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).
21. S. Perry, "Interpretation and Methodology in Legal Theory" in A. Marmor, ed., Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995) 97.
22. Brian Bix, "H.L.A. Hart and the Hermeneutic Turn in Legal Theory" (1999) 52 SMU L. Rev. 167.
23. Thomas Morawetz, "Law as Experience: Theory and the Internal Aspect of Law" (1999) 52 SMU L. Rev. 27.
24. J.L. Coleman, "Incorporationism, Conventionality, and The Practical Difference Thesis" (1998) 4 Legal Theory 381.
25. Shapiro, "The Difference That Rules Make, " 59-6.
26. J. L. Coleman, "Authority and Reason" in R. George, ed., The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996) 287 at 291.
27. S.R. Perry, "The Varieties of Legal Positivism" (1996) 9 Can. J. L. & Juris. 361 at 361-62.
28. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, rev. ed. (London: Duckworth, 1977) at 14-80.
29. H.L.A. Hart, Law, Liberty, and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963) at 17-2.
30. Bix, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context, 5 at 136-37.
31. J. Raz, "Legal Principles and the Limits of Law" in M. Cohen, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1984).
32. Ronald Dworkin, "A Reply by Ronald Dworkin" in M. Cohen, ibid, at 260-63.
33. S. R. Perry, "Judicial Obligation, Precedent and the Common Law" (1987) 7 Oxford J. Legal Stud. 215.
34. S. R. Perry, "Second-Order Reasons, Uncertainty and Legal Theory" (1989) 61 S. Cal. L. Rev. 913.
35. Frederick Schauer, "Is the Common Law Law?" (1989) 77 Cal. L. Rev. 455.
36. B. Bix, Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) at 84-88.
37. F. Schauer, "Rules and the Rule of Law" (1991) 14 Harv. J. L. & Publ. Policy 645 at 666-67 n.41.
38. F. Schauer, Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991) at 197-99.
39. J. L. Coleman, "Rules and Social Facts" (1991) 14 Harv. J. L. & Publ. Policy 703.
40. H.L.A. Hart, "Comment" in R. Gavison, ed., Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987) at 36-37.
41. A. A. Leff, "Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism About Nominalism" (1974) 60 Virginia L. Rev. 451 at 469-77.
42. R. Shiner, Norm and Nature: The Movements of Legal Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).
43. John Finnis, "The Truth in Legal Positivism" in R. George, 15 at 203-05.
44. Shapiro "The Difference That Rules Make, " 3 at 56-6.
45. A. Marmor, "An Essay on the Objectivity of Law" in B. Bix, 1 at 14.
46. R. Dworkin, Law's Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986) at 255-56.
47. N. Kretzmann, "Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex: Laws on Trial in Aquinas' Court of Conscience" (1988) 33 Am. J. Juris. 99.
48. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, in R.J. Henle, ed. & trans., The Treatise of Law (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 199.
49. John Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980) at 359-62.
50. P. Soper, "Some Natural Confusions About Natural Law" (1992) 90 Mich. L. Rev. 2393 at 2413.
51. R. A. Posner, Law and Legal Theory in the UK and the US (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996) at 1-10.
52. A. J. Sebok, Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
53. F. Schauer, "Fuller's Internal Point of View" (1994) 13 L. & Phil. 285 at 289-94.
54. H.L.A. Hart, "Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals" (1958) 71 Harv. L. Rev. 593 at 615-21.
55. S. L. Paulson, "Lon L. Fuller, Gustav Radbruch, and the 'Positivist' Theses" (1994) 13 L. & Phil. 313.
56. F. Schauer, "Instrumental Commensurabihty" (1998) 146 U. Perm. L. Rev. 121.