The precision of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: The effect of sampling frequency and duration

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 5665-5678

  Aerts, Hugo J W L ^a   Jaspers, K ^b   Backes, Walter H ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION; DCE-MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EARLY EVALUATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATE; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; SAMPLING FREQUENCIES; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION THEORY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHARMACOKINETICS; RESONANCE;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80052042405     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/17/013     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aerts H J, van Riel N A and Backes W H 2008 System identification theory in pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: influence of contrast injection Magn. Reson. Med. 59 1111-9 (Pubitemid 351590525)
2. Buckley D L 2002 Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 47 601-6 (Pubitemid 34194016)
3. Calamante F and Connelly A 2009 Perfusion precision in bolus-tracking MRI: Estimation using the wild-bootstrap method Magn. Reson. Med. 61 696-704
4. de Lussanet Q G, Backes W H, Griffioen A W, Padhani A R, Baeten C I, van Baardwijk A, Lambin P, Beets G L, van Engelshoven J M and Beets-Tan R G 2005a Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of radiation therapy-induced microcirculation changes in rectal cancer Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 63 1309-15 (Pubitemid 41628023)
5. de Lussanet Q G, Langereis S, Beets-Tan R G, van Genderen M H, Griffioen A W, van Engelshoven J M and Backes W H 2005b Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging kinetic parameters and molecular weight of dendritic contrast agents in tumor angiogenesis in mice Radiology 235 65-72 (Pubitemid 40432238)
6. Di Giovanni P et al 2011 Use of a capillary input function with cardiac output for the estimation of lesion pharmacokinetic parameters: preliminary results on a breast cancer patient Phys. Med. Biol. 56 1743-53
7. Girod B, Rabenstein R and Stenger A 2001 Signals and Systems (New York: Wiley)
8. Goh V, Padhani A R and Rasheed S 2007 Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis Lancet Oncol. 8 245-55 (Pubitemid 46291714)
9. Henderson E, Rutt B K and Lee T Y 1998 Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease Magn. Reson. Imaging 16 1057-73 (Pubitemid 29196842)
10. Henderson E, Sykes J, Drost D, Weinmann H J, Rutt B K and Lee T Y 2000 Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12 991-1003
11. Jackson A, Buckley D L and Parker G J M 2005 Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology (Berlin: Springer)
12. Jaspers K, Aerts H J, Leiner T, Oostendorp M, van Riel N A, Post M J and Backes W H 2009 Reliability of pharmacokinetic parameters: small versus medium-sized contrast agents Magn. Reson. Med. 62 779-87
13. Kety S S 1951 The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues Pharmacol. Rev. 3 1-41
14. Lopata R G, Backes W H, van den Bosch P P and van Riel N A 2007 On the identifiability of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 58 425-9 (Pubitemid 47267663)
15. McDonald D M and Choyke P L 2003 Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic Nat. Med. 9 713-25 (Pubitemid 36749220)
16. O'Connor J P, Jackson A, Asselin M C, Buckley D L, Parker G J and Jayson G C 2008 Quantitative imaging biomarkers in the clinical development of targeted therapeutics: current and future perspectives Lancet Oncol. 9 766-76 (Pubitemid 352038315)
17. Padhani A R 2002 Functional MRI for anticancer therapy assessment Eur. J. Cancer 38 2116-27 (Pubitemid 35223249)
18. Parker G J, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi G A, Cheung S, Buckley D L, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K and Jayson G C 2006 Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 56 993-1000 (Pubitemid 44691341)
19. Port R E, Knopp M V and Brix G 2001 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-DTPA: interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors Magn. Reson. Med. 45 1030-8
20. Roberts C, Buckley D L and Parker G J 2006 Comparison of errors associated with single- and multi-bolus injection protocols in low-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced tracer kinetic analysis Magn. Reson. Med. 56 611-9 (Pubitemid 44338880)
21. Rudisch A, Kremser C, Judmaier W, Zunterer H and DeVries A F 2005 Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a non-invasive method to evaluate significant differences between malignant and normal tissue Eur. J. Radiol. 53 514-9 (Pubitemid 40312144)
22. Tofts P S 1997 Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 91-101 (Pubitemid 28365643)
23. Tofts P S et al 1999 Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 223-32 (Pubitemid 29463104)
24. Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk M, Mann R, Huisman H J, Barentsz J O, Blickman J G and Boetes C 2008 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions Eur. Radiol. 18 1123-33
25. Whitcher B, Tuch D S, Wisco J J, Sorensen A G and Wang L 2008 Using the wild bootstrap to quantify uncertainty in diffusion tensor imaging Hum. Brain Mapp. 29 365-2 (Pubitemid 351374393)
26. Zahra M A, Hollingsworth K G, Sala E, Lomas D J and Tan L T 2007 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of tumour response to radiotherapy Lancet Oncol. 8 63-74 (Pubitemid 44943092)
27. Zhu T, Liu X, Connelly P R and Zhong J 2008 An optimized wild bootstrap method for evaluation of measurement uncertainties of DTI-derived parameters in human brain Neuroimage 40 1144-56
28. Zhu T, Liu X, Gaugh M, Connelly P, Ni H, Ekholm S, Schifitto G and Zhong J 2009 Evaluation of measurement uncertainties in human DTI-derived parameters and optimization of clinical DTI protocols with a wild bootstrap analysis J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 29 422-35