Physical and chemical processes of wintertime secondary nitrate aerosol formation

Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 348-361

  Ying, Qi ^a  

^a Texas A and M University   (United States)

Author keywords

N2O5 heterogeneous reaction; process analysis; secondary nitrate aerosol

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052028959     PISSN: 16737415     EISSN: 16737520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11783-011-0343-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Herner J D, Aw J, Gao O, Chang D P, Kleeman M J. Size and composition distribution of airborne particulate matter in northern California: I-particulate mass, carbon, and water-soluble ions. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005, 55(1): 30-51.
2. 2. 5 particulate matter in Birmingham (UK). Atmospheric Environment, 1997, 31(24): 4103-4117.
3. 2. 5 in Milan (Italy). Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(10): 1925-1934.
4. 10 composition in the atmosphere of Chillan, Chile. Chemosphere, 2004, 54(4): 541-550.
5. Seinfeld J H, Pandis S N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. 2006, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
6. Foley K M, Roselle S J, Appel K W, Bhave P V, Pleim J E, Otte T L, Mathur R, Sarwar G, Young J O, Gilliam R C, Nolte C G, Kelly J T, Gilliland A B, Bash J O. Incremental testing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4. 7. Geoscientific Model Development, 2010, 3(1): 205-226.
7. 5 on chemistry and nitrate aerosol formation in the lower troposphere under photosmog conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2003, 108(D4).
8. 5 reactivity on aqueous particles: the competing effects of particle liquid water, nitrate and chloride. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9(21): 8351-8363.
9. 5: a review. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2011, 45(6): 655-685.
10. 3, and NOx in the nocturnal boundary layer: 1. Observations during the Texas air quality study 2000. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2004, 109(D12).
11. Jang J C C, Jeffries H E, Tonnesen S. Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution-II. Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry. Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 29(21): 3101-3114.
12. Herner J D, Ying Q, Aw J, Gao O, Chang D P Y, Kleeman M J. Dominant mechanisms that shape the airborne particle size and composition distribution in central California. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2006, 40(10): 827-844.
13. Zhang, Y, Wen X Y, Wang K, Vijayaraghavan K, Jacobson M Z. Probing into regional O-3 and particulate matter pollution in the United States: 2. An examination of formation mechanisms through a process analysis technique and sensitivity study. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2009, 114.
14. Kleeman M J, Cass G R. A 3D Eulerian source-oriented model for an externally mixed aerosol. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(24): 4834-4848.
15. Ying Q, Kleeman M J. Source contributions to the regional distribution of secondary particulate matter in California. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(4): 736-752.
16. 2. 5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) using the UCD/CIT source-oriented air quality model-Part I. Base case model results. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42: 8954-8966.
17. Ghosal S, Hemminger J C. Surface adsorbed water on NaCl and its effect on nitric acid reactivity with NaCl powders. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(37): 14102-14108.
18. Zhang Y, Liu P, Liu X H, Pun B, Seigneur C, Jacobson M Z, Wang W X. Fine scale modeling of wintertime aerosol mass, number, and size distributions in central California. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2010, 115.
19. Pun B K, Balmori R T F, Seigneur C. Modeling wintertime particulate matter formation in central California. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(2): 402-409.
20. Livingstone P L, Magliano K, Gürer K, Allen P D, Zhang KM, Ying Q, Jackson B S, Kaduwela A, Kleeman M, Woodhouse L F, Turkiewicz K, Horowitz L W, Scott K, Johnson D, Taylor C, O'Brien G, DaMassa J, Croes B E, Binkowski F, Byun D. Simulating PM concentration during a winter episode in a subtropical valley: sensitivity simulations and evaluation methods. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(37): 5971-5977.
21. 2. 5 Air Quality Study (CPRAQS) using the UCD/CIT Source Oriented Air Quality Model-Part II. Regional source apportionment of primary airborne particulate matter. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(39): 8967-8978.
22. 2. 5 air quality study. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(10): 1331-1340.
23. Ying Q, Kleeman M. Regional contributions to airborne particulate matter in central California during a severe pollution episode. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(6): 1218-1228.
24. Goodin WR, McRae G J, Seinfeld J H. Comparison of interpolation methods for sparse data-application to wind and concentration fields. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1979, 18(6): 761-771.
25. Goodin WR, McRae G J, Seinfeld J H. Objective analysis technique for constructing 3-dimensional urban-scale wind fields. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1980, 19(1): 98-108.
26. Held T, Ying Q, Kaduwela A, Kleeman M. Modeling particulate matter in the San Joaquin Valley with a source-oriented externally mixed three-dimensional photochemical grid model. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(22): 3689-3711.
27. Judith C, John W, Douglas L, Susanne H. Particulate nitrate measurements during CRPAQS. 2004, Desert Research Institute, Aerosol Dynamics In: Reno, NV, Berkeley CA.
28. 2. 5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) using the UCD/CIT source oriented air quality model-part III. Regional source apportionment of secondary and total airborne particulate matter. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43: 419-430.
29. 5 hydrolysis on global model budgets of tropospheric nitrogen oxides, ozone, and OH. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(9): L09813.