Impact of new laboratory studies of N2O5 hydrolysis on global model budgets of tropospheric nitrogen oxides, ozone, and OH

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1-4

  Evans, Mat J ^a,b   Jacob, D J ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS; ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; COMPOSITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DATA REDUCTION; HYDROLYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESEARCH LABORATORIES; TROPOSPHERE;

GLOBAL MODELS; REACTION PROBABILITY; TROPOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY;

NITROGEN COMPOUNDS;

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; HYDROXYL RADICAL; NITROGEN OXIDES; OZONE; TROPOSPHERE;

EID: 21044438168     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005GL022469     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bauer, S. E., Y. Balkanski, M. Schulz, D. A. Hauglustaine, and F. Dentener (2004), Global modeling of heterogenous chemistry on mineral aerosol surfaces: Influence on tropospheric ozone chemistry and comparison to observations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D02304, doi:10.1029/2003JD003868.
2. Bey, I., D. J. Jacob, R. M. Yantosca, J. A. Logan, B. D. Field, A. M. Fiore, Q. Li, H. Y. Liu, L. J. Mickley, and M. G. Schultz (2001), Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23,073-23,096.
3. Bradan, C. F., and J. P. D. Abbatt (2004), A study of the phase transition behavior of internally mixed ammonium sulfate-malonic acid aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1451-1459.
4. Chin, M., P. Ginoux, S. Kinne, O. Torres, B. Holben, B. N. Duncan, R. V. Martin, J. A. Logan, A. Higurashi, and T. Nakajima (2000a), Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Comparison with field observations and regional budgets, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24,689-24,712.
5. Chin, M., R. B. Rood, S.-J. Lin, J. F. Muller, and A. M. Thompon (2000b), Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Model description and global properties, J Geophys. Res., 105, 24,671-24,687.
6. 3, and OH, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 7149-7163.
7. Emmons, L. K., D. A. Hauglustaine, J.-F. Muller, M. A. Carroll, G. P. Brasseur, D. Brunner, J. Staehelin, V. Thouret, and A. Marenco (2000), Data composites of airborne observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 20,497-20,538.
8. Ginoux, P. M., M. Chin, I. Tegen, J. M. Prospero, B. Holben, O. Dubovik, and S. Lin (2001), Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 22,055-22,074.
9. 5 on sub-micron sulfate aerosol, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 5(16), 3453-3463.
10. Hudman, R. C., et al. (2004), Ozone production in transpacific Asian pollution plumes and implications for ozone air quality in California, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23S10, doi:10.1029/2004JD004974.
11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, edited by J. T. Houghton et al., 892 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
12. Jacob, D. J. (2000), Heterogenous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2131-2159.
13. 4 aerosol, J. Phys. Chem, 105(26), 6465-6570.
14. Krol, M., P. J. van Leeuwen, and J. Lelieveld (1998), Global OH trends inferred from methyl-chloroform measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 10,697-10,711.
15. Logan, J. A. (1999), An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere: Recommendations for testing 3-D models and development of a gridded climatology for tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16,115-16,149.
16. Marcolli, C., B. P. Luo, and T. Peter (2004), Mixing of the organic aerosol fractions: Liquids as the thermodynamically stable phases, J. Phys. Chem. A, 108(12), 2216-2224.
17. 2 columns, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D17), 4537, doi:10.1029/2003JD003453.
18. Martin, R. V., D. J. Jacob, R. M. Yantosca, M. Chin, and P. Ginoux (2003b), Global and regional decreases in tropospheric oxidants from photochemical effects of aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D3), 4097, doi:10.1029/2002JD002622.
19. Martin, S. (2000), Phase transitions of aqueous atmospheric particles, Chem. Rev., 100, 3403-3453.
20. Martin, S. T., H.-M. Hung, R. J. Park, D. J. Jacob, R. J. D. Spurr, K. V. Chance, and M. Chin (2004), Effects of the physical state of tropospheric ammonium-sulfate-nitrate particles on global aerosol direct radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 183-214.
21. McKeen, S. A., J. B. Gierczak, J. B. Burkholder, P. O. Wennberg, T. F. Hanisco, E. R. Keim, R.-S. Gao, A. R. Ravishankara, and D. W. Fahey (1997), The photochemistry of acetone in the upper troposphere: A source of odd-hydrogen radicals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 3177-3180.
22. Park, R. J., D. J. Jacob, B. D. Field, R. M. Yantosca, and M. Chin (2004), Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols in the United States: Implications for policy, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D15204, doi:10.1029/2003JD004473.
23. Prinn, R. G., et al. (2001), Evidence for substantial variations in atmospheric hydroxyl radicals in the past two decades, Science, 292, 1882-1888.
24. Sander, S. P., et al. (2003), Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in atmospheric studies, evaluation number 14, JPL Publ., 02-25, 334 pp.
25. x budget in the upper troposphere over the tropical South Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6669-6679.
26. Spivakovsky, C. M., et al. (2000), Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 8931-8980.
27. x budget and the role of odd nitrogen reservoir recycling, Atmos. Environ., 37(24), 3351-3364.
28. 5 hydrolysis on sub-micron organic aerosol: The effect of relative humidity, particle phase and particle size, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5(20), 4593-4603.
29. Tie, X., G. Brasseur, L. Emmons, L. Horowitz, and D. Kinnison (2001), Effects of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants: A global model study, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 22,931-22,964.
30. x and ozone budgets: Model simulations and TOPSE evidence, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D4), 8364, doi:10.1029/2001JD001508.
31. x-hydrocarbon chemistry: 1. Model formulation, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 10,713-10,725.