Diversity and pluralism in earth system governance: Contemplating the role for global administrative law

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1875-1881

  Spagnuolo, Francesca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accountability; Diversity; Earth system governance; Global administrative law; Legitimacy; Pluralism

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM; DECISION MAKING; DEMOCRACY; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IMPERIALISM; MARGINALIZATION;

EID: 80052021370     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.024     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agarwal B. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 2001, 29(10):1623-1648.
2. Baber W.F., Bartlett R.V. Global democracy and sustainable jurisprudence. Deliberative Environmental Law 2009, 224. MIT Press, Cambridge.
3. Power in Global Governance 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 324pp. M. Barnett, R. Duvall (Eds.).
4. Berman H.J. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition 1983, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 674pp.
5. Berman P.S. Global legal pluralism. Southern California Law Review 2007, 80:1155-1237.
6. Bhagwati J. After Seattle: free trade and the WTO. Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy in the Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium 2001, 60-61. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. R.B. Porter (Ed.).
7. Biermann F. The rising tide of green unilateralism in world trade law. Options for reconciling the emerging north-south conflict. Journal of World Trade 2001, 35(3):421-448.
8. Biermann F. Earth System Governance. The Challenge for Social Science 2005, Inaugural lecture, Vrjie Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
9. Biermann F. 'Earth system governance' as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change. Human and Policy Dimensions 2007, 17:326-337.
10. Biermann F., Gupta A. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics 2011, 70:1856-1864. (this issue).
11. Biermann F., et al. Earth System Governance: People, Places and the Planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project, ESG Report 1, Bonn, IHDP: The Earth System Governance Project 2009.
12. Biermann F., Betsill M.M., Gupta J., Kanie N., Lebel L., Liverman D., Schroeder H., Siebenhüner B., Zondervan R. Earth system governance: a research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2010, 10(4):277-288.
13. Cassese S. Global standards for national administrative procedure. Law & Contemporary Problems 2005, 68(3 & 4):109-126.
14. Cassese S. The globalization of law. Journal of International Law and Politics 2005, 37(4):973-993.
15. Cassese S. Administrative law without the state? The challenge of global regulation. N.Y.U.J. Int'L.L. &Pol. 2006, 37:663-694.
16. Cassese S. Is there a global administrative law. The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions 2010, 761-776. Springer, Berlin. A. von Bogdandy (Ed.).
17. Chimni B.S. WTO and environment: shrimp-turtle and EC-hormone cases. Economic and Political Weekly. 2000, 35:1752-1761.
18. Chimni B.S. WTO and environment: legitimization of unilateral trade sanctions. Economic and Political Weekly. 2002, 37:133-140.
19. Chimni B.S. International institutions today: an imperial global state in the making. The European Journal of International Law 2004, 15(1):1-37.
20. Chimni, B. S., 2005. Cooption and resistance: two faces of global administrative law. IILJ Working Paper 2005/16, Global Administrative Law Series.
21. Dryzek J.S., Stevenson H. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics 2011, 70:1865-1874. (this issue).
22. Esty D.C. Good governance at the supranational scale: globalizing administrative law. Yale Law Journal 2006, 115:1490-1562.
23. Ghosh A., Woods N. Developing country concerns about climate finance. proposals, priorities and the credible donor problem. Climate Finance. Regulatory and Funding Strategies for Climate Change and Global Development 2009, 157-164. New York University Press, New York and London. R.B. Stewart, B. Kingsbury, B. Rudyk (Eds.).
24. Gramsci A. Selections from the Prison Notebooks 1971, International Publishers, New York, 572pp. Q. Hoare, G. Nowell Smith (Eds.).
25. Grant R.W., Keohane R.O. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review 2005, 99(1):29-43.
26. Gupta A. Transparency under scrutiny: information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 2008, 8(2):1-7.
27. Gupta A. Transparency as contested political terrain: who knows what about the global GMO trade and why does it matter?. Global Environmental Politics 2010, 10(3):32-52.
28. Habermas J. The Post-National Constellation: Political Essays 2001, 216. MIT Press, Cambridge. M. Pensky (Ed.).
29. Hardt M., Negri A. Empire 2000, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London, pp. 478.
30. Harlow C. Global administrative law: the quest for principles and values. European Journal of International Law 2006, 17(1):187-214.
31. Hey E. Distributive justice and procedural fairness in global water law. Environmental Law and Justice in Context 2009, 351-370. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Ebbesson, P. Okowa (Eds.).
32. Hood C. A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration 1991, 69(1):3-19.
33. Howse R. The WTO System: Law, Politics & Legitimacy 2007, 314. Cameron May Ltd, London.
34. Howse R., Nicolaidis K. Democracy without sovereignty: the global vocation of political ethics. The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law 2008, 163-191. Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland. T. Broude, J. Shany (Eds.).
35. Ikenberry G.J. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars 2000, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J., 320pp.
36. Jackson J.H. The varied policies of international juridical bodies. Reflections on theory and practice. Michigan Journal of International Law 2004, 25:869-878.
37. Keohane R.O. Accountability in world politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 2006, 29(2):75-87.
38. Kingsbury, B., 2009. The concept of 'law' in global administrative law. IILJ Working Paper 2009/1. Global Administrative Law Series.
39. Kingsbury B., Krisch N., Stewart R.S. The emergence of global administrative law. Law & Contemporary Problems 2005, 68(3 & 4):15-61.
40. Krisch N. The pluralism of global administrative law. European Journal of International Law 2006, 17(1):247-278.
41. Levy D.L., Egan D. Conflict and Accommodation in International Environmental Regimes: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Climate Change Negotiations. Critical Management Studies Conference, UMIST, July, 1999, Environment Stream 1999.
42. Levy D.L., Egan D. A neo Gramscian approach to business society relations: conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiation. Journal of Management Studies 2003, 40(4):803-829.
43. Marks S. Naming global administrative law. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 2006, 37(4):995-1001.
44. Massey I.P. Administrative Law 2001, 764. Eastern Book Company, Lucknow.
45. Matsushita M., Schoenbaum T.J., Mavroidis P.C. The World Trade Organization, Law, Practice, and Policy 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 989.
46. Mattei U. A theory of imperial law. A study on U.S. hegemony and the Latin resistance. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2003, 10(1):383-488.
47. Mattei U., Nader L. Plunder: When The Rule of Law is Illegal 2008, 296. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
48. Mitchell R.B. Transparency for governance: the mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies. Ecological Economics 2011, (this section).
49. Nicolaidis K., Shaffer G. Transnational mutual recognition regimes: governance without global government. Law & Contemporary Problems 2005, 68(3 & 4):263-317.
50. Peerenboom R. Varieties of rule of law. An introduction and provisional conclusion. Asian Discourses of Rule of Law 2004, 1-55. Routledge, London. R. Peerenboom (Ed.).
51. Pereira R.A. Why would international administrative activity be any less legitimate? A study of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. German Law Journal 2008, 9(11):1693-1718.
52. Rosendal G.K., Andresen S. Institutional design for improved forest governance through REDD. Lessons from the global environmental facility. Ecological Economics 2011, 70:1908-1915. (this issue).
53. Rupert M. Ideologies of Globalization: Contending Visions of a New World Order, Routledge, New York 2000, 208.
54. Scharpf F.W. Economic integration, democracy and the welfare state. Journal of European Public Policy 1997, 4(1):18-36.
55. Shaffer G. Power, governance and the WTO: a comparative institutional approach. Power in Global Governance 2005, 130-160. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M. Barnett, R. Duvall (Eds.).
56. Shapiro S.A. International trade agreements, regulatory protection, and public accountability. Administrative Law Review 2002, 54:435-458.
57. Slaughter A.M. A New World Order 2004, 317. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
58. Stewart, R.B., Ratton Sanchez Badin, M., 2009. The World Trade Organization and global administrative law. IILJ Working Paper 2009/7, Global Administrative Law Series.
59. Stiglitz J. Globalization and Its Discontents 2002, Norton, New York and London, pp. 282.
60. Tay A.E. "Asian Values" and the Rule of Law, Jura Gentium, online at (accessed 24 July 2010). http://www.juragentium.unifi.it/en/surveys/rol/tay.htm.
61. Weiler, J. H. H., 2000. The rule of lawyers and the ethos of diplomats: reflections on the internal and external legitimacy of WTO dispute settlement. Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 9/00.
62. Whitman J.Q. Western legal imperialism: thinking about the deep historical roots. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2009, 10(2). available at. http://www.bepress.com/til/default/vol10/iss2/art2.
63. World Bank Water Resources Sector Strategy 2004, World Bank, Washington, DC.