Moving a formative test from a paper-based to a computer-based format. A student viewpoint

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 738-743

  Rudland, Joy R ^a   Schwartz, Peter ^a   Ali, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80052000291     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577119     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Clariana R, Wallace P. 2002. Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode. Br J Educ Technol 33:593-602.
2. De Angelis S. 2000. Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing. J Allied Health 29:161-164.
3. Gwalltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. 2008. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta analytic review. Value Health 11:322-333. (Pubitemid 351473608)
4. Lempp H, Seale C. 2004. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: Qualitative study of medical students' perceptions of teaching. BMJ 329:770-773. (Pubitemid 39361867)
5. Lim ECH, Ong BKC, Wilder-Smith EPV, Seet RCS. 2006. Computer based versus pen and paper testing: Students' perception. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35:599-603. (Pubitemid 44845336)
6. Mason BJ, Patry M, Berstein DJ. 2001. An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer based and traditional testing. J Educ Comp Res 24: 29-39. (Pubitemid 33403230)
7. Rubenstein K, Patterson J, Johnstone R. 1998. Improving criteria and feedback in student assessment in law. Abingdon, Oxford, UK: Routledge Cavendish.
8. Russo A. 2002. Mixing technology and testing. School Adm 59(4):6-12.
9. Schwartz P. 2009. Ako Aotearoa. [Accessed December 2010] Available from: http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/ako-hub/good-practice-publication-grants-e-book/ resources/pages/most-unusual-examination-progress-te
10. Wang S, Jiao H, Young MJ, Brooks TE, Olson J. 2008. Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessment: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educ Psychol Meas 68:5-24.