The influence of dental loupes on the quality of adhesive removal in orthodontic debonding;Einfluss von Lupenbrillen auf die Qualität der Adhäsiv- Restentfernung bei orthodontischem Debonding

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 125-132

  Baumann, Denis F ^a   Brauchli, Lorenz ^a   Van Waes, Hubertus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Debonding; Enamel; Loupe; Magnification; Roughness; Surface

Indexed keywords

TOOTH CEMENT;

ADHESION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL DEBONDING; ENAMEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPECTACLES; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADHESIVENESS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051758402     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-011-0010-y     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Al Shamsi AH, Cunningham JL, Laamey PJ, Lynch E (2007) Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:301.e9-301.e15
2. Brown CR, Way DC (1978) Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Orthod 74:663-671
3. Caspersen I (1977) Residual acrylic adhesive after removal of plastic orthodontic brackets: a scanning electron microscopic study. Am J Orthod 71:637-650 (Pubitemid 8146825)
4. Christensen GJ (2003) Magnification in dentistry: useful tool or another gimmick? J Am Dent Assoc 134:1647-1650 (Pubitemid 38041490)
5. Diedrich P (1981) Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod 79:500-522 (Pubitemid 11036890)
6. DIN Standard 6580 (n d) Terminology of chip removing; movements and geometry of the chip removing process: DIN Group, German Institute for Standardization, Berlin, Germany
7. Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, Makou M (2004) Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods. Eur J Orthod 26:333-338 (Pubitemid 41296481)
8. Forgie AH, Pine CM, Pitts NB (2001) Restoration removal with and without the aid of magnification. J Oral Rehabil 28:309-313 (Pubitemid 33754619)
9. Friedman MJ, Mora AF, Schmidt R (1999) Microscope-assisted precision dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20:723-728, 730-731, 735-736, quiz737
10. Friedman MJ (2004) Magnification in a restorative dental practice: from loupes to microscopes. Compend Contin Educ Dent 25:48, 50, 53-55
11. Hannemann M, Diedrich P (1986) Der Einsatz des Prophy-Jet®- Gerätes zur Schmelzpolitur nach der Bracketentfernung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 47:317-326
12. Hong YH, Lew KK (1995) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding. Eur J Orthod 17:121-128
13. Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ (2004) Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:717-724 (Pubitemid 39601479)
14. Howell S, Weekes WT (1990) An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures. Aust Dent J 35:245-252
15. Kim SS, Park WK, Son WS et al (2007) Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sandblasting: a 3-dimensional surface profilometry study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:71-76
16. Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE (1993) Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:258-266
17. Lussi A, Kronenberg O, Megert B (2003) The effect of magnification on the iatrogenic damage to adjacent tooth surfaces during class II preparation. J Dent 31:291-296 (Pubitemid 36870935)
18. Maillet JP, Millar AM, Burke JM et al (2008) Effect of magnification loupes on dental hygiene student posture. J Dent Educ 72:33-44
19. Mannerberg F (1968) Appearance of tooth surface of teeth showing dental fluorosis as observed by shadowed replicas. Odontol Revy 19:271-291
20. Millar BJ (1998) Focus on loupes. Br Dent J 185:504-508 (Pubitemid 128529063)
21. Newman GV, Facq JM (1971) The effects of adhesive systems on tooth surfaces. Am J Orthod 59:67-76
22. Øgaard B (2001) Oral microbiological changes, long term enamel alterations due to decalcification and caries prophylactic aspects. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 124-39
23. Oliver RG, Griffiths J (1992) Different techniques of residual composite removal following debonding -time taken and surface enamel appearance. Br J Orthod 19:131-137
24. Özer T, Başaran G, Kama JD (2010) Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:368-374
25. Radlanski RJ (2001) A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding. J Orofac Orthop 62:296-304 (Pubitemid 33692933)
26. Schuler FS, Van Waes H (2003) SEM-evaluation of enamel surfaces after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Dent 16:390-394 (Pubitemid 41310036)
27. Sims AP, Roberts-Harry TJ, Roberts-Harry DP (1993) The incidence and prevention of ocular injuries in orthodontic practice. Br J Orthod 20:339-343
28. Staribratova-Reister K, Jost-Brinkmann PG (2004) Bonding and debonding characteristics of APC-plus clarity brackets compared to APC clarity brackets. World J Orthod 5:312-316
29. Strobl K, Bahns TL, Willham L et al (1992) Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101:152-158
30. Thompson RE, Way DC (1981) Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod 79:282-295 (Pubitemid 11081282)
31. Van Waes H, Matter T, Krejci I (1997) Three-dimensional measurement of enamel loss caused by bonding and debonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:666-669
32. Zachrisson BU, Arthun J (1979) Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 75:121-127
33. Zarrinnia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ (1995) The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:284-293