Restoration removal with and without the aid of magnification

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 309-313

  Forgie, A H ^a   Pine, C M ^a   Pitts, N B ^a  

^a DUNDEE DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conservative dentistry; Magnification; Operative dentistry; Re restoration; Vision and cavity enlargement

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; RETREATMENT; VISION;

ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; LENSES; MIDDLE AGED; RETREATMENT; VISION;

EID: 0035317333     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00680.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. CRUICKSHANK, E.J. (1998) Can chemical softening agents minimize cavity enlargement during removal of failed anterior resin composite restorations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 25, 167.
2. FORGIE, A.H., PINE, C.M. & PITTS, N.B. (1999) Diagnostic accuracy of five levels of magnification on occlusal surfaces: a comparison to unaided vision. Caries Research. 33, 317 (abstract).
3. MILLAR, B.J., ROBINSON, P.B. & DAVIES, B.R. (1992) Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on class II cavities. British Dental Journal, 173, 210.
4. SCOTTISH DENTAL PRACTICE BOARD (1997) Annual report 1996/7. Scottish Office, Edinburgh.
5. WILSON, N.H., BURKE, F.J. & MJOR, I.A. (1997) Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence International, 28, 245.