Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sandblasting: A 3-dimensional surface profilometry study

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 71-76

  Kim, Seong Sik ^a   Park, Woo Kyung ^a   Son, Woo Sung ^a   Ahn, Hyung Soo ^a   Ro, Jung Hoon ^b   Kim, Yong Deok ^a  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^b Pusan National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 34447105461     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Campbell P.M. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 65 (1995) 103-110
2. Hong Y.H., and Lew K.K.K. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding. Eur J Orthod 17 (1995) 121-128
3. Krell K.V., Courey J.M., and Bishara S.E. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 (1993) 258-266
4. Oliver R.G., and Griffiths J. Different techniques of residual composite removal following debonding-time taken and surface enamel appearance. Br J Orthod 19 (1992) 131-137
5. Retief D.H., and Denys F.R. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod 49 (1979) 1-10
6. Thomas B.W., Hook C.R., and Draughn R.A. Laser-aided degradation of composite resin. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 281-286
7. Alexander R., Xie J., and Fried D. Selective removal of residual composite from dental enamel surfaces using the third harmonic of a Q-switched ND:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 30 (2002) 240-245
8. Zachrisson B.U., and Arthun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 75 (1979) 121-137
9. Zachrisson B.U. Bonding in orthodontics. Chap. 10. In: Graber T.M., and Varnasdal R.J. (Eds). Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 2nd ed. (1994), Mosby, St Louis 570-583
10. Buyukyilmaz T., and Zachrisson B.U. Improved orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam. Part 2. Lathe-cut, admixed, and spherical amalgams with different intermediate resins. Angle Orthod 68 (1998) 337-344
11. Millett D., McCabe J.F., and Gordon P.H. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 20 (1993) 117-122
12. Reisner K.R., Levitt H.L., and Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111 (1997) 366-373
13. Zach L., and Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Pathol 19 (1965) 515-530
14. Zarrinnia K., Eid N.M., and Kehoe M.J. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 (1995) 284-293
15. Williams O.L., and Bishara S.E. Patient discomfort levels at the time of debonding: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101 (1992) 313-319
16. Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod 79 (1981) 500-522
17. Benson P.E., Pender N., Higham S.M., and Edgar W.M. Morphometric assessment of enamel demineralization from photographs. J Dent 26 (1998) 669-677
18. David V.A., Staley R.N., Bigelow H.F., and Jakobsen J.R. Remnant amount and cleanup for 3 adhesives after debracketing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121 (2002) 291-296
19. Pus M.D., and Way D.C. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod 77 (1980) 269-283
20. Thompson R.E., and Way D.C. Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod 79 (1981) 282-295
21. Howell S., and Weekes W.T. An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures. Aust Dent J 35 (1990) 245-252
22. O'Reilly M.M., and Featherstone J.D.B. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92 (1987) 33-40
23. Chung K., Hsu B., Berry T., and Hsieh T. Effect of sandblasting on the bone strength of the bondable molar tube bracket. J Oral Rehabil 28 (2001) 418-424
24. Levitt H.L., and Zachrisson B.U. Orthodontic bonding. In: Marks M.H., and Corn H. (Eds). Atlas of adult orthodontics: functional and esthetic enhancement (1989), Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 506-511