Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 333-338

  Eliades, Theodore ^a,c   Gioka, Christiana ^a   Eliades, George ^a   Makou, Margarita ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMOND; RESIN CEMENT; TUNGSTEN CARBIDE; TUNGSTEN DERIVATIVE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DIAMOND; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TUNGSTEN COMPOUNDS;

EID: 3042758052     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.3.333     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Burapavong V, Marshall G W, Apfel D A, Perry H T 1978 Enamel surface characteristics on removal of bonded orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics 74: 176-187
2. Campbell P M 1995 Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthodontist 65: 103-110
3. David V A, Staley R N, Bigelow H F, Jakobsen J R 2002 Remnant amount and cleanup for 3 adhesives after debracketing. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 121: 291-296
4. Eliades T, Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Bradley T G 2001 Comparison of enamel colour changes associated with orthodontic bonding using two different adhesives. European Journal of Orthodontics 23: 85-90
5. Gwinnett A J, Gorelick L 1977 Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding: clinical application. American Journal of Orthodontics 71: 651-665
6. Hong Y H, Lew K K K 1995 Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding. European Journal of Orthodontics 17: 121-128
7. Howell S, Weekes W T 1990 An electron microscopic evaluation of the enamel surface subsequent to various debonding procedures. Australian Dental Journal 35: 245-252
8. Øgaard B 2001 Oral microbiological changes, long-term enamel alterations due to decalcification and caries prophylactic aspects. In: Brantley W A, Eliades T (eds) Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 124-139
9. Oliver R G, Griffiths J 1992 Different techniques of residual composite removal following debonding - time taken and surface enamel appearance. British Journal of Orthodontics 19: 131-137
10. Piacentini C, Sfondrini G 1996 A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 109: 57-63
11. Pus M D, Way D C 1980 Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 269-283
12. Radlanski R J 2001 A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 62: 296-304
13. Radlanski R J, Jäger A, Zimmer B, Bertzbach F 1990 Scanning electron microscopic studies on the clinical use of interdental stripping. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 51: 117-122
14. Retief D H, Denys F R 1979 Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments. Angle Orthodontist 49: 1-10
15. Rouleau B D, Marshall Jr G W, Cooley R O 1982 Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 423-426
16. Ruppenthal T, Stratmann U, Sergl H G, Czech D 1992 Element analytical and quantitative morphometric evaluation of adhesive remnants and enamel loss after debonding of metal brackets. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 53: 99-105
17. Siegel S C, von Fraunhofer J A 1999 Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light touch? Journal of Prosthodontics 8: 3-9
18. 2 laser radiation: surface effects. Journal of Clinical Laser Medical Surgery 17: 13-18
19. Sokal R R, Rohlf F J 1995 Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd edn. Freeman, New York, pp. 330-335
20. Thomas B W, Hook C R, Draughn R A 1996 Laser-aided degradation of composite resin. Angle Orthodontist 66: 281-286
21. Vieira A C, Pinto R A, Chevitarese O, Almeida M A 1993 Polishing after debracketing: its influence upon enamel surface. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 18: 7-11
22. Whitehead S A, Shearer A S C, Wilson N H F 1995 Comparison of methods for measuring surface roughness of ceramic. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 22: 421-426
23. Whitehead S A, Shearer A C, Watts D C, Wilson N H F 1996 Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture. Dental Materials 15: 79-86
24. Zarrinnia K, Eid N M, Kehoe M J 1995 The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 108: 284-293