Scientific reasoning in a real-world context: The effect of prior belief and outcome on children's hypothesis-testing strategies

British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 409-424

  Croker, Steve ^a   Buchanan, Heather ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBLEM SOLVING; SCIENCE; THINKING; UNITED KINGDOM;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURE; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; SCIENCE; THINKING;

EID: 80051757523     PISSN: 0261510X     EISSN: 2044835X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/026151010X496906     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Amsel, E., & Brock, S. (1996). The development of evidence evaluation skills. Cognitive Development, 11(4), 523-550. doi:.
2. Atance, C. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). My future self: Young children's ability to anticipate and explain future states. Cognitive Development, 20(3), 341-361. doi:.
3. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA Bradford Books/MIT Press.
4. Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70(5), 1098-1120. doi:.
5. Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. D. (1983). Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 29-39. doi:.
6. Croker, S., & Buchanan, H. (2008). Children's perceptions of oral health and disease: A developmental study. Psychology and Health, 23(S1), 93-94. doi:.
7. Greenhoot, A. F., Semb, G., Colombo, J., & Schreiber, T. (2004). Prior beliefs and methodological concepts in scientific reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(2), 203-221.
8. Klaczynski, P. A. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71(5), 1347-1366. doi:.
9. Klaczynski, P. A., & Narasimham, G. (1998). Development of scientific reasoning biases: Cognitive versus ego-protective explanations. Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 175-187. doi:.
10. Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual-space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1-48.
11. Klahr, D., Fay, A. L., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation - a developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 111-146. doi:.
12. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis-testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211-228. doi:.
13. Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children: Preschoolers' ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 141-152. doi:.
14. Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
15. Koslowski, B., & Masnick, A. (2002). The development of causal reasoning. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 257-281). Oxford Blackwell Publishing.
16. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674-689. doi:.
17. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking. San Diego, CA Academic Press.
18. Kuhn, D., García-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(4) Serial No 245 doi:.
19. Legare, C. H., Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). Evidence for an explanation advantage in naïve biological reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 177-194. doi:.
20. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A. Renninger & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (6th ed., pp. 153-196). Hoboken, NJ Wiley.
21. Penner, D. E., & Klahr, D. (1996). The interaction of domain-specific knowledge and domain-general discovery strategies: A study with sinking objects. Child Development, 67(6), 2709-2727. doi:.
22. Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R., & Doherty, M. (1993). Reflecting on scientific thinking: Children's understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. Child Development, 64(6), 1617-1636. doi:.
23. Samarapungavan, A. (1992). Childrens judgments in theory choice tasks: Scientific rationality in childhood. Cognition, 45(1), 1-32. doi:.
24. Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 102-119. doi:.
25. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859-882. doi:.
26. Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1045-1050. doi:.
27. Schulz, L. E., Bonawitz, E. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Can being scared give you a tummy ache? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence and preschoolers' causal inferences. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1124-1139. doi:.
28. Schulz, L. E., Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. D., & Jenkins, A. C. (2008). Going beyond the evidence: Preschoolers' inferences about abstract causal laws and responses to anomalous data. Cognition, 109(2), 211-223. doi:.
29. Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62(4), 753-766. doi:.
30. Tschirgi, J. E. (1980). Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development, 51(1), 1-10. doi:.
31. Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2007). Causal reasoning as informed by the early development of explanations. In A. Gopnik & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy and computation. New York Oxford University Press.
32. Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172-223. doi:.
33. Zimmerman, C., & Glaser, R. (2001). Testing positive versus negative claims: A preliminary investigation of the role of cover story in the assessment of experimental design skills (Tech. Rep. No. 554). Los Angeles, CA UCLA National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).