Effects of automated and participative decision support in computer-aided credibility assessment

Journal of Management Information Systems

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 201-234

  Jensen, Matthew ^a   Lowry, Paul ^b   Jenkins, Jeffrey ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Credibility assessment; decision support systems; indirect cues elicitation; linguistic analysis; signal detection theory

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; LINGUISTICS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

ASSESSMENT ACCURACY; AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS; CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING THEORIES; INDIRECT CUES ELICITATION; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 80051745905     PISSN: 07421222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222280107     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aaronson, D., and Watts, B. Extensions of Grier's computational formulas for A and B to below-chance performance. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3 (1987), 439-442.
2. Biros, D.P.; George, J.F.; and Zmud, R.W. Inducing sensitivity to deception in order to improve decision making performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 26, 2 (2002), 119-144.
3. Bond, C.F., and DePaulo, B.M. Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 3 (2006), 214-234.
4. Bond, C.F., and DePaulo, B.M. Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 4 (2008), 477-492.
5. Buller, D.B., and Burgoon, J.K. Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 3 (1996), 203-242.
6. Buller, D.B.; Burgoon, J.K.; Buslig, A.; and Roiger, J. Interpersonal deception: VIII. Nonverbal and verbal correlates of equivocation from the Bavelas et al. (1990) research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 4 (1994), 396-417.
7. Burgoon, J.K., and Qin, T. The dynamic nature of deceptive verbal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 1 (2006), 76-96. (Pubitemid 43812362)
8. Burgoon, J.K.; Blair, J.P.; and Strom, R.E. Cognitive biases and nonverbal cue availability in detecting deception. Human Communication Research, 34, 4 (2008), 572-599.
9. Burgoon, J.K.; Buller, D.B.; and Woodall, W.G. Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
10. Burgoon, J.K.; Jensen, M.L.; Kruse, J.; Meservy, T.O.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Deception and intention detection. In H. Chen, T.S. Raghu, R. Ramesh, A. Vinze, and D. Zeng (eds.), Handbooks in Information Systems, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 187-208.
11. Chaiken, S., and Maheswaran, D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 3 (1994), 460-473.
12. Clark, T.D.; Jones, M.C.; and Armstrong, C.P. The dynamic structure of management support systems: Theory development, research focus, and direction. MIS Quarterly, 31, 3 (2007), 579-615. (Pubitemid 47359825)
13. Coch, L., and French, J.R.P. Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1, 4 (1948), 512-532.
14. DePaulo, B., and Kashy, D. Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1 (1998), 63-79. (Pubitemid 128458955)
15. DePaulo, B.; Lindsay, J.; Malone, B.; Muhlenbruck, L.; Charlton, K.; and Cooper, H . Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 1 (2003), 74-118. (Pubitemid 41103269)
16. Derrick, D.C.; Elkins, A.C.; Burgoon, J.K.; Nunamaker, J.F.; and Zeng, D.D. Border security credibility assessments via heterogeneous sensor fusion. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25, 3 (2010), 41-49.
17. Ekman, P. Telling Lies. New York: Norton, 1985.
18. Erez, M., and Kanfer, F.H. The role of goal acceptance in goal setting and task performance. Academy of Management Review, 8, 3 (1983), 454-463.
19. Erez, M.; Earley, P.C.; and Hulin, C.L. The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 1 (1985), 50-66.
20. Exline, R.; Thibaut, J.; Hickey, C.; and Gumpert, P., Visual interaction in relation to Machiavellianism and an unethical act. In R. Christie and F. Geis (eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 1970, pp. 53-75.
21. Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.
22. Frank, M.G., and Feeley, T.H. To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 1 (2003), 58-75. (Pubitemid 36256533)
23. Fuller, C.M.; Biros, D.P.; and Wilson, R.L. Decision support for determining veracity via linguistic-based cues. Decision Support Systems, 46, 3 (2009), 695-703.
24. Global Deception Research Team. A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 1 (2006), 60-74.
25. Green, D., and Swets, J. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
26. Henig, R.M. Looking for the lie. New York Times Magazine, February 5, 2006.
27. Hovland, C.; Janis, I.; and Kelley, H. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
28. Humpherys, S.L.; Moffitt, K.C.; Burns, M.B.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Felix, W.F. Identification of fraudulent financial statements using linguistic credibility analysis. Decision Support Systems, 50, 3 (2011), 585-594.
29. Jensen, M.L.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Judging the credibility of information gathered from face-to-face interactions. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality, 2, 1 (2010), 301-320.
30. Jensen, M.L.; Lowry, P.B.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Technology dominance in complex decision making: The case of aided credibility assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 1 (Summer 2010), 175-202.
31. Jensen, M.L.; Meservy, T.O.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Automatic, multimodal evaluation of human interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 4 (2010), 367-389.
32. Lee, C.-C., and Welker, R.B. Identification of perceived interviewee behaviors that influence auditors' assessment of deception. International Journal of Auditing, 12, 3 (2008), 205-220.
33. Lee, C.C.; Welker, R.B.; and Odom, M.D. Features of computer-mediated, text-based messages that support automatable, linguistics-based indicators for deception detection. Journal of Information Systems, 23, 1 (2009), 5-24.
34. Levine, T.R.; Park, H.S.; and McCornack, S.A. Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the "veracity effect." Communication Monographs, 66, 2 (1999), 125-144.
35. Levine, T.R.; Kim, R.K.; Park, H.S.; and Hughes, M. Deception detection accuracy is a predictable linear function of message veracity base-rate: A formal test of Park and Levine's probability model. Communication Monographs, 73, 3 (2006), 243-260. (Pubitemid 44576498)
36. Liang, T.P.; Lai, H.J.; and Ku, Y.C. Personalized content recommendation and user satisfaction: Theoretical synthesis and empirical findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 3 (Winter 2006-7), 45-70.
37. Locke, E.A., and Schweiger, D.M. Participation in decision-making: One more look. In B.M. Staw (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979, pp. 265-339.
38. Mak, B.; Schmitt, B.H.; and Lyytinen, K. User participation in knowledge update of expert systems. Information & Management, 32, 2 (1997), 55-63. (Pubitemid 127385496)
39. McCornack, S.A., and Parks, M. Deception detection and the other side of trust. In M.L. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication Yearbook 9. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986, pp. 377-389.
40. Meservy, T.O.; Jensen, M.L.; Kruse, J.; Twitchell, D.P.; Tsechpenakis, G.; Burgoon, J.K.; Metaxas, D.N.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Deception detection through automatic, unobtrusive analysis of nonverbal behavior. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20, 5 (2005), 36-43. (Pubitemid 41527270)
41. Metzger, M.J.; Flanagin, A.J.; Eyal, K.; Lemus, D.R.; and McCann, R.M. Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In P.J. Kalbfleisch (ed.), Communication Yearbook, 27. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003, pp. 293-336.
42. Newell, A., and Simon, H.A. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972.
43. O'Sullivan, M.; Ekman, P.; and Friesen, W.V. The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 3 (1988), 203-215.
44. Parasuraman, R. Human-computer monitoring. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 29, 6 (1987), 695-706.
45. Pollack, I., and Norman, D.A. A nonparametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychometric Science, 1, 5 (1964), 125-126.
46. Schweitzer, M.E.; Author, J.C.H.; and Bradlow, E.T. Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 1 (2006), 1-19. (Pubitemid 44458166)
47. Stanislaw, H., and Todorov, N. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 1 (1999), 137-149.
48. Swets, J.A. Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 1 (1986), 301-340.
49. Vance, A.; Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C.; and Straub, D.W. Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (Spring 2008), 73-100. (Pubitemid 351721658)
50. Vrij, A. Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and Implications for Professional Practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
51. Vrij, A.; Edward, K.; and Bull, R. Police officer's ability to detect deceit: The benefits of indirect deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 2 (2001), 185-196. (Pubitemid 32862023)
52. Vrij, A.; Evans, H.; Akehurst, L.; and Mann, S. Rapid judgments in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 3 (2004), 283-296. (Pubitemid 39462020)
53. Vroom, V.H., and Yetton, P.W. Leadership and Decision-Making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973.
54. Wang, H.C., and Doong, H.S. Online customers' cognitive differences and their impact on the success of recommendation agents. Information & Management, 47, 2 (2010), 109-114.
55. Wang, W., and Benbasat, I. Attributions of trust in decision support technologies: A study of recommendation agents for e-commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (Spring 2008), 249-273. (Pubitemid 351721665)
56. Xiao, B., and Benbasat, I. Ecommerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 137-209. (Pubitemid 46382521)
57. Ye, L.R., and Johnson, P.E. The impact of explanation facilities on user acceptance of expert systems advice. MIS Quarterly, 19, 2 (1995), 157-172.
58. Zhou, L., and Zhang, D. Typing or messaging? Modality effect on deception detection in computer-mediated communication. Decision Support Systems, 44, 1 (2007), 188-201. (Pubitemid 47374307)
59. Zhou, L., and Zhang, D. Following linguistic footprints: Automatic deception detection in online communication. Communications of the ACM, 51, 9 (2008), 119-122.
60. Zhou, L.; Shi, Y.; and Zhang, D. A Statistical language modeling approach to online deception detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 20, 8 (2008), 1077-1081.
61. Zhou, L.; Burgoon, J.K.; Nunamaker, J.F.; and Twitchell, D.P. Automated linguistics based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication: An empirical investigation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 1 (2004), 81-106. (Pubitemid 39046078)
62. Zhou, L.; Twitchell, D.P.; Qin, T.; Burgoon, J.K.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Toward the automatic prediction of deception-An empirical comparison of classification methods. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 4 (Spring 2004), 139-166.
63. Zuckerman, M.; DePaulo, B.M.; and Rosenthal, R., Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 14. New York: Academic Press, 1981, pp. 1-59.