Econometric models for biohydrogen development

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 8475-8483

  Lee, Duu Hwa ^a   Lee, Duu Jong ^b,c   Veziroglu, Ayfer ^d  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d International Association for Hydrogen Energy   (United States)

Author keywords

Biohydrogen; Computational general equilibrium models; Input output model; Linear programming model

Indexed keywords

BIO-HYDROGEN; CLEAN ENERGY SOURCES; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS; DECISION MAKERS; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES; ECONOMETRIC MODEL; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-FRIENDLY; HIGH ENERGY; INPUT-OUTPUT; INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODEL; LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODELS; PATHWAY APPROACH; SAMPLE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

LIFE CYCLE;

HYDROGEN;

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS POWER; CLEANER PRODUCTION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMETRICS; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LINEAR PROGRAMING; LINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENERGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

BIOFUELS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROGEN; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; THERMODYNAMICS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 80051690006     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ABARE, 1996. The MEGABARE Model: Interim Documentation. AGPS, ABARE, Canberra.
2. Abreu A.A., Alves J.I., Pereira M.A., Karakashev D., Alves M.M., Angelidaki I. Engineered heat treated methanogenic granules: a promising biotechnological approach for extreme thermophilic biohydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:9577-9586.
3. Almansoori A., Shah N. Design and operation of a future hydrogen supply chain: multi-period model. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7883-7897.
4. Bae J.H., Cho G.L. A dynamic general equilibrium analysis on fostering a hydrogen economy in Korea. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:S57-S66.
5. Bianco V., Manca O., Nardini S. Electricity consumption forecasting in Italy using linear regression models. Energy 2009, 34:1413-1421.
6. Bickel, P., Friedrich, R., 2005. ExternE: externalities of energy, methodology 2005 update, Cite Date: 2010/11/28. http://www.externe.info/.
7. Bohringer C., Rutherford T.F. Integrated assessment of energy policies: decomposing top-down and bottom-up. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 2009, 33:1648-1661.
8. Cicas G., Hendrickson C.T., Horvath A., Matthews H.S. A regional version of a US economic input-output life-cycle assessment model. Int. J. LCA 2007, 12(6):365-372.
9. Dagoumas A.S., Barker T.S. Pathways to a low-carbon economy for the UK with the macro-econometric E3MG model. Energy Policy 2010, 38:3067-3077.
10. Dixon P.B., Rimmer M.T. The US economy from 1992 to 1998: results from a detailed CGE model. Econ Rec. 2004, 80:S13-S23.
11. Dixon P.B., Parmenter B.R., Sutton J., Vincent D.P. ORANI: A Multisectoral Model of The Australian Economy 1982, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
12. Djomo, S.N., Blumberga, D., 2010. Comparative life cycle assessment of three biohydrogen pathways. Bioresour. Technol. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.139.
13. Druckman A., Jackson T. The carbon footprint of UK households 1990-2004: a socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2066-2077.
14. Endo E. Market penetration analysis of fuel cell vehicles in Japan by using the energy system model MARKAL. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:1347-1354.
15. European Commission, 1999. ExternE-Externalities of Energy. Vol. 7, Methodology 1998 Update (EUR 19083). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of European Communities.
16. Garcia R.S., Weisser D. A wind-diesel system with hydrogen storage: joint optimisation of design and dispatch. Renew. Energy 2006, 31:2296-2320.
17. Geng A., He Y., Quian C., Yan X., Zhou Z. Effect of key factors on hydrogen production from cellulose in a co-culture of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermopalmariom. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4029-4033.
18. Granovskii M., Dincer I., Rosen M.A. Exergetic life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from renewables. J. Power Sources 2007, 167:461-471.
19. Gul T., Kypreos S., Turton H., Barreto L. An energy-economic scenario analysis of alternative fuels for personal transport using the global multi-regional MARKAL model (GMM). Energy 2009, 34:1423-1437.
20. Hainoun A., Almoustafa A., Aldin M.S. Estimating the health damage costs of syrian electricity generation system using impact pathway approach. Energy 2010, 35:628-638.
21. Hawkins T., Hendrickson C., Higgins C., Matthews H.S., Suh S. A mixed-unit input-output model for environmental life-cycle assessment and material flow analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:1024-1031.
22. Hendrickson C., Horvath A., Joshi S., Lave L. Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32(7):184A-191A.
23. Hertel T.W., Tyner W.E., Birur D.K. The global impacts of biofuel mandates. Energy J. 2010, 31(1):75-100.
24. Hertwich E. Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: a critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39(13):4673-4684.
25. Houghton T., Cruden A. An investment-led approach to analyzing the hydrogen energy economy in the UK electronic & electrical engineering department. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:4454-4462.
26. Hourcade, J.C., Jaccard, M., Bataille, C., 2006. Hybrid modeling: new answers to old challenges. Energy J. special issue 2, 1-11.
27. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 1997. ISO 14040, environmental management- life cycle assessment- principles and framework. ISO, Geneve.
28. Jacobsen H.K. Integrating the bottom-up and top-down approach to energy economy modelling: the case of Denmark. Energy Econ. 1998, 20:443-461.
29. Jokisch S., Mennel T. Hydrogen in passenger transport: a macroeconomic analysis. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29(4):415-438.
30. Karanfil F. How many times again will we examine the energy-income nexus using a limited range of traditional econometric tools?. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1191-1194.
31. Karnik A.V., Fernandes C. Natural resource dependence: a macroeconometric model for the United Arab Emirates. Appl. Econ. 2009, 41:1157-1174.
32. Keoleian, G.A., Menerey, D., 1993. Life-Cycle Design Guidance Manual. Cite Date: 2010/10/28. http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_Report.cfm?dirEntryID=35524.
33. Khajehpour M., Farhadi F., Pishvaie M.R. Reduced superstructure solution of MINLP problem in refinery hydrogen management. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:9233-9238.
34. Kivisto A., Santala V., Karp M. Hydrogen production from glucerol using halophilic fermentative bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8671-8677.
35. Kongjan P., Angelidaki I. Extreme thermophilic biohydrogen production from wheat straw hydrolysate using mixed culture fermentation: effect of reactor configuration. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7789-7796.
36. Koopmans C.C., te Velde D.W. Bridging the energy efficiency gap: using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model. Energy Econ. 2001, 23:57-75.
37. Koroneos C., Dompros A., Roumbas G. Hydrogen production via biomass gasification - a life cycle assessment approach. Chem. Eng. Process. 2008, 47(8):1267-1274.
38. Kretschmer B., Peterson S. Integrating bioenergy into computable general equilibrium models - a survey. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:673-686.
39. Kumar A., Gautami G., Khanam S. Hydrogen distribution in the refinery using mathematical modeling. Energy 2010, 35:3763-3772.
40. Lave L.B., Hendrickson C.T., McMichael F.C. Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29(9):420-426.
41. Lee D.H. Algal biodiesel economy and competition among bio-fuels. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:43-49.
42. Lee D.H., Lee D.J. Hydrogen economy in Taiwan and biohydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33(5):1607-1618.
43. Lee D.H., Lee D.J. Biofuel economy and hydrogen competition. Energy Fuels 2008, 22(1):177-181.
44. Lee, D.H., Lee, D.J., 2010. Biohydrogen development in United States and in China: an input-output model study. 2010 Asian bio-hydrogen symposium. International association for hydrogen energy, Taipei, Taiwan.
45. Lee D.H., Hsu S.S., Tso C.T., Su A., Lee D.J. An economy-wide analysis of hydrogen economy in Taiwan. Renew. Energy 2009, 34(8):1947-1954.
46. Liang Q.M., Fan Y., Wei Y.M. Multi-regional input-output model for regional energy requirements and CO2 emissions in China. Energy Policy 2007, 35:1685-1700.
47. Liang S., Wang C., Zhang T. An improved input-output model for energy analysis: a case study of Suzhou. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1805-1813.
48. Ljunggren M., Zacchi G. Techno-economic analysis of a two-step biological process producing hydrogen and methane. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7780-7788.
49. Luo G., Xie L., Zou Z., Wang W., Zhou Q. Evaluation of pretreatment methods on mixed inoculums for both batch and continuous thermophilic biohydrogen production from cassava stillage. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:959-964.
50. Miller R.E., Blair P.D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions 1985, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. 1st ed.
51. Mohammadi A., Mahmoud O. Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Appl. Energy 2010, 87:191-196.
52. Ortiz O., Castells F., Sonnemann G. Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23:28-39.
53. Otto V.M., Loschel A., Dellink R. Energy biased technical change: a CGE analysis. Resour. Energy Econ. 2007, 29(2):137-158.
54. Parmenter, B.R. 1995. Forecasting and policy analysis with the MONASH model. Paper prepared for the international symposium on economic modeling, Bologna, Italy.
55. Perera K.R.J., Nirmalakhandan N. Enhancing fermentative hydrogen production from sucrose. Bioresourc. Technol. 2010, 101:9137-9143.
56. Pietrapertosa F., Cosmi C., Macchiato M. Life cycle assessment, ExternE and comprehensive analysis for an integrated evaluation of the environmental impact of anthropogenic activities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13(5):1039-1048.
57. Pokharel S. An econometric analysis of energy consumption in Nepal. Energy Policy 2007, 35:350-361.
58. Prakasham R.S., Sathish T., Brahmaiah P. Biohydrogen production process optimization using anaerobic mixed consortia: a prelude study for use of agro-industrial material hydrolysate as substrate. Bioresourc. Technol. 2010, 101:5708-5711.
59. Qadrdan M., Saboohi Y., Shayegan J. A model for investigation of optimal hydrogen pathway, and evaluation of environmental impacts of hydrogen supply system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:7314-7325.
60. Rebitzera G., Ekvallb T., Frischknechtc R., Hunkelerd D., Norrise G., Rydbergf T., Schmidtg W.P., Suhh S., Weidemai B.P., Penningtonf D.W. Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ. Int. 2004, 30:701-720.
61. Rivers N., Jaccard M. Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to energy-economy modeling using discrete choice methods. Energy J. 2005, 26(1):83-106.
62. Roy P., Nei D., Orikasa T., Xu Q., Okadome H., Nakamura N., Shiina Y. A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J. Food Eng. 2009, 90:1-10.
63. Sandoval R., Karplus V.J., Paltsev S., Reilly J.M. Modelling prospects for hydrogen-powered transportation until 2100. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 2009, 43:291-316.
64. Schumacher K., Sands R.D. Where are the industrial technologies in energy-economy models? An innovative CGE approach for steel production in Germany. Energy Econ. 2007, 29(4):799-825.
65. SETAC (Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), 1991. A technical framework for life-cycle assessments. Proceedings published by SETAC in January 1991.
66. Seymour E.H., Borges F.C., Fernandes R. Indicators of European public research in hydrogen and fuel cells - an input-output analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32(15):3212-3222.
67. Sharrard A.L., Matthews H.S., ASCE A.M., Ries R.J. Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment model. J. Infrastruc. Syst. 2008, 14(4):327-336.
68. Spath, P.L., Mann, M.K., 2004. Life cycle assessment of renewable hydrogen production via wind/electrolysis milestone completion report. Cite Date: 2010/11/28. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/35404.pdf.
69. Swan L.G., Ugursal V.I. Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: a review of modeling techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13:1819-1835.
70. Tseng P., Lee J., Friley P. A hydrogen economy: opportunities and challenges. Energy 2005, 30(14):2703-2720.
71. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2010. Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2008, Cited Date: 2010/12/20. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html.
72. USDOE (Department of Energy), 2006. Hydrogen posture plan, Cite Date: 2010/11/28. http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/hydrogen_posture_plan_dec06.pdf.
73. van Blottnitz H., Curran M.A. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J. Clean Prod. 2007, 15:607-619.
74. Wietschel M., Seydel P. Economic impacts of hydrogen as an energy carrier in European countries. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:3201-3211.
75. Yeh S., Loughlin D.H., Shay C., Gage C. An integrated assessment of the impacts of hydrogen economy on transportation, energy use, and air emissions. Proc. IEEE 2006, 94(10):1838-1851.