Where are the industrial technologies in energy-economy models? An innovative CGE approach for steel production in Germany

Energy Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 799-825

  Schumacher, Katja ^a   Sands, Ronald D ^b  

^a DIW BERLIN   (Germany)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy use; General equilibrium modeling; Industrial technologies; Iron and steel production; Technological change

Indexed keywords

ENERGY UTILIZATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCTION;

ENERGY-INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELING; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES; IRON AND STEEL PRODUCTION; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 34249067467     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. 2-Minderung bei der Stahlerzeugung. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 78 4 (2006) 397-406
2. 2 Emission bei der Hochofen-Konverte-Route. Stahl und Eisen 121 5 (2001) 59-65
3. Ameling D. Erfolgsfaktoren für einen starken Industriestandort Deutschland - Das Beispiel Stahl. Stahl und Eisen 125 4 (2005) 80-85
4. Ameling D., and Aichinger H.M. Beitrag von Wirtschaft und Stahlindustrie zur Minderung klimawirksamer Emissionen in Deutschland im Kontext der Klimavorsorgepolitik (Economy's and steel industry's contribution to climate effective emissions in Germany in the context of climate preventive policy). Stahl und Eisen 121 7 (2001) 61-69
5. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen (AGEB). Energiebilanzen Deutschland (Energy Balances Germany) 1995 (1999). http://www.ag-energiebilanzen.de/
6. Bataille C., Jaccard M., Nyboer J., and Rivers N. Towards general equilibrium in a technology-rich model with empirically estimated behavioral parameters. Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-Up and Top-Down. Special Issue of The Energy Journal (2006) 93-112
7. Böhringer C. The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling. Energy Economics 20 3 (1998) 233-248
8. Böhringer C., and Löschel A. Promoting renewable energy in Europe: a hybrid computable general equilibrium approach. Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-Up and Top-Down. Special Issue of The Energy Journal (2006) 135-150
9. Boyd G.A., and Karlson S.H. The impact of energy prices on technology choice in the United States steel industry. The Energy Journal 14 2 (1993) 47-56
10. Buttermann H.G., and Hillebrand B. Klimagasemissionen in Deutschland in den Jahren 2005/07 und 2008/12. RWI: Materialien Heft vol. 2 (2001)
11. Buttermann H.G., and Hillebrand B. Stahlwerkstoffe: "Rohstoffe" für die Wirtschaft in Deutschland. Stahl und Eisen 125 8 (2005) 81-85
12. 2 emission reduction in the steel industry. PhD thesis. Rijksuniversteit Groningen. Universal Press Veenendaal.
13. de Beer J., Worrell E., and Blok K. Future technologies for energy efficient iron and steel making. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 23 (1998) 123-205
14. DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research). Economic Bulletin 10, Wochenbericht Nr. 10, März 2004 (2004). www.diw.de
15. Edmonds, J., Roop, J.M., Scott, M., 2001. Technology change and its effects on mitigation costs. In: Pew Center on Global Climate Change (Ed.) Climate Change-Science, Strategies and Solutions, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Brill, Leiden, p. 209-226.
16. Edmonds J.A., Pitcher H.M., and Sands R.D. Second Generation Model 2004: An Overview (2004), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PNNL-14916
17. Esso. Esso Energieprognose 2001 (2001). www.esso.de
18. E3M Lab. European Union energy and transport trends to 2030. Study prepared for the Directorate General for Energy and Transport of the European Commission (2003)
19. Fawcett A.A., and Sands R.D. The Second Generation Model: Model Description and Theory (2005), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PNNL-15432
20. FEES (Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen in Deutschland) 2006 (ed.). Energiemodelle zu Innovation und moderner Energietechnik - Analyse exogenen und endogenen technischen Fortschritts in der Energiewirtschaft. LIT-Publisher, Münster.
21. Fruehan R.J. New steelmaking processes: drivers, requirement and potential impact. Ironmaking and Steelmaking 32 1 (2005) 3-8
22. 2 in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 849-863
23. 2 emissions for the Japanese iron and steel industry. Environmental Modelling and Software 5 (2002) 481-495
24. 2 emissions; a survey and analysis. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 18 (1993) 297-478
25. 2 emission trading analyses in the iron and steel industry: a global model. Energy 30 (2005) 583-610
26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In: Metz B., Davidson O., de Coninck H.C., Loos M., and Meyer L.A. (Eds). IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 442 pp.
27. International Iron and Steel Institute (IISI). Statistics on Energy in the Steel Industry, 1996 Update (1996), Committee on technology, Brussels
28. International Iron and Steel Institute (IISI). Energy Use in the Steel Industry (1998), Committee on technology, Brussels
29. International Iron and Steel Institute (IISI). World Steel in Figures (2006). http://www.worldsteel.org Download at www.worldsteel.org
30. Jaccard M., Nyboer J., Bataille C., and Sadownik B. Modeling the cost of climate policy: distinguishing between alternative cost definitions and long-run cost dynamics. The Energy Journal 24 1 (2003) 49-73
31. Jaffe A., Newell R., and Stavins R. Technological change and the environment. In: Mäler K.G., and Vincent J. (Eds). Handbook Environmental Economics vol. 1, Ch. 11 (2003), North-Holland/Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 461-516
32. 2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry. Energy Policy 30 10 (2002) 827-838
33. Knop K. Wirtschaftlicher Vergleich der Rohstahlerzeugung auf Basis von Feinerzreduktion und Schachtofenreduktion. Stahl und Eisen 12 11 (2000) 57-66
34. Li P.C., Huang C.H., and Hsu S.H. Energy substitution in CGE modelling-using the "Technology Bundle" approach: the case of Taiwan (2000). http://www.monash.edu.au/policy/conf/21Hsu.pdf downloadable from the Monash website, www.monash.edu.au/policy/conf/21Hsu.pdf
35. Li P.C., Hsu S.H., Huang C.H., and Lin H.H. Baseline forecasting for greenhouse gas reductions in Taiwan: a dynamic CGE analysis. In: Chang C., Meldensohn R., and Shaw D. (Eds). Global Warming and the Asian Pacific (2003), Edward Elgar 35-59
36. Luiten E. Beyond energy efficiency. Actors, Networks and Government Intervention in the Development of Industrial Process Technologies (2001), Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht
37. Lüngen H.B., and Steffen R. Vergleichende Bewertung der Erzeugungskosten für Roheisen und Eisenschwamm. Stahl und Eisen 118 3 (1998) 87-93
38. Lüngen H.B., Mühlheims K., and Steffen R. Stand der Direktreduktion und Schmelzreduktion von Eisenerzen (State of the art of direct reduction and smelting reduction of iron ores). Stahl und Eisen 121 5 (2001) 35-47
39. Lutz C., Meyer B., Nathani C., and Schleich J. Endogenous technological change and emissions: the case of the German steel industry. Energy Policy 33 9 (2005) 1143-1154
40. In: Markewitz P., and Ziesing H.-J. (Eds). Politikszenarien für den Umweltschutz: Langfristszenarien und Handlungsempfehlungen ab 2012. Eine Untersuchung im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Reihe Umwelt/Environment vol. 50 (2004)
41. Mathiesen L., and Moestad O. Climate policy and the steel industry: achieving global emission reductions by an incomplete climate agreement. The Energy Journal 25 4 (2004) 91-114
42. McFarland J.R., Reilly J.M., and Herzog H.J. Representing energy technologies in top-down economic models using bottom-up information. Energy Economics 26 (2004) 685-707
43. Metal Bulletin, various years, January and July issues. Scrap and secondary metals. Ferrous scrap prices Germany.
44. Nil J. Technological competition, time and windows of opportunity-the case of iron and steel production technologies. IÖW Discussion Paper 58/03 (2003)
45. Pant H.M. GTEM: The Global Trade and Environment Model (2002), Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra
46. Pant H.M., and Fisher B. Assessing the Role of Energy Technology in Mitigating GHG Emissions Conference Paper 04.26, ABARE, Canberra (2004)
47. Perroni C., and Rutherford T.F. Regular flexibility of nested CES functions. European Economic Review 39 (1995) 335-343
48. Phylipsen G.J.M., Blok K., and Worrell E. Handbook on International Comparisons of Energy Efficiency in the Manufacturing Industry (1998), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Netherlands
49. Prognos/EWI (Energiewirtschaftliches Institut der Universität Köln). Energiereport III. Die längerfristige Entwicklung der Energiemärkte im Zeichen von Wettbewerb und Umwelt (1999), Stuttgart
50. Proost S., and van Regemorter D. How to achieve the Kyoto target in Belgium-modelling methodology and some results. Working Paper Series No 2000-09 (2000), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
51. Ruth M., and Amato A. Vintage structure dynamics and climate change policies the case of US iron and steel. Energy Policy 30 7 (2002) 541-552
52. Rynikiewicz C. The climate change challenge and transitions for radical change in the European steel industry. Paper presented at the 10th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ERSCP), Antwerp 5-7 October 2005 (2005)
53. Sands R.D. Dynamics of carbon abatement in the second generation model. Energy Economics 26 4 (2004) 721-738
54. Sands R.D., and Fawcett A.A. The second generation model: data, parameters, and implementation (2005), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PNNL-15431
55. Saunders H.D. A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 28 6-7 (2000) 439-449
56. Saunders H.D. Does predicted rebound depend on distinguishing between energy and energy services?. Energy Policy 28 6-7 (2000) 497-500
57. Schäfer A., and Jacoby H.D. Technology detail in a multi-sector CGE model: transport under climate policy. Energy Economics 27 1 (2005) 1-24
58. Schäfer A., and Jacoby H.D. Experiments with a hybrid CGE-MARKAL Model. Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-up and Top-down. Special Issue of The Energy Journal (2006) 171-177
59. Schnabel S. Vom Eisenschwamm zum Qualitätsstahl (From direct reduced iron to high grade steel). Stahl und Eisen 124 1 (2004) 39-42
60. Schumacher K., and Sands R.D. Innovative energy technologies and climate policy in Germany. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3939-3941
61. Schumacher K., and Sathaye J. India's Iron and Steel Industry: Productivity, Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emissions, LBNL-41844 (1998), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
62. Shoven J.B., and Whalley J. Applying General Equilibrium (1992), Cambridge University Press
63. Statistisches Bundesamt. Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung, Input-Output Tabellen 1995 (1995), Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden
64. Statistisches Bundesamt. Produzierendes Gewerbe. Eisen und Stahl. Fachserie 4 Reihe 8.1 (2006), Statistisches Bundesamt (Federal Statistical Office), Wiesbaden February 2006
65. Stubbles J. Energy use in the U.S. steel industry: An historical perspective and future opportunities. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy (2000). http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/steel/pdfs/steel_energy_use.pdf
66. UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC). The macro-economic rebound effect and the UK economy. Working Paper July 2006 (2006). http://www.ukerc.ac.uk http://www.ukerc.ac.uk
67. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). International Energy Outlook 2002 (2002)
68. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). Mineral yearbook 2004. Iron and steel scrap (2004). http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/iron_&_steel_scrap/ index.html#myb
69. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2006 (2006). http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/2006/mcs2006.pdf
70. World Energy Council (WEC). Energy Efficiency Improvement Utilizing High Technology-An Assessment of Energy Use in Industry and Buildings (1995), London, UK
71. Worrell E., and Biermans G. Move over! Stock turnover, retrofit and industrial energy efficiency. Energy Policy 33 (2005) 949-962
72. Worrell E., Price L., Martin N., Farla J., and Schaeffer R. Energy intensity in the iron and steel industry: a comparison of physical indicators. Energy Policy 25 7-9 (1997) 727-744
73. Worrell E., Price L., and Martin N. Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the US iron and steel sector. Energy 26 (2001) 513-536
74. WV Stahl and VDEH (Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl und Verein Deutscher Eisenhüttenleute). Statistical Yearbook of the Steel Industry 2005/2006. Düsseldorf (2005)