An integrated assessment of the impacts of hydrogen economy on transportation, energy use, and air emissions

Proceedings of the IEEE

Volumn 94, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1838-1851

  Yeh, Sonia ^a   Loughlin, Daniel H ^b   Shay, Carol ^b   Gage, Cynthia ^b  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; Energy modeling; Greenhouse gases; Light duty vehicles; Monte Carlo simulation; Sensitivity analysis; Transportation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; HYDROGEN; MONTE CARLO METHODS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ENERGY MODELING; HYDROGEN FUEL CELL VEHICLES; LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES; TOTAL SYSTEM ENERGY USAGES;

FUEL ECONOMY;

EID: 33947309393     PISSN: 00189219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.883719     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. B. Suresh, R. Gubler, and T. Sasano, Chemical Economics Handbook: Hydrogen. Menlo Park, CA: SRI Int., 2001.
2. J. M. Ogden, "Prospects for building a hydrogen energy infrastructure," Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., vol. 24, pp. 227-279, 1999.
3. R. Kottenstette and J. Cotrell, Hydrogen storage in wind turbine toivers: Cost analysis and conceptual design, Tech. Rep. NREL/ CP-500-34851, 2003.
4. L. J. Fingersh, Optimized hydrogen and electricity generation from wind, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-500-34364, 2003.
5. National Research Council, The hydrogen economy: Opportunities, costs, barriers, and R&D needs. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.
6. D. Hart, P. Freund, and A. Smith, Eds. Hydrogen - Today and tomorrow, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, 1999.
7. J. M. Ogden, "Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: A southern California case study," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 24, pp. 709-730, 1999.
8. U.S. Department of Energy, Hydrogen, fuel cells and infrastructure technologies program: Safety, codes and standards, Jul. 1, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/codes/
9. G. Vogel, "Will the future dawn in the north?" Science, vol. 305, pp. 966-967, 2004.
10. Executive order S-7-04 by the Governor of the State of California, Apr. 20, 2004.
11. 2," Science, vol. 305, pp. 964-965, 2004.
12. M. A. Weiss, J. B. Heywood, A. Schafer, and V. K. Natarajan, "Comparative assessment of fuel cell'cars," Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, MIT LFEE 2003-001, 2003.
13. M. A. Weiss, J. Heywood, A. Schafer, E. Drake, and F. AuYeng, "On the road in 2020: A life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies," Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, EL 00-003, 2000.
14. M. Wang, "Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: Well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts," J. Power Sources, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 307-321, 2002.
15. _, "Well-to-whcels energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions-Hybrid electric and fuel-cell vehicles," presented at the 2003 SAE Future Transportation Technology Conf., Costa Mesa, CA, 2003.
16. J. Schindler. (2003). Life cycle analysis of hydrogen fuel. L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH. [Online]. Available: http://www.hyweb.de/Wissen/pdf/H2- LCA_EHEC_SchindIer_03SEP2003.pdf
17. J. F. Contadini and R. M. Moore, "Results of a life cycle assessment using uncertainty analysis of fuel cell vehicles within the South Coast Air Basin of California in 2010," Gate to EHS, pp. 1-15, 2003.
18. D. Greene and A. Schafer, Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Transportation. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2003.
19. K.-A. Adamson, "Hydrogen from renewable resources-The hundred year commitment," Energy Policy, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1231-1242, 2004.
20. A. J. Seebregts, G. A. Goldstein, and K. Smekens, "Energy/ environmental modeling with the markal family of models, presented at the OR 2001 Conf., Duisburg, Germany.
21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S.'EPA national MARKAL database: Model documentation, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/R-06/057, 2006.
22. U.S. Department of Energy, Quality metrics report. Office of Transportation Technology, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2003.
23. J. DeCicco, F. An, and M. Ross, Technical options for improving the fuel efficiency of U.S. cars and light duty trucks by 2010-2015, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, Rep. T012, 2001.
24. D. Gielen and L. Fulton, "Current IEA analysis on hydrogen," presented at the International Energy Workshop, Paris, France, 2004.
25. M. Altmann, "Towards a European hydrogen roadmap," presented at the Hydrogen in Europe-Towards a Consistent Policy Framework for Sustainable Energy and Mobility Conf., Bruges, Belgium, 2004.
26. Energy Information Administration, Annual energy outlook 2006 with projections to 2030, Washington, DC, 2006.
27. The greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transponation (GREET) model: Univ. Chicago, Chicago, IL.
28. MOVES (motor vehicle emission simulator): Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ), Ann Arbor, MI.
29. K. Arrow, "The economic implications of learning by doing," Rev. Econ. Studies, vol. 29, pp. 155-173, 1962.
30. C.-O. Wene. (2000). Experience Curves for Energy Technology PolicyParis, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency. [Online]. Available: http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/curve2000.pdf#search= %22%22Experience%20Curves%20for%20Energy%20Technology%20Policy%22%22
31. A. Grubler, N. Nakicenovic, and D. G. Victor, "Modeling technological change: Implications for the global environment," Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., vol. 24, pp. 545-569, 1999.
32. L. Barreto and S. Kypreos, "Multi-regional technological learning in the energy-systems markal model," Int. J. Global Energy Issues, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 189-213, 2002.
33. B. C. C. van der Zwaan, R. Gerlagh, G. Klaassen, and L. Schrattenholzer, "Endogenous technological change in climate change modeling," Energy Econ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2002.
34. Boston Consulting Group, Perspectives on experience, Boston, MA, 1968.
35. A. McDonald and L. Schrattenholzer, "Learning rates for energy technologies," Energy Policy, vol. 29, pp. 255-261, 2001.
36. EIA, Annual energy outlook 2005 with projections to 2025, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, Rep. DOE/EIA-0383, 2005.
37. P. B. Weisz, "Basic choices and constraints on long-term energy supplies," Physics Today, vol. 37, no. 7, p. 47, 2004.
38. M. Z. Jacobson, W. G. Colella, and D. M. Golden, "Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles," Science, vol. 308, no. 24, pp. 1901-1905, 2005.