Characterization of soft contact lens edge fitting using ultra-high resolution and ultra-long scan depth optical coherence tomography

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 4091-4097

  Shen, Meixiao ^a   Cui, Lele ^a   Riley, Colleen ^b   Wang, Michael R ^c   Wang, Jianhua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Vistakon   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONJUNCTIVA; CORNEA LIMBUS; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SOFT CONTACT LENS; TEAR FILM; ULTRA HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRA LONG SCAN DEPTH OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; CORNEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; IN VITRO STUDY; LACRIMAL FLUID; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSTHESIS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ADULT; CONJUNCTIVA; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TEARS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 80051628037     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6507     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Young G, Coleman S. Poorly fitting soft lenses affect ocular integrity. CLAO J. 2001;27:68-74.
2. Fonn D. Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:279-285.
3. Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takamata A, et al. Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2563-2568.
4. Caffery BE, Richter D, Simpson T, et al. CANDEES: the Canadian Dry Eye Epidemiology Study. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;438:805-806.
5. Wang J, Jiao S, Ruggeri M, et al. In situ visualization of tears on contact lens using ultra high resolution optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:44-49.
6. Shen M, Wang MR, Wang J, et al. Entire contact lens imaged in vivo and in vitro with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:73-76.
7. Mimura T, Usui T, Yamamoto H, et al. Conjunctivochalasis and contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:20-25.
8. Chen Q, Wang J, Tao A, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution measurement by optical coherence tomography of dynamic tear film changes on contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1988-1993.
9. Patel S, Bevan R, Farrell JC. Diurnal variation in precorneal tear film stability. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65:151-154.
10. Shen M, Wang J, Qu J, et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:1185-1192.
11. Westphal V, Rollins A, Radhakrishnan S, et al. Correction of geometric and refractive image distortions in optical coherence tomography applying Fermat's principle. Opt Express. 2002;10:397-404.
12. Refojo MF, Miller D, Fiore AS. A new fluorescent stain for soft hydrophilic lens fitting. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;87:275-277.
13. Jenkins JT, Shimbo M. The distribution of pressure behind a soft contact lens. J Biomech Eng. 1984;106:62-65.
14. Martin DK, Holden BA. Forces developed beneath hydrogel contact lenses due to squeeze pressure. Phys Med Biol. 1986;31:635-649.
15. Dumbleton K. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2002;25:137-146.
16. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn J, Gilmartin B. Conjunctival epithelial flaps with 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:35-38.
17. Martin DK, Boulos J, Gan J, et al. A unifying parameter to describe the clinical mechanics of hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:87-91.
18. Yong G. Ocular sagittal height and soft contact lens fit. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1992;15:45-49.
19. Lin MC, Soliman GN, Lim VA, et al. Scalloped channels enhance tear mixing under hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:874-878.
20. Chauhan A, Radke CJ. The role of fenestrations and channels on the transverse motion of a soft contact lens. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:732-743.
21. Miller KL, Polse KA, Radke CJ. Fenestrations enhance tear mixing under silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:60-67.
22. Pult H, Purslow C, Berry M, Murphy PJ. Clinical tests for successful contact lens wear: relationship and predictive potential. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:E924-E929.
23. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, et al. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1172-1177.
24. Brautaset RL, Nilsson M, Leach N, et al. Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:312-316.
25. Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Simon KM, et al. Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:20-30.
26. Efron N, Al Dossari M, Pritchard N. Confocal microscopy of the bulbar conjunctiva in contact lens wear. Cornea. 2010;29:43-52.
27. Perez JG, Meijome JM, Jalbert I, et al. Corneal epithelial thinning profile induced by long-term wear of hydrogel lenses. Cornea. 2003;22:304-307.
28. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, et al. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:9-12.