Envisioning the library's role in scholarly communication in the year 2025

Portal

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 659-681

  Carpenter, Maria ^a   Graybill, Jolie ^a   Offord, Jerome ^a   Piorun, Mary ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051619420     PISSN: 15312542     EISSN: 15307131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/pla.2011.0014     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Joan M. Reitz, Dictionary for Library and Information Science (Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004).
2. Nancy Maron and K. Kirby Smith, "Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries" (November 2008), http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/current-models-report.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011).
3. Mark Ware and Michael Mabe, The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journals Publishing (Oxford: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 2009).
4. Ware and Mabe, The STM Report.
5. Steve Kolowich, "News: Encouraging Open Access" (March 2, 2010) Inside Higher Ed http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/news/2010/03/02/repositories(accessed February 9, 2011).
6. The NIH Public Access Policy implements Division F, Section 217, P.L. 111-8, which requires all investigators receiving funding from the NIH to submit (or have submitted for them) an electronic version of their final, peer-reviewed manuscripts. This submission to the National Library of Medicine's PubMed Central must occur no later than 12 months after the official date of publication. Notes.
7. Roger C. Schonfeld and Ross Housewright, Faculty Survey 2009: Key Strategic Insights for Libraries, Publishers, and Societies (April 7, 2010), http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/faculty-surveys-2000-2009/Faculty%20Study%202009.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011).
8. Steve O'Connor and Lai-chong Au, "Steering a Future through Scenarios: Into the Academic Library of the Future," The Journal of Academic Librarianship 35, 1 (Elsevier, 2009).
9. Logan Ludwig, Joan Giesecke, and Linda Walton, "Scenario Planning: A Tool for Academic Health Sciences Libraries," Health Information & Libraries Journal 27, 1 (2010): 28-36.
10. Marcos A. Gonçalves, Edward A. Fox, Layne T. Watson, and Neill A. Kipp, "Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, Societies (5S): A Formal Model for Digital Libraries," ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22, 2 (2004): 270-312
11. S. N. Vignesh, "The Future Scenario of Digital Library Era," SRELS Journal of Information Management 46, 1 (2009): 25-28.
12. Peter Hernon and Laura Saunders, "The Federal Depository Library Program in 2023: One Perspective on the Transition to the Future," College & Research Libraries 70, 4 (2009): 351-370.
13. Ludwig et al., "Scenario Planning."
14. Association of Research Libraries. "Envisioning Research Library Futures: A Scenario Thinking Project," http://www.arl.org/rtl/plan/scenarios/index.shtml (accessed February 9, 2011).
15. David J. Staley, Kara J. Malenfant, and Association of College and Research Libraries. Futures Thinking for Academic Librarians: Higher Education in 2025 (Chicago, IL: ACRL, Association of College & Research Libraries, 2010).
16. Maron and Smith "Current Models."
17. Donatella Castelli, "Digital Libraries of the Future - and the Role of Libraries," Library Hi Tech 24, 4 (2006): 496-503.
18. st Century" College & Research Libraries 68, 5 (2007): 418-434.
19. Maron and Smith, M "Current Models."
20. Castelli, "Digital Libraries of the Future".
21. David W. Lewis, "A Strategy for Academic Libraries in the First Quarter of the 21st Century" College & Research Libraries 68, 5 (2007): 418-434.
22. Kate Wittenberg, "The Role of the Library in 21st Century Scholarly Publishing" in No Brief Candle: Reconceiving Research Libraries for the 21st Century (August 2008), Council on Library and Information Resources Publication No. 142, http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub142/pub142.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011): 35-41.
23. Council on Library and Information Resources, No Brief Candle: Reconceiving Research Libraries for the 21st Century Century (August 2008), Council on Library and Information Resources Publication No. 142, http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub142/pub142.pdf(accessed February 9, 2011).
24. Laura Brown, Rebecca Griffiths and Matthew Rascoff, University Publishing in a Digital Age, ITHAKA Report. http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/strategy/Ithaka%20University%20Publishing%20Report.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011).
25. Sarah E. Thomas, "Publishing Solutions for Contemporary Scholars: The Library as Innovator and Partner," Library Hi Tech 24, 4 (2006): 563-573.
26. CLIR, No Brief Candle; Raym Crow, "Campus-Based Publishing Partnerships: A Guide to the Critical Issues" (January 2009) Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm~doc/pub_partnerships_v1.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011).
27. CLIR, No Brief Candle.
28. Crow, "Campus-Based Publishing Partnerships."
29. Association of American Universities, Association of Research Libraries, the Coalition for Networked Information, and National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges, "The University's Role in the Dissemination of Research and Scholarship -- a Call to Action" (February 2009) http//www.arl.org/bm~doc/disseminating-research-feb09.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011).
30. Association of American Universities et al., "University's Role."
31. Richard Gedye, "Open Access is Only Part of the Story," Serials Review 30, 4 (2009): 271-4.
32. Yassine Gargouri, Chawki Hajjem, Vincent Lariviare, Yves Gingras, Les Carr, Tim Brody, and Stevan Harnad, "Self-selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research," PLoS ONE 5 10 (2010): e13636.
33. Steve Hitchcock, "The Effect of Open Access and Downloads ('hits') on Citation Impact: a Bibliography of Studies" (December 2010) http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html.
34. Alma Swan, "The Open Access Citation Advantage: Studies and Results to Date," School of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton, Technical Report (2010) http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516/ (accessed February 9, 2011).
35. Michael C. Calver, and J. Stuart Bradley, "Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Nonopen Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book Chapters," Conservation Biology 24, 3 (Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2010): 872-880.
36. Maron and Smith, "Current Models."
37. Wittenberg, "Role of the Library."
38. Joseph P. Martino, "The Precision of Delphi Estimates," Technological Forecasting 1, 3 (1970): 293-299.
39. Dana Mietzner and Guido Reger, "Advantages and Disadvantages of Scenario Approaches for Strategic Forecasting," International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning 1, 2 (2005): 220-239.
40. th ed., (Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004).
41. Mietzner, "Advantages and Disadvantages of Scenario Approaches."
42. David J. Staley, Kara J. Malenfant, and Association of College and Research Libraries. Futures Thinking for Academic Librarians: Higher Education in 2025 (Chicago, IL: ACRL, 2010).
43. Brown, 'University Publishing in a Digital Age,' 3.
44. Ibid, 29.
45. Andrew Dillon and April Norris, "Crying Wolf: An Examination and Reconsideration of the Perception of Crisis in LIS Education," Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 46, 4 Fall (2005): 280-298.
46. CLIR, No Brief Candle, 6.
47. Leigh S. Estabrook, "What Chief Academic Officers Want from Their Libraries: Findings from Interviews with Provosts and Chief Academic Officers" (October 2007), http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/Finalreport-ACRLCAOs.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011).
48. CLIR, No Brief Candle, 39-40.
49. Staley, Futures Thinking for Academic Librarians.
50. CLIR, No Brief Candle; Brown, "University Publishing in a Digital Age."
51. Mietzner, "Advantages and Disadvantages of Scenario Approaches."
52. Staley, Futures Thinking for Academic Librarians, 23.
53. Brown, "University Publishing in a Digital Age," 7.