Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters;Patrones de citas de artículos y capítulos de libros de biología de la conservación de acceso abierto y acceso no abierto

Conservation Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 872-880

  Calver, Michael C ^a   Bradley, J Stuart ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citation advantage; Conservation biology; Developing country; HDI; Human development index; Open access

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX; NATURE CONSERVATION; PUBLIC ACCESS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH WORK;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR;

BIOLOGY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR;

EID: 77956596904     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01509.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bar-Ilan, J. 2008. Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 74:257-271.
2. Bloom, T., C. Ferguson, L. Gross, C. J. MacCallum, J. Milton, R. Shields S. Wai, J. Weaver, and L. Williams. 2008. PloS Biology at 5: the future is open access. Public Library of Science Biology 6 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060267.
3. Bollen, J., H. van de Sompel, A. Hagberg, and R. Chute. 2009. A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. Public Library of Science ONE 4 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
4. Bornmann, L., and H-D. Daniel. 2009. The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports 10:2-6.
5. Calver, M. C., and J. S. Bradley. 2009. Should we use the mean citations per paper to summarise a journal's impact or to rank journals in the same field? Scientometrics 81:611-615.
6. Calver, M. C., and K. A. Bryant. 2008. Pacific Conservation Biology: an authorship and citation analysis. Pacific Conservation Biology 13:285-303.
7. Cameron, B. D. 2005. Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: uses, abuses, and implication. Libraries and the Academy 5:105-125.
8. Craig, I. D., A. M. Plume, M. E. McVeigh, J. Pringle, and M. Amin. 2007. Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Infometrics 1:239-248.
9. Davis, P. M. 2009. Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: a citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60:3-8.
10. Davis, P. M., B. V. Lewenstein, D. H. Simon, J. G. Booth, and M. J. L. Connolly. 2008. Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 337:343-345.
11. Eysenbach, G. 2006. Citation advantage of open access articles. Public Library of Science Biology 4 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157.
12. Falagas, M. E., and V. G. Alexiou. 2008. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 56:223-226.
13. Frandsen, T. F. 2009. Attracted to open access journals: a bibliometric author analysis in the field of biology. Journal of Documentation 65:58-82.
14. Gardner, S., and S. Eng. 2005. Gaga over Google Scholar in the social sciences. Library Hi Tech News 22:42-45.
15. Harnad, S. 2003. Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving: maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 49:337-342.
16. Harnad, S., and T. Brody. 2004. Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine 10 DOI:10.1045/june2004-harnad.
17. Harnad,S.,T.Brody,F.Vallières, L. Carr, S. Hitchcock, Y. Gingras, C. Oppenheim, C. Hajem, and E. R. Hilf. 2004. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review 30:310-314.
18. Harnad,S.,T.Brody,F.Vallières, L. Carr, S. Hitchcock, Y. Gingras, C. Oppenheim, C. Hajem, and E. R. Hilf. 2008. The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: an update. Serials Review 34:36-40.
19. Harrison, A. L. 2006. Who's who in Conservation Biology: an authorship analysis. Conservation Biology 20:652-657.
20. Harzing, A-W. 2008. Reflections on the h-index. 3rd version (April 2008). Available from http://www.harzing.com/pop_hindex.htm (accessed December 2009).
21. Harzing, A-W., and R. Van Der Wal. 2008. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8:61-73.
22. Jacobson, S. K. 1999. Communication skills for conservation professionals. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
23. Jacobson, S. K., M. D. McDuff, and M. C. Monroe, M. H. 2006. Conservation education and outreach techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
24. Jones, T. H., S. Hanney, and M. J. Buxton. 2006. The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeons. BMC Informatics and Decision Making 6 DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-6-24.
25. Leimu, R., and J. Koricheva. 2005. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:28-32.
26. Lunney, D., editor. 2004. Conservation of Australia's forest fauna. 2nd edition. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney.
27. McLennan, J. 2009. First U.S. public access policy made permanent: 2009 Consolidated Appropriations Act ensures NIH public access policy will persist. Alliance for Tax Payer Access, Washington, D.C. Available from http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/news/news_releases/first-us-public-access- policy-made-permanent.shtml (accessed April 2009).
28. Meho, L. I., and K. Yang. 2007. Impact of data sources on citations counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58:2105-2125.
29. Norse, E. A., and L. B. Crowder, editors. 2005. Marine conservation biology: the science of maintaining the sea's biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
30. Odlyzko, A. 2002. The rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing 15:7-19.
31. Pauly, D., and K. I. Stergiou. 2005. Equivalence of results from two citations analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google Scholar service. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 5: 33-35.
32. Rapport, D. J., W. L. Lasley, D. E. Rolston, N. O. Nielsen, C. O. Qualset, and A. B. Damania, editors. 2003. Managing for healthy ecosystems. CRC/Lewis Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
33. Soulé, M. E., and G. H. Orians, editors. 2001. Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
34. Suber, P. 2009. Timeline of the open access movement. Simmons College, Boston. Available from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Timeline (accessed August 2009).
35. Swan, A. P., and S. N. Brown. 2004. JISC/OSI journal authors survey: report. Key Perspectives, Truro, United Kingdom. Available from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf (accessed August 2009).
36. Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. 4th edition. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
37. Taylor, M., P. Perakakis, and V. Trachana. 2008. The siege of science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8:17-40.
38. UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2009. Human development reports. UNDP, New York. Available from http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ (accessed October 2009).